Well, I was a scientologist for several years, and when I had sex it was certainly 'for pleasure', and all the other young scientologists that I knew at the time were having sex with their partners 'for pleasure' one imagines, so I think the answer to your question is, no.Quote: " Scientologist don't have sex for pleasure". Is that true? Just read it somwhere...
Not my experience. Scientologists like getting laid as much as anybody else.Quote: " Scientologist don't have sex for pleasure". Is that true? Just read it somwhere...
Somwhere on the internet. Was looking for sci childhood and somhow ended up on a page with that statement. It might be a joke, i didn't read through.Not my experience. Scientologists like getting laid as much as anybody else.
Where did you read that?
During his very advanced upper level research, L. Ron Hubbard discovered that destructive creatures invented sex to shrink people: Link to Pain and Sex HCOBSomwhere on the internet. Was looking for sci childhood and somhow ended up on a page with that statement. It might be a joke, i didn't read through.
Scientology fucks with your mind so you can’t fuck. You can’t even choke your chicken.Quote: " Scientologist don't have sex for pleasure". Is that true? Just read it somwhere...
Scientology likes finding out things they can make you guilty over, so they can extract an "amends project" from you.During his very advanced upper level research, L. Ron Hubbard discovered that destructive creatures invented sex to shrink people: Link to Pain and Sex HCOB
Link to HCOB: Second Dynamic Form - Sample question: "Have you ever violated LRH tech or policies on the subject of the second dynamic?"
Link to Adult Security Check (scroll to under the Children's Security Check. Note: Children are under age 12). Sample question: "Have you ever done anything your mother would be ashamed to find out about?"
Second Dynamic Security Check Questions:
![]()
No, this is generally not true. There are some sex acts which are taboo as they are considered harmful to an unborn child or to a person's mind, but that's about it. And what Scientologists consider to be off-limits, "perverted" behavior varies.Quote: " Scientologist don't have sex for pleasure". Is that true? Just read it somwhere...
People who give personal information to Scientology may find that, if someday they are regarded as "trouble sources" by Scientology, the information (from interrogation lists such as these, plus drug items from their "Drug Rundown") may be used to smear or harass them, or intimidate them into silence.Scientology likes finding out things they can make you guilty over, so they can extract an "amends project" from you.
How did post-1982 Scientologists rationalize Hubbard's Pain and Sex HCOB?No, this is generally not true. There are some sex acts which are taboo as they are considered harmful to an unborn child or to a person's mind, but that's about it. And what Scientologists consider to be off-limits, "perverted" behavior varies.
Scientology is a very 1950s "Leave it to Beaver" conservative outfit. So missionary sex with your husband is kind of ok, but anything else can get you into "ethics" trouble.Quote: " Scientologist don't have sex for pleasure". Is that true? Just read it somwhere...
That is not quite accurate. When I was on the RPF I was allowed to spend a limited amount of time with my wife once a week. The trouble with that of course, was that looking at your watch and saying 'well, it's time to have sex now' isn't really how that stuff is supposed to work is it?Scientology is a very 1950s "Leave it to Beaver" conservative outfit. So missionary sex with your husband is kind of ok, but anything else can get you into "ethics" trouble.
For the Sea Org, there's the added rule of "having children is not allowed".
For the RPF there is the: "No sex whatsoever, even having sexual thoughts is misconduct".
Really? Wow, I thought that would be considered off-purpose to focus on 2D, when you are supposed to be all about 4D and 3D. I do not recall anyone even mention conjugal visits on the RPF in WUS.That is not quite accurate. When I was on the RPF I was allowed to spend a limited amount of time with my wife once a week. The trouble with that of course, was that looking at your watch and saying 'well, it's time to have sex now' isn't really how that stuff is supposed to work is it?
The RPF that I knew and the one I read about here on exscn are two different beasts. A poster who seems to have dropped out of sight over the last four or five years, one Dart Smohen, wrote reams about it on the old board so you can search there, although I have to say that although he seems to have been held in great esteem, a lot of what he said was pure moonshine, believe me. I know that because I was on the RPF with him. He even told lies about me and actually named me personally in his posts here before I'd even heard of exscn, so I know he was being mendacious.Really? Wow, I thought that would be considered off-purpose to focus on 2D, when you are supposed to be all about 4D and 3D. I do not recall anyone even mention conjugal visits on the RPF in WUS.
Then again, I was never on the RPF myself. Maybe that's just another misconception I had about it. The RPF was not exactly a popular topic for chit-chat.
Welcome to the club. There's an ex-SO person (no not gonna name&shame but let me just say it was not Dart) that has a video interview on youtube where he/she talks about pretty much his/her whole life in scientology. I found that interview interesting, right to the point when, along with some other people, I get mentioned by name and surname with some false story attached to it.The RPF that I knew and the one I read about here on exscn are two different beasts. A poster who seems to have dropped out of sight over the last four or five years, one Dart Smohen, wrote reams about it on the old board so you can search there, although I have to say that although he seems to have been held in great esteem, a lot of what he said was pure moonshine, believe me. I know that because I was on the RPF with him. He even told lies about me and actually named me personally in his posts here before I'd even heard of exscn, so I know he was being mendacious.
Again: Maybe it is a different era, or maybe you had it different on the other side of the pond. Or maybe its just me not being personally familiar with the RPF.One thing he did say about our RPF was that we were held in awe by most of the regular staff and they got out of our way if they saw us coming. That bit was true anyway.
I'm pretty sure I can imagine how it happened: Tom Cruise said something about sex in his auditing session. This got into his files. Someone (Davey? Tom's C/S) read it and considered it an outpoint on N.Boniadi's part. So Tommy Davis was given an excerpt from that transcript with some sort of: "Go fix it" order.I guess first of all...what did she think of Tommy Davis knowing about the sexual activities of her and Tom Cruise?
How did Tommy Davis know? Isn't that a bit weird? Even perverted....
I can't speak for Dave, but the question "is Scientology interested in your sex life?" is one of those "Do fish swim?" questions.Scientology and David Miscavage sure do like to get involved in other people's sex lives!! Is that part of Scientology?
Careful! You made a typo in the word "scientology"!So sad.....now Kidman is declared by Scientoloty as an SP.
Surely not Lee!I know girls like to talk about dick size......