freethinker
Controversial
Is that Ron the Politician?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is that Ron the Politician?
I'm different. Can't wait to hear the responses to that.that doesn't make sense, if you paid into the system, why not get back something?
Unfortunately, for anybody myself included who paid into the Hubbard/scientology system, whether it be money or time reading his bullshit or being on staff, time spent, we got nothing back, no clears, no OT's.
I mean all that time I read Hubbard, and word cleared and looked up definitions, and spend time on staff going for the winning team, and sacrificing other interests because I should be an auditor or on staff, the auditor was the most valuable being on the planet, was truthfully for not, a complete waste of time for achieving the goal of a cleared planet.
In the end, it was rhetoric, I was persuaded, most thoroughly.
Logic dictates that nobody has gone clear or OT.
I was DM - LRHd = exitIs "LRHd" similar to "PDHd"? E.g. "I took a course in scientology and got LRHd."
Or "I went to the ethics Officer and she LRHd" me with conditions.
Or, "After pulling an all nighter with the reg I became LRHd and went bankrupt."
If, instead of paying Social Security, he had taken the money each week that would have gone to social security, and put it into an IRA (individual retirement account) and simply invested in mutual funds, he would be getting a cash flow much higher than SS would give him.Here's the thing, a well known FSM, Ty Dillard never paid into social security because he claimed priest exemption on his tax forms. He a few years ago told my wife she was smart to not claim SS tax exemption for he gets no Social Security and his FSM commissions have dried to nothing because nobody is "going up the bridge". He made his living FSM'ing selling the OT levels.
If you're still working, wait until full retirement age-- your SS benefits are reduced if you are making more than a pittance of earned income.just read the social security website and understand it, use math to determined if one should get it at 62 or full retirement age.
.Step 1: produce a Clear who displays ALL the advertised attributes of a Clear, as laid out in DMSMH, using any techniques you wish. But the PC must be gotten to the point of objectively demonstrating ALL the attributes that LRH laid out, and those "abilities gained" must have come FROM auditing (e.g. vision must have IMPROVED to 20/20, not already been 20/20 before)
just read the social security website and understand it, use math to determined if one should get it at 62 or full retirement age.
/
INTRO OFFER!
FOR ONE WEEK WE ARE OFFERING FREE STREAMING Q & A WITH DR. HUBBARD FROM
TARGET II. ALL ESMB MEMBER SHOULD FEEL FREE TO SEND IN THEIR QUESTIONS!
ASK RON!
![]()
.
Sir,
I don't quite agree with your statement that I have the money and you have the knowledge. I've already given you the money you asked me to give (and a couple decades as a staff member). You have not given me all the knowledge. Some knowledge, yes - about grifting, bullbaiting, sleep deprivation, bad writing and maybe a few other things. What am I not getting?
Do I have MUs?
originally posted by L. Ron Hubbard
Dear This is NOT OKAY !!!! . Yes, you do not have all the knowledge, sadly that is true. . However, on your death bed you will receive Total Freedom. So, you've got that goin' for you. .. LINK
ML,
Ron
totally understand. Many ways to look at it. The Gov is slowly turning the boat from SS into IRA and Roth accounts. One could look at the SS system as a forced savings account with bad interest or gains. But the IRA's and Roth accounts are subject to bull and bear runs in stock prices, so not stable.If, instead of paying Social Security, he had taken the money each week that would have gone to social security, and put it into an IRA (individual retirement account) and simply invested in mutual funds, he would be getting a cash flow much higher than SS would give him.
But he would have needed to keep the regges from getting their hands on it, which would be unlikely.
For people earning middle-class income, SS is a bad investment.
yep, totally agree. It depends on one's circumstances. My wife has been making income to support us, my home business shows little profit (it used to) but I get to write off about 1/2 the house expenses. So our effective tax rate is pretty low. If I wait till full retirement age, I will leave money on the table to collect a higher SS income at FRA. If I die in between, my wife will get nothing as her SS is higher, so we figured to collect what we can and save it, she will get something back from my SS.If you're still working, wait until full retirement age-- your SS benefits are reduced if you are making more than a pittance of earned income.
If you are not working, and unlikely to work full time again, start taking it. You have no assurance that Democrats will not reduce your future benefits, but they are less likely to reduce benefits of people currently taking it.
I don't think we should discuss this stuff here on HH's fine tread, so I will say no more. I tried to tie it into Hubbard's hoax on being a dedicated staff member, sea org member, public which are for not.
@PirateAndBum
I suggest that the comments on this thread about Social Security be moved to another topic thread "Social Security".
![]()
Dear Ron,
I just had a cognition!
It's all clear to me now!
And it's from your, um, your lecture, um, I'm not sure, I'll look it up later, but I'm sure you will remember.
I've had a stuck flow!
And you know how flows are, you have to reverse them from time to time to prevent a big ridge of mass and solidity, right.
So how about this?
You give me some money.
And I'll give you some knowledge!
OK, get it?
Good!
Start!