California Governor Gavin Newsom Adds Convicted Scientologist Felon David Gentile to His Official “Trump Criminals” Ledger

J. Swift

Well-known member
Screenshot 2026-06-18 143213.webp


Above: Photo of convicted felon and Scientologist from Governor Gavin Newsom’s “Trump Criminals” Website

On June 16, 2026, the Office of Governor Gavin Newsom published the fourth installment of a running state-government tracker it calls “Trump Criminals.” The page catalogs people who have received pardons, commutations, and other favorable treatment from President Trump, and it frames the whole exercise around a single accounting question: when a court orders a convicted fraudster to repay his victims, who is left holding the bill after the President erases that obligation?

One of the names on the updated list is David Gentile, the founder and former chief executive of GPB Capital Holdings, and a longtime Scientologist. I have been documenting Gentile since 2019, and the commutation that put him back on the street is ground I have covered at length.

What is new is the venue: a sitting governor’s office has now entered GPB Capital’s founder into an official state roster of the President’s clemency beneficiaries. That is worth noting, but a political press release is not a source. It is a tip. Below is what the underlying record actually establishes, verified against court filings, the Bureau of Prisons, the Department of Justice’s clemency record, and contemporaneous reporting rather than against the Governor’s framing.

What the record shows about Gentile

On August 6, 2024, a federal jury in the Eastern District of New York convicted Gentile on five counts: conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, securities fraud, and two counts of wire fraud. According to the New York Times, the jury returned its verdict after deliberating for roughly four hours. He was tried and convicted alongside Jeffry Schneider, the owner of the marketing firm Ascendant Capital, which sold GPB’s funds to retail investors.

The conviction grew out of a years-long scheme. Prosecutors established that GPB raised on the order of $1.6 billion from more than 10,000 investors and then used new investor capital to fund the monthly distributions it represented to existing investors as returns generated by the underlying businesses. Many of those investors were ordinary retirement savers and seniors on fixed incomes.

Gentile was sentenced in May 2025 to seven years in federal prison. He reported to custody on November 14, 2025. On December 1, 2025, President Trump commuted the sentence. According to the Bureau of Prisons, Gentile was out of custody within roughly two weeks of reporting — on the order of twelve days served against an eighty-four-month sentence.

I cannot tell you what private representations were made to the President or his clemency apparatus in advance of that decision. What the public record shows is that the President’s informal clemency adviser, Alice Marie Johnson, publicly welcomed the release, and that White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Gentile by asserting that GPB had disclosed to investors in 2015 the possibility that distributions might be paid from investor capital, and that the government had failed to tie any fraudulent representation to Gentile personally.

That defense is difficult to square with the verdict. A unanimous jury found Gentile guilty beyond a reasonable doubt on five counts including securities fraud and wire fraud. The same arguments the White House advanced — inadequate proof, prosecutorial misconduct — were raised by Gentile’s own lawyers in pretrial motions and rejected by Judge Rachel Kovner in March. The claim that prosecutors could not connect a fraudulent representation to the defendant is not a characterization the trial record supports; it is one the trial record contradicts.

The financial penalty the commutation erased

The detail that elevates this from a routine commutation to an accountability story is financial, and it is the same detail the Governor’s tracker leads with.

Gentile’s conviction carried roughly $15.5 million in financial penalties owed in connection with the fraud. When the formal commutation warrant became public in early December 2025, it confirmed that the President’s grant did not merely shorten the prison term — it relieved Gentile of that obligation as well. I want to be precise about the figure, because the public record is not perfectly consistent: some accounts describe the roughly $15.5 million as restitution to victims, while Politico reported that the commutation relieved Gentile of approximately $15 million that prosecutors were seeking in forfeiture.

The distinction between restitution and forfeiture matters, and it is worth pinning down as the paperwork is parsed. What is not in dispute is the direction of the result: a court-ordered route for clawing money back from the fraud was closed.

This is the mechanism Governor Newsom’s office is trying to make legible to the public, and on the mechanism, the office is correct: a commutation or pardon can do more than open a cell door. It can also wipe out the court-ordered repayment that was the system’s formal route for returning stolen money to the people it was taken from.

The Governor’s office puts the cumulative figure across all of the President’s clemency actions at nearly $2 billion in restitution, forfeitures, and fines. I treat that aggregate as the Governor’s claim, not as an established number — some of those figures reflect amounts prosecutors sought rather than balances outstanding at the moment of clemency, and some may be joint-and-several obligations appearing on more than one defendant’s ledger. The penalty attached to Gentile, by contrast, is documented in his own commutation paperwork.

It should also be said that the federal criminal penalty is not the only money in play. After Gentile was charged, GPB’s remaining assets went under a court-appointed receiver, and according to court filings roughly $400 million from liquidated holdings has been returned to investors through a civil claims process independent of the criminal case. More than $700 million remains owed. The President’s commutation touches none of that. It closed one channel; the receivership grinds on.

The Scientology Question

Gentile is a longtime Scientologist. I have reported that since 2019, and the characterization is not mine alone — Tracey McManus of the Tampa Bay Times has documented the overlap between Scientologist-owned ventures and the Clearwater real-estate buying spree of that era, and the connection has been a feature of the GPB story through every stage of the case. So the description in this article’s headline is not an epithet. It is a documented fact.

What I cannot tell you is that Scientology, as an institution, engineered Gentile’s commutation. The record does not establish that, and I am not going to assert it. What the record does show is a set of facts that sit uncomfortably next to one another.

First, the Gentile-GPB-Scientology ties were never raised in court. But the New York Times has reported, citing three people familiar with the investigation, that federal investigators questioned witnesses about those ties before trial. The subject was live for prosecutors even if it never reached a jury.

Second, there is the asymmetry of the clemency itself. Gentile and Jeffry Schneider were convicted in the same scheme, tried together, and sentenced weeks apart — Gentile to seven years, Schneider to six. The President commuted Gentile and freed him after twelve days. He did nothing for Schneider, who remains in prison serving his term. Gentile is a wealthy, lifelong Scientologist. Schneider is not. That disparity does not prove a motive, and I am careful to say so. But it is exactly the kind of documented asymmetry that an honest investigation is obligated to notice rather than wave away, and it raises a question the White House has not answered: who pushed for this commutation, and why this defendant and not his partner?

Third, the Church of Scientology has placed a denial on the record. Its spokesman, David Bloomberg, told the New York Times that there was no involvement whatsoever from the church in the commutation. I report the denial because it belongs in the record. I also note that it answers a narrower question than the one the case actually poses. A denial of institutional involvement in the clemency decision is not an account of who did seek it, and the Times itself reported that it was not clear whether Gentile had any connection to the President or his associates, nor who had advocated for his release.

That is where the bounded conclusion sits. I cannot prove that Gentile’s faith bought his freedom. What the record shows is a longtime Scientologist who walked out of federal prison after twelve days while his non-Scientologist co-defendant stayed behind bars, a clemency no one has explained, a financial penalty erased, and a pre-trial investigative interest in his Scientology ties that never surfaced at trial. Those facts do not resolve the question. They are why the question is legitimate.

What the commutation did not touch

A clemency grant is not a universal solvent, and two points of accountability survive it.

First, the conviction itself stands. A commutation reduces or ends a sentence; it does not vacate the jury’s verdict. Gentile remains a convicted securities and wire fraudster — which is why the headline word is accurate. In practical effect, by erasing both the remaining sentence and the financial penalty while leaving only the formal conviction in place, the commutation functions close to a full pardon. It is a pardon in everything but name.

Second, the federal commutation has no effect on the parallel civil case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who sued Gentile and his co-defendants in 2021. That matter remains pending, and people familiar with it have indicated the commutation does not alter its merits. Between the James litigation and the receivership, the state and civil tracks are now where whatever recovery remains for GPB’s investors will have to come from.

David Gentile’s convicted co-defendant Jeffry Schneider remains in prison and his motion for compassionate release was denied by US District Judge Rachel Kovner on June 2, 2026.

Jeffry Schneider argued that it was not fair that David Gentile had his prison sentence commuted and that he has to remain in prison for the full six years of his sentence. The question of why Gentile was commuted and Schneider was not is a matter Trump’s spokesperson Karoline Leavitt never addressed.

Schneider certainly has an opportunity to work with the Feds and give them reasons to shorten his sentence. Schneider knows GPB Capital’s former CFO Michael Cohn cooperated after his arrest and never did prison time.

Why the listing matters

I want to be careful about what the Newsom tracker is and is not. It is a political communication produced by an elected official who is, by his own account, responding to a Department of Justice investigation he regards as retaliatory. Its factual claims about Gentile are accurate because they happen to track the court record, not because they appear on a government website. Notably, the tracker lists Gentile strictly as a financial criminal; it makes nothing of his Scientology — that part of the story remains ours to carry.

What is genuinely notable is that Senator Ruben Gallego and eight other US Senators sent President Trump a signed letter demanding the President explain his travesty of justice in commuting Gentile’s commutation. An excerpt from the letter:

“Mr. President, the commutation of David Gentile’s sentence is legally indefensible, morally reprehensible, and a crushing blow to the thousands of victims whose lives he destroyed. A federal jury convicted him after a lengthy trial. A federal judge sentenced him and your own appointed prosecutor declared the sentence just. Yet after twelve days—less time than many Americans spend on vacation—you determined that justice had been sufficiently served,” the Senators wrote. “The victims of this fraud—the teachers, veterans, nurses, farmers, elderly retirees, families of disabled children, and nonprofit organizations—will not recover from this decision. They will not regain their lost savings. They will not reclaim their financial security. They will not forget that when they needed their government to stand with them against the man who stole their futures, their President chose to stand with the criminal instead.”
A United States senator placed a formal protest of the Gentile commutation on the congressional record on December 12, 2025. A state governor’s office has now entered Gentile into an official, ongoing public ledger of the President’s clemency beneficiaries. Two arms of government are building a durable, citable record of a clemency decision the executive branch would plainly prefer to let fade. For an investigation like this one, that durability is the point. The GPB story did not end when Gentile walked out of prison after twelve days. The James case is live, the receivership is live, Schneider is still in prison asking why he was left there, and the public record of how the criminal accountability was dismantled is now larger than it was.

I will keep following the threads — the James litigation, the receivership distributions, Schneider’s filings, and the still-unanswered question of who reached into the White House on behalf of a convicted Scientologist fraudster and got him home in twelve days. The commutation rewrote the federal ending. It did not rewrite the underlying facts, and it did not retire the questions.

*Sourcing note: the conviction, sentence, custody dates, financial penalty, receivership figures, and the Church spokesman’s statement in this piece are drawn from filings and press materials of the Eastern District of New York, the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, the Department of Justice clemency record, and contemporaneous reporting by the New York Times, NBC News, CNN, and Bloomberg. The roughly $15.5 million penalty is described as restitution in some accounts and as forfeiture sought by prosecutors in the New York Times’s reporting; that distinction is flagged in the text rather than resolved. The aggregate clemency figures are attributed to the Office of the Governor of California and are not independently adopted here. Gentile’s identification as a Scientologist reflects reporting by The Scientology Money Project and the Tampa Bay Times.
 
Back
Top