TOP SUPER-STUPID MOMENTS IN SCIENTOLOGY (PART V)

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

.


Isn't this false advertising?

I mean...what's the OT VIII EP origination? "I now know who I'm not and am willing to find out"...or something?

That means you can do the entirety of what's available in Scientology, right now, and, specifically, NOT know yourself. You'd just be willing to find out!!!
.

I think the "End Phenomena" of OT VIII is just as you indicated, but worded by the cult as:

" I NOW KNOW WHO I AM NOT AND AM
INTERESTED TO FIND OUT WHO I AM "

How this is considered an "ABILITY ATTAINED" is beyond the realm of human imagination, reason and sanity itself.

This would be like Scientology selling bogus road maps for $600,000 to tourists—who then promptly get lost, after which they write the following success story:

" I NOW KNOW WHERE I AM NOT AND AM
INTERESTED TO FIND OUT WHERE I AM "

I can see where that would not be a scam. Because the tourist did in fact acquire the newfound "ability" to be interested to solve the problem that Scientology failed to help them solve. LOL.


.
 
Last edited:

ILove2Lurk

AI Chatbot
. . . is beyond the realm of human imagination, reason and sanity itself.
:LOL::LOL::LOL:
I laugh out loud (line charge) every time I read this line. Such a perfect description of the whole panorama of scientology.

How did we do it for so long? That's "beyond the realm" too.
 

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

:LOL::LOL::LOL:
I laugh out loud (line charge) every time I read this line. Such a perfect description of the whole panorama of scientology.

How did we do it for so long? That's "beyond the realm" too.
.

LOL!


ANSWER
As per our previous discussions and other related R&D,
the basic "WHY" for getting crazy glued into a cult love jones
is unrequited ARC and the powers of
IMAGINATION!



". . . it was just my 'magination—running a-way with me!"


.





 
Last edited:

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

NOMINATED AS ONE OF SCIENTOLOGY'S
STUPIDEST PIECES OF TECHNOLOGY


the
"DEMONSTRATION"
It comes in many forms.

The DEMONSTRATION done with clay. . .

The DEMONSTRATION done with paper clips and used batteries. . .

The DEMONSTRATION done with graphic schematics. Here's one from "The Scientology Handbook" that will fully simplify & explain to you how life really works. . .




Except that after you look at any of Scientology's purportedly
"illustrative" graphics, you will be left scratching
your head and wondering. . .
WTF ARE THESE CULT FREAKS TALKING ABOUT?!

Look at that graphic again. Can anyone explain or at least
offer a theory of what they are trying to communicate?

What the hell do all those arrows represent?!

Why is there a Scientologist standing
behind the seated girl, staring creepily at
the back of her meat body's head?

And seriously--why is there a stupid glass vase
with a stupid yellow flower in the middle
of the stupid red arrows?!

.
 
Last edited:

Reyne Mayer

Pansexual Revolutionary
WTF ARE THESE CULT FREAKS TALKING ABOUT?!
okay, so i figure from the dotted arrows that girl sitting down is twice as interested in the boy in the picture, as she is in the cute redhead behind her.

the solid arrow means that the readhead is getting it on with the boy -- but there's no sign of her reciprocating the other girl's interest. the double arrows mean that the girl sitting has gotten it on a lot with the boy in the past.

and, the sitting girl is hiding the hand that would have a ring on it, indicating that she and the boy are the primary relationship but that is currently on break.

so it all seems like a typically mixed and ambiguous polyamorous situation from my perspective.

do i pass?!
 

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
okay, so i figure from the dotted arrows that girl sitting down is twice as interested in the boy in the picture, as she is in the cute redhead behind her.

the solid arrow means that the readhead is getting it on with the boy -- but there's no sign of her reciprocating the other girl's interest. the double arrows mean that the girl sitting has gotten it on a lot with the boy in the past.

and, the sitting girl is hiding the hand that would have a ring on it, indicating that she and the boy are the primary relationship but that is currently on break.

so it all seems like a typically mixed and ambiguous polyamorous situation from my perspective.

do i pass?!
.

LOL LOL LOL

In recognition of that insightful in-depth analysis, we just now shipped you a massive 3-tier bowling trophy!

The last terminal we gave such a prestigious award to wrote a glowing success story, mentioning that when others saw the jumbo trophy their status had soared into such high affluence that Scientologists spontaneously began sending them power flows on this planet! (so you've got that goin' for you)

.
 
Last edited:

Operating DB

3 feet behind my butt
.

NOMINATED AS ONE OF SCIENTOLOGY'S
STUPIDEST PIECES OF TECHNOLOGY


the
"DEMONSTRATION"
It comes in many forms.

The DEMONSTRATION done with clay. . .

The DEMONSTRATION done with paper clips and used batteries. . .

The DEMONSTRATION done with graphic schematics. Here's one from "The Scientology Handbook" that will fully simplify & explain to you how life really works. . .




Except that after you look at any of Scientology's purportedly
"illustrative" graphics, you will be left scratching
your head and wondering. . .
WTF ARE THESE CULT FREAKS TALKING ABOUT?!

Look at that graphic again. Can anyone explain or at least
offer a theory of what they are trying to communicate?

What the hell do all those arrows represent?!

Why is there a Scientologist standing
behind the seated girl, staring creepily at
the back of her meat body's head?

And seriously--why is there a stupid glass vase
with a stupid yellow flower in the middle
of the stupid red arrows?!

.
And why is the lighting awful and the props of sucky quality and cringy?
 

Reyne Mayer

Pansexual Revolutionary
In recognition of that insightful in-depth analysis, we just now shipped you a massive 3-tier bowling trophy!
thanks, i'm honored.

on the subject of complex sexual situations, it also occurs to me that it could be an historical diagram of what went on at Jack's "Parsonage", say with Ron and the highly sexed Northrop sisters.
 

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

And why is the lighting awful and the props of sucky quality and cringy?
.
LOL

ANSWER: Because despite cosmic claims to the contrary, L. Ron Hubbard and his management, ministers, marauders and madmen—actually have very low havingness.

.
 

Reyne Mayer

Pansexual Revolutionary
And why is the lighting awful and the props of sucky quality and cringy?
it looks to me like typical 70s/80s commercial advertising values:


which is one of those things that when you really think it through, in being more or less typical or average, doesn't say much for a group claiming to represent the apogee of human ability, based on highly advanced ancient civilizations....
 

Chuck J.

"Austere Religious Scholar"
And why is the lighting awful and the props of sucky quality and cringy?
First thing I asked myself when I saw some super seeekrit Hubbard tech films. Man, that's some BAD production values.

The cult stuff that I saw was maybe only a step and a half above Plan 9 From Outer Space as far as production values.
But I have enormous respect for Ed Wood, he was a Marine who stormed the beach at Tarawa, probably the bloodiest battle in WW2. So, he has a pass to make all the under-financed bad movies he wants.

Hubbard's had all the money he needed, all the slaves he needed to work on his stuff and it's still bad.
 
Last edited:

Reyne Mayer

Pansexual Revolutionary
But I have enormous respect for Ed Wood, he was a Marine who stormed the beach at Tarawa, probably the bloodiest battle in WW2. So, he has a pass to make all the under-financed bad movies he wants.

hate to break it to you, but i looked him up partly because i remember hearing something interesting about gender identity issues, and it turns out that he was a somewhat Hubbard-like fabulist regading his military career:

Although Wood reportedly claimed to have faced strenuous combat, including having his front teeth knocked out by a Japanese rifleman, his military records reveal this to be false; apart from recovering bodies on Betio following the Battle of Tarawa, and experiencing minor Japanese bombing raids on Betio and the Ellice Islands, a recurring filariasis infection left him performing clerical work for the remainder of his enlistment, and his dental extractions were carried out over several months by Navy dentists, unconnected to any combat. Wood had fake teeth that he would slip out from his mouth when he wanted to make his wife Kathy laugh, showing her a big toothless grin.[10][11][12] Wood later claimed (erroneously or otherwise) that he feared being wounded in battle more than he feared being killed, mainly because he was afraid a combat medic would discover him wearing a pink bra and panties under his uniform during the Battle of Tarawa.
Ed Wood - Wikipedia
 
Last edited:

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

First thing I asked myself when I saw some super seeekrit Hubbard tech films. Man, that's some BAD production values. The cult stuff that I saw was maybe only a step and a half above Plan 9 From Outer Space as far as production values. Hubbard's had all the money he needed, all the slaves he needed to work on his stuff and it's still bad.

But what about Ron's professional photographs as were published in the SCIENTOLOGY HANDBOOK?

From what I can see, he's got some serious chops in the props department! Check out this state of the art set design work!!


I mean that's some advanced looking hydraulics system for pumping in Zipply Cola, you have to agree. I can't even imagine how Dr. Hubbard pulled off such hyper-realism! I am baffled and left to conclude that Ron must have been pioneering some advanced CGI tech long before Hollywood even knew about it.

.


.
 

guanoloco

As-Wased
.




But what about Ron's professional photographs as were published in the SCIENTOLOGY HANDBOOK?

From what I can see, he's got some serious chops in the props department! Check out this state of the art set design work!!


I mean that's some advanced looking hydraulics system for pumping in Zipply Cola, you have to agree. I can't even imagine how Dr. Hubbard pulled off such hyper-realism! I am baffled and left to conclude that Ron must have been pioneering some advanced CGI tech long before Hollywood even knew about it.

.


.
Typical Hu666ard - everything is a scam...even the cola companies. Plus, the ol' stim-response conglom WOGs are just dupes.
 

Reyne Mayer

Pansexual Revolutionary
I mean that's some advanced looking hydraulics system for pumping in Zipply Cola, you have to agree. I can't even imagine how Dr. Hubbard pulled off such hyper-realism!
it reminds me of the way old $cn buildings had Dianetics on one side and Scientology on the other, trying to deceive customers with the illusion they were different when in fact they lead to the same thing inside -- i think once again Dr. Hubbard's Freudian slip is showing.

and some of the old school buildings that remained as relics from the 80s used the very same dated color schemes as in that photo until quite recently, like Chicago:

000temp-upload.jpg
 

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

it reminds me of the way old $cn buildings had Dianetics on one side and Scientology on the other, trying to deceive customers with the illusion they were different when in fact they lead to the same thing inside -- i think once again Dr. Hubbard's Freudian slip is showing. and some of the old school buildings that remained as relics from the 80s used the very same dated color schemes as in that photo until quite recently, like Chicago:

View attachment 15510
.



Badly dated color scheme--hell yeah!

However, an epic scale missed opportunity. . .

In the late 80s the Church of Scientology could have purchased
all 9000 retail branches of a famously failed retail giant for
just pennies on the dollar, via bankruptcy court.



Prime locations! And the cult would not even have to change their color motif!

All they'd need to do is slightly reconfigure those signs and rename it. . .



MOVIE RENTALS.......OT LEVELS
What's the difference really?
They both sell fictional visual scenarios that only require
suspension of disbelief to become satisfyingly entertaining!


.
 
Last edited:

Chuck J.

"Austere Religious Scholar"
hate to break it to you, but i looked him up partly because i remember hearing something interesting about gender identity issues, and it turns out that he was a somewhat Hubbard-like fabulist regading his military career:

Ed Wood - Wikipedia
That sucks.
Why can't people tell the truth about their military experiences?
It's easy.

I refueled airplanes.
See, that was easy.
 
Top