I told you I was trouble
Suspended animation.
Who or what persuaded you to become totally obsessed by "rhetoric" to the extent that you are?what you wrote basically says we was persuaded we had a case. That's rhetoric. Well done.
Who or what persuaded you to become totally obsessed by "rhetoric" to the extent that you are?what you wrote basically says we was persuaded we had a case. That's rhetoric. Well done.
why it's quite simple Trouble, it was Hubbard reading and using Dean Wilbur book on English Rhetoric.Who or what persuaded you to become totally obsessed by "rhetoric" to the extent that you are?
why it's quite simple Trouble, it was Hubbard reading and using Dean Wilbur book on English Rhetoric.
Don't forget, trouble, you said we had no case and agreed with you..
So how do you explain it all? Was it hypnosis, was it Crowley, what was it?
It was a combination of things. Rhetoric was just one part of it.why it's quite simple Trouble, it was Hubbard reading and using Dean Wilbur book on English Rhetoric.
Don't forget, trouble, you said we had no case and I agreed with you..
So how do you explain it all? Was it hypnosis, was it Crowley, what was it?
Hubbard recurringly stated that the "bank" is made of words, in 1950, in the mid 1960s, and of course in his 1946/47 Affirmations.Who or what persuaded you to become totally obsessed by "rhetoric" to the extent that you are?
\
Hubbard recurringly stated that the "bank" is made of words, in 1950, in the mid 1960s, and of course in his 1946/47 Affirmations.
That left an impression on some..
Riddick had this right. Processing creates the "vacuum," and hyperbole and training fill the vacuum.
For Dianetic auditing when the PC starts talking about "significances" (before EP) the auditor is supposed to use TR4 to get the PC back on the C/S order for a particular AESP for that session until the PC gets "cog, VGIs, FN". Then the cognition is accepted as part of the EP ("what is true for you is true for you".)\
Hubbard recurringly stated that the "bank" is made of words, in 1950, in the mid 1960s, and of course in his 1946/47 Affirmations.
That left an impression on some.
Riddick had this right. Processing creates the "vacuum," and hyperbole and training fill the vacuum.
I don’t find rhetoric difficult to understand at all but I completely understand how you do, For years, it’s been your new religion.I know rhetoric is a difficult concept to understand, much like the word sublime, both rhetoric and sublime in philosophy are hard to understand, if you learn them, you'll see. Todays education system doesn't quite teach them. Both the rhetoric and sublime are quite simple, once you see.
There's no reason to disparage me, I 'm just saying what I see, the unknown about Hubbard and his means to create a following.
No, they are different and have different treatments, though a person can be both. Autism has a scale, too, but OCD can also be mild to severe.@JustSheila
If a person has some type of OCD does that also mean that they are autistic?
(Just curious about your opinion on that.)
Did you notice that Dean Wilbur's book did not even cover ethos, logos and pathos?why it's quite simple Trouble, it was Hubbard reading and using Dean Wilbur book on English Rhetoric.
Don't forget, trouble, you said we had no case and I agreed with you..
So how do you explain it all? Was it hypnosis, was it Crowley, what was it?
I pondered on that, Dean Wilbur called it English Rhetoric, not greek rhethoric so it was Wilburs interpretation, but it's still rhethoric on how to write and captivate a audience.Did you notice that Dean Wilbur's book did not even cover ethos, logos and pathos?
It is not a book about what you call rhetoric.
MY WIFE IS NO LONGER INVOLVED AND WANTS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.IMO, IF LRH had finally found some way in auditing to create the so-called EP of OT8 what he really would have found was some ways that would eventually lead to a person having mental hallucinations 24/7.
That's my 2 cents opinion on that item.
your comment actually implies you never had auditing. Is this true?\
Hubbard recurringly stated that the "bank" is made of words, in 1950, in the mid 1960s, and of course in his 1946/47 Affirmations.
That left an impression on some.
Riddick had this right. Processing creates the "vacuum," and hyperbole and training fill the vacuum.
I don't think you ever ever went thru a auditing session?For Dianetic auditing when the PC starts talking about "significances" (before EP) the auditor is supposed to use TR4 to get the PC back on the C/S order for a particular AESP for that session until the PC gets "cog, VGIs, FN". Then the cognition is accepted as part of the EP ("what is true for you is true for you".)
Yes, I did.I don't think you ever ever went thru a auditing session?
Inside the organization, I have received and given auditing during 1970, 1971, 1975, and 1976.your comment actually implies you never had auditing. Is this true?
Maybe cos it just doesn't bloody well work?.
.
.
That would be an "ideal" post to start a whole new thread, so let's get this party started:
WHY RON'S 100% WORKABLE TECH
DID NOT WORK ON RON
Because on the practical drills for auditor training courses,
everyone was afraid to give Ron a flunk. Thus he never
got a real pass and therefore was non-standard.
.