Wow you actually responded.
Nobody, let alone me, lied about your statement.
You said what I asked you about. is the reason you did not respond for over a decade because I paraphrased what you said in my original post here on ESMB many ages ago? If you had asked me for your exact quote a decade ago I would have looked it up for you.
However today you courteously provided your exact words to Rathbun on his blog.
Sherb:
"I don’t at all appreciate this sort of divisive factional name-calling between the boards. I post over on ESMB occasionally in some (perhaps foolish) effort to keep the OSA minions from keeping the people there continually restimulated."
"Right now, in present time, there are OSA socks running Black Scientology on those guys to keep them stirred up against anyone who might be a threat to McSavage. At least that is my opinion."
Michael A. Hobson
Independent Scientologist
So, let's examine. . .
- - - You DID say you post on ESMB in some effort to keep the OSA minions from keeping the people there continually restimulated. That's what i said. To handle people on ESMB from being over-restimulated.
- - - You DID say there are OSA socks running Black Scientology on those guys (ESMB members). Thanks for reminding me that you claimed "Black Scientology" is being run on me and other ESMB members, I forgot to mention that.
--- You DID say that OSA minions are on ESMB stirring people up. Thats's what I said. I used the word 'sockpuppets' in stead of minions. So what? Is there a difference?
So, are you still contending that there are OSA "minions" here keeping ESMB members in state of over-restimulation?
Who are the OSA minions here?
Who is over-restimulated?
If you simply answer the questions it would end.
Or if you no longer agree with your earlier assertions, simply say you don't believe that is happening any more. Just use simple unambiguous language and others will know exactly what you are inferring or alluding to.
.