The problem with Jack Horner is that he would have split the Bridge with his own copyrights. One example is the "self claimed Hubbard" Andreas Buttler. He developed "Sperianism". Latter said his tech was flubed and avandoned it all. Now he is suing people commenting on him. If Buttler invalidated all his tech. Just imagine the coplications if every collaborator of Hubbard claimed ownership of their share? How many collaborators would be sueing scientologists over the use of their contributions and processes to The Bridge?
That is why he must remain Source.
Yes. I remember that gigant photo in the golden frame at my Class IV Org.
So, we can agree that the R6 bank "iconology" was a success.
Sure, Hubbard didn't gave a real OT 8 level, but that doesn't mean the Bridge is not there. Bill Robertson (allegedly on telepathic comm with Hubbard) developed OT 8 (Excalubur) and the next levels in his Ron's Org.
Hubbard himself explains how Scientology has many contributions dating back to millenia. But Scientology has remained a single subject thanks to Hubbard being the Source of it.
Do you have any information on Jack Horner and copyrighting? I've not heard mention of it before with regard to him.
I spoke with Jack Horner a number of times in 1983 and 1984. Horner just wanted to be left alone to run his center, but was relentlessly, covertly and overtly, attacked by Scientology's spying and dirty tricks bureau following Hubbard's instructions.
I've read the confidential internal machinations re. Horner which targeted him. He was viciously attacked and posed no threat.
The idea of "Source" is fraudulent, so how is it "ethical" to continue that fraud?
At what point in their ascension, up the Hubbard Chart of Awareness Characteristics, are Scientologists able to confront the truth about Scientology?
Scientology is only a "success" in that it attains the self-aggrandizing objective Hubbard envisioned in his August 1938
Excalibur letter to his wife.
Scientology is not a success in other ways to any significant degree.
It exists as a monument to Hubbard with Scientologists being the caretakers.
The subject is both incomplete and booby trapped. By all means acknowledge the good parts, but also acknowledge Hubbard's hidden agenda and ulterior motives.
You haven't addressed the problem of Scientology Ethics being illegitimate, and without Justification, in light of the massive amount of fraud and deception in Scientology.
And I see that you believe an assortment of Hubbard/G.O./OSA generated tall tales, starting with Scientology stopping the building of gulags in Alaska, etc. Those beliefs might justify Scientology Ethics partly, but with no actual Bridge to Total Freedom, it's a tough sell.