I M Dex
Well-known member
Maybe we should convene a Board of Investigation.To whoever derailed my great thread into some Trump&Hitler nonsense - shame on you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe we should convene a Board of Investigation.To whoever derailed my great thread into some Trump&Hitler nonsense - shame on you!
To whoever derailed my great thread into some Trump&Hitler nonsense - shame on you!
To whoever derailed my great thread into some Trump&Hitler nonsense - shame on you!
A Comm Ev is in order!Maybe we should convene a Board of Investigation.![]()
Perhaps, though tbh I have not observed really that much misunderstandings between just SO and staff.I guess there is also SO vs Staff
I've recommended his book for a long time as a way to understand ScientologyGood post.
I came across this dude today and thought it really explains a lot of what is going on today.
Kinda hard to remember that this guy published his book in 1951!
This article explains things a little more:
![]()
The Prophets: Eric Hoffer
In 1951, a book by an unschooled dockworker predicted the forces that would give rise to radical politics on the left, populism on the right—and a president like Donald Trump.substack.com
Published in 1951 in the shadow of World War II and the rise of the Soviet Union, Eric Hoffer’s The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements became one of President Dwight Eisenhower’s favorite books. As the former Supreme Allied Commander of European forces during World War II, Eisenhower saw firsthand the rise of mass movements and how they turn destructive. During one of the nation’s first televised presidential press conferences, Ike cited the book, turning it into a bestseller.
hi ,To whoever derailed my great thread into some Trump&Hitler nonsense - shame on you!
I mena it tongue in cheek mostly. But yeah, we have a whole "US poilitics" and "Geopolitics" and "War in Ukraine" threads for that. We have other places to discuss political stuff unrelated to scientology, all I'm saying.hi ,
good point.
it has been used for so long here.
very boring and same.
If someone thinks this is a way of "handling" posts here it is funny.
this "way" used to work on old platforms 10 , 15 years ago.
thanks
hi,I mena it tongue in cheek mostly. But yeah, we have a whole "US poilitics" and "Geopolitics" and "War in Ukraine" threads for that. We have other places to discuss political stuff unrelated to scientology, all I'm saying.
They say it was just "tongue in cheeck" ...
instead of admiting " I was passive agresive"

I think most of the never-in protesters mean well. But in their actions, they tend to be preocuppied chiefly with the well-being of other never-ins: the 'potential recruits' or the 'public-at-large'. If they think about still-ins and current SO members, it is either as foes or as an afterthought.
We ex-scientologists tend to be preocuppied chiefly the well being of former members or the still-ins.
In that sense, I feel we and the never-in protesters are often talking past each other.
When we say "some forms of protest are bad", we mean that confrontational, hostile forms of protest make current members double-down and make it harder for them to leave. That it feeds into the siege-mentality Miscavige wants to spread.
By saying "there is no bad way to protest" I believe the never-in protesters mean that "there is no bad publicity", that anything that helps spread public awareness of scientology abuses among the general public is a good thing.
I think that is the main underlying misunderstanding and that this is what OSA is trying to use as a crowbar to pull us apart.
I've been noticing a lot of zeitgeist disruption recently in the 'stop scientology abuses' village. I haven't given it any time to investigate, study or mull over--but I do notice it and sometimes wonder if this is possibly one of the very first (think operating system 2.0) times that OSA trolling, dead agenting and "third party" disruptions have ever been effective.
Kinda hard to remember that this guy published his book in 1951!
A Comm Ev is in order!
"Tongue in cheek" does not = "passive aggressive". "Tongue in cheek" simply means expressing something in a humorous and entertaining way, to make a person smile. Your characterizing Karakorum's reply as "passive-aggressive" IS passive-aggressive, and indicative of your Scientology indoctrination ("Jokers and degraders"= "1.1, covertly hostile"). Try to think for yourself instead of defaulting to what you've input.hi,
thanks for reply,
but same reply is used with "those other people"
They say it was just "tongue in cheeck" ...
instead of admiting " I was passive agresive"
(i love that frame of words)
good luck.
and I like your posts , seems like you know what you stand for!
all best from LRHs Bulgravia.
And no using an electric toothbrush, that's for upstats.I think I am the guilty party, at least one of them.
I'll save the Dev-T of a Comm Ev. I'll just go clean out a nearby dumpster with a toothbrush and apply for acceptance back into the group.
IT'S OVER.
more clickbait, or something newsworthy?


