Scientology is hiding this film, but its director can show us photos from the set!

Karen#1

Well-known member
TONY ORTEGA
Excerpt:

[td width="800px"]
[/td][td]
[/td]​
[Mitch Brisker knows what’s in the tech films]

Last week, we told you about hearing from a reader who remembered seeing a film in Scientology that, on reflection, struck him as very relevant to some of the court cases that the church finds itself in these days.
In particular, courts have been told — and Scientology denies — that the church indoctrinates members so that they never to turn in fellow Scientologists to law enforcement, creating an environment where a criminal serial rapist like Danny Masterson can thrive.
Our reader remembered seeing a “tech film,” which are based on scripts written by Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. This particular movie is a sci-fi story that starred actor Jason Beghe playing a space miner who confesses to a crime very much like the ones that put Masterson in prison. The point of the film, our reader said, was that it was better for Scientology to handle such a confession internally than to involve law enforcement.
We thought this sounded like incredibly relevant information that could possibly be helpful not only in regards to Masterson and the civil lawsuit still pending against him, but also to other litigation against the church.
But there was a problem: The film we were told about, titled TR-13: The Session, is heavily under lock and key.
The person who told us this is its director, Mitch Brisker, who defected from Scientology a few years ago. He confirmed that TR-13: The Session is key evidence that reflects Scientology’s prohibition against turning in Scientologists to the law.
READ MORE
 
"I guess you noticed I had more concern/attention/dedication/interest, etc., on this film than any other.​
That is because I think it is the one tech film that can and will, all by itself, change the face of Scientology.​
Of course, every film is important for tech to be in. But when I look at Scientology a hundred or a thousand
years down the road, it will succeed or not based on the use of confessional technology. It is the one thing​
that can stop case gain cold. That is why I felt it was so important."​
David Miscavige, 1994
(Underground Bunker substack)

I have to wonder how much Dave was still a true believer by 1994. Or is a true believer, or not, today.

By 1994, most of all the major secrets had already spilled
out into all the halls of upper management and to DM himself:
  • Michael Flynn's court case in the early 80's and the revelations from all of Hubbard's personal papers
  • LRH deteriorated mentally and physically . . . suddenly died in '86 and what to do next
  • Three raids on Pat Broeker's locations in search of the missing upper OT levels
  • DM knew he had to fabricate the rest of the upper bridge from thin air
  • Isolating Pat Broeker, possibly blackmailing him, and tossing him out
  • How to handle the Mithoff memory problem and authorship of "fake" OT8
  • Fair-gaming former Senior CS Int David Mayo to the ends of earth
  • Getting people to pay for OT 9&10 when they don't exist around the early 90's
  • Many unsanctioned, detailed, and truthful LRH bios had been written and released in the 80's
  • The Omar Garrison LRH bio had been written, paid for, and hidden away forever
  • Etc., etc., etc. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I just wonder how someone, anyone, could be a believer in any of this after seeing
and living through all those events and hundreds more. :unsure:
 
"I guess you noticed I had more concern/attention/dedication/interest, etc., on this film than any other.​
That is because I think it is the one tech film that can and will, all by itself, change the face of Scientology.​
Of course, every film is important for tech to be in. But when I look at Scientology a hundred or a thousand
years down the road, it will succeed or not based on the use of confessional technology. It is the one thing​
that can stop case gain cold. That is why I felt it was so important."​
David Miscavige, 1994​
(Underground Bunker substack)

I have to wonder how much Dave was still a true believer by 1994. Or is a true believer, or not, today.

By 1994, most of all the major secrets had already spilled
out into all the halls of upper management and to DM himself:
  • Michael Flynn's court case in the early 80's and the revelations from all of Hubbard's personal papers
  • LRH deteriorated mentally and physically . . . suddenly died in '86 and what to do next
  • Three raids on Pat Broeker's locations in search of the missing upper OT levels
  • DM knew he had to fabricate the rest of the upper bridge from thin air
  • Isolating Pat Broeker, possibly blackmailing him, and tossing him out
  • How to handle the Mithoff memory problem and authorship of "fake" OT8
  • Fair-gaming former Senior CS Int David Mayo to the ends of earth
  • Getting people to pay for OT 9&10 when they don't exist around the early 90's
  • Many unsanctioned, detailed, and truthful LRH bios had been written and released in the 80's
  • The Omar Garrison LRH bio had been written, paid for, and hidden away forever
  • Etc., etc., etc. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I just wonder how someone, anyone, could be a believer in any of this after seeing
and living through all those events and hundreds more. :unsure:
It's the same as politics, which is, not uncoincidentally, increasingly cult mind-based. Those too invested to face the embarrassment of backpedaling will rationalize fantastically, cite flaky sources and see what they want to see, short of having and reaching a breaking point.
 
It's the same as politics, which is, not uncoincidentally, increasingly cult mind-based. Those too invested to face the embarrassment of backpedaling will rationalize fantastically, cite flaky sources and see what they want to see, short of having and reaching a breaking point.
So, you say DM is still a believer? That was my question, LOL.
 
So, you say DM is still a believer? That was my question, LOL.
No actually, I'm not thinking of him. I've never seen or heard anything beyond his self-serving public pronouncements that shows any feelings or beliefs about "the tech", only an obsession with effective public displays, and a distrust and intolerance of and for all the people who answer to him. His lashing out at all of them is merely condescending and degrading, and devoid of any mention of violating any of Hubbard's policies or "tech" points, nor is there ever any praise for upholding or acting in accordance with these.
 
Back
Top