COURT OF ETHICS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JUSTIN CRAIG, AKA LRH 2.0

[TheSneakster]

Just for the record, AFAICT, this guy Gonzalez is not affiliated any known Indie or Freezone faction that I have been able to determine and has not been appointed an Ethics Officer or MAA by any of them.

So, take your pick: lone gunman type nutter or PR op from C of $ OSA or some other faction hoping to discredit Indies.

In any case, he has no authority from any Indie group to hold "Courts of Ethics", hold "Committees of Evidence" or to declare anybody a Suppressive Person such that anybody in the Independent Field has to pay him any attention at all.

Edit addendum: In fact, Gonzalez has exactly the same authority over Indies or Freezoners as Justin Craig (AKA Ron Hubbard 2.0): None.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

from wiki:
Maitreya (Sanskrit), Metteyya (Pali), is regarded as a future Buddha of this world in Buddhist eschatology. In some Buddhist literature, such as the Amitabha Sutra and the Lotus Sutra, he is referred to as Ajita.
.

.
Any time Hubbard is involved in anything, there seem to be many possible spellings.

Maitreya- - -Metteyya.

Xenu- - -could be spelled X-E-M-U.

"(Ron) is referred to as AJITA. . . could be spelled A-G-I-T-A." ​

Websters Dictionary
agita: a feeling of agitation or anxiety

.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

Self induced boner detected.

View attachment 5431

Nothing can be as nutty as a self proclaimed EO. God help the American Independent Field.

.
LOL!

Any time Scientologists get "rehabbed" on their purpose to "help Ron achieve his dream of clearing the planet" they commence to "slamming ethics in" on each other.

It's a feeding frenzy of cannibalistic piranha!

Here is a typical conversation between two (2) COS Scientologists in any Ideal Org:

Scientologist #1: "You're the WHY!"
Scientologist #2: "No way, you're the WHY!"

Scientologist #1: "You're the WHO!"
Scientologist #2: "No, you're the WHO"

Scientologist #1: "You're a DB!"
Scientologist #2: "No, you're a DB!"

Scientologist #1: "You sabotaged Ron's tech, you're a SQUIRREL!"
Scientologist #2: "No, you sabotaged Ron's tech, you're a SQUIRREL!"

Scientologist #1: "Oh yeah? Well you're an SP!"
Scientologist #1: "Oh yeah? You're the real SP!"

Scientologist #1: "You're declared!"
Scientologist #1: "No, you're declared!"
Indie Scientologist: "No wait, you're both declared!" ​

.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

.
LOL!

Any time Scientologists get "rehabbed" on their purpose to "help Ron achieve his dream of clearing the planet" they commence to "slamming ethics in" on each other.

It's a feeding frenzy of cannibalistic piranha!

Here is a typical conversation between two (2) Scientologists in any Ideal Org:

"You're the WHY!"
"No way, you're the WHY!"

"You're the WHO!"
"No, you're the WHO"

"You're a DB!"
"No, you're a DB!"

"You sabotaged Ron's tech, you're a SQUIRREL!
"No, you sabotaged Ron's tech, you're a SQUIRREL!

"Oh yeah? Well you're an SP!"
"Oh yeah? You're the real SP!"

"You're declared!
"No, you're declared!"
"Wait, you're both declared!" (Indie Scientologist)​

.

Just a few years ago we witnessed some of the greatest entertainment ever when we were in the GOLDEN AGE OF INDIES, with Indie King Rathbun and his ethics-slamming website "Moving On Up".

Indies came there with fire and ferocity to publish their lower ethics conditions (starting with "DOUBT") and once they had been upgraded they began to clear the planet of SPs like Miscavige.

At that time (being an anti-social personality myself) I predicted in multiple posts on this website that soon the Indie Scientologists would do what all COS Scientologists do. Attack each other with ethics slamming and KSW shaming.

And that is exactly what happened within 1-2 years. The holiest Indies (blown COS apostates) began to slam ethics in on the Indie apostates who did not only did not KSW (Keep Scn Working), even worse--they also did not KIW (Keep Indies Working).

As I predicted (which I still have not received a jumbo medallion nor a parade for) one or more of the top Indies would begin attacking the King of Indies Rathbun! And, so it happened.

Then The King of the Indies attacked the attackers and (for good measure) began to attack the Indies too!

Finally the King of the Indies put on a new brown blazer and did an entire series of YouTube videos attacking Indies and Ex Scientologists and Critics and Whistleblowers and everyone else that he was instructed to hate and destroy as part of his compensation package with Miscavige.

And even on this website we are treated to touring Indie ethics officers, who come here to slam ethics in.

Whenever they arrive, we should treat them with great respect and stand, face their wall photo and gratefully applaud. They are ESMBkind's only hope!

.

 

[Veda]

Oh. Such a lovely story. But clearly, John Sanborn and you are not buddhists.

Hubbard was no Buddhist. Scientology is much more Satanic than it is Buddhistic.

Aleister Crowley
Self portrait


Link to the Is Scientology Satanic? thread​

 

[Karen#1]

I did receive very credible information from inside.... that I believe.

Hymn of Asia was not written by Hubbard whatsoever. Ghost written with his signature as author.

Explains why the style is so different.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

I did receive very credible information from inside.... that I believe. Hymn of Asia was not written by Hubbard whatsoever. Ghost written with his signature as author....... Explains why the style is so different.

GHOST WRITER REVEALED!

"Yeah, I wrote Hymn of Asia. My favorite
line was that sacred-sounding refrain--
'AM I METTEYYA?' pdf
I laughed my my ass off for days when
OT's had a huge win on that bullshit!"
. ​

 

[TheSneakster]

I did receive very credible information from inside.... that I believe.

Hymn of Asia was not written by Hubbard whatsoever. Ghost written with his signature as author.

I have PM'd Janis Grady to ask her to come tell us what she knows about this assertion, given that that book was published in 1974 when she was still Hubbard's messenger, IIRC from her own book.

Explains why the style is so different.

Well of course a poem is a completely different style from prose text, no matter who the author might be. Hubbard's pulp fiction era writings (both fiction and non-fiction) that I have read are written in maybe a dozen different styles to fit the various genres and his many pen names So there is no smoking gun there.

 

[Cuitlahuac Rivas]

Hubbard was no Buddhist. Scientology is much more Satanic than it is Buddhistic.

Aleister Crowley
Self portrait


Link to the Is Scientology Satanic? thread​

"Do What Thou Wilt" is Saint Augustine's Thelema.

 

[Cuitlahuac Rivas]

I did receive very credible information from inside.... that I believe.

Hymn of Asia was not written by Hubbard whatsoever. Ghost written with his signature as author.

Explains why the style is so different.

A buddhist will understand that. Same is said to have happened with Book 1.

 

[Cuitlahuac Rivas]

GHOST WRITER REVEALED!

"Yeah, I wrote Hymn of Asia. My favorite
line was that sacred-sounding refrain--
'AM I METTEYYA?' pdf
I laughed my my ass off for days when
OT's had a huge win on that bullshit!"
. ​

Do as Thou Wilt... under love.

Saint Augustine or Crowley?

 

[Karen#1]

GHOST WRITER REVEALED!

"Yeah, I wrote Hymn of Asia. My favorite
line was that sacred-sounding refrain--
'AM I METTEYYA?' pdf
I laughed my my ass off for days when
OT's had a huge win on that bullshit!"
. ​

The information on this was leaked by Jens Bogvad RIP
He was one of the missionaries sent up to the ranch to secure all the private papers and confidential stuff that belonged to Hubbard
and had this information.
They had to grab all that was at Creston including the alleged "OT 9 and 10."

 

[Cuitlahuac Rivas]

I have PM'd Janis Grady to ask her to come tell us what she knows about this assertion, given that that book was published in 1974 when she was still Hubbard's messenger, IIRC from her own book.



Well of course a poem is a completely different style from prose text, no matter who the author might be. Hubbard's pulp fiction era writings (both fiction and non-fiction) that I have read are written in maybe a dozen different styles to fit the various genres and his many pen names So there is no smoking gun there.

Hubbard's pulp fiction era writings (both fiction and non-fiction) that I have read are written in maybe a dozen different styles to fit the various genres and his many pen names So there is no smoking gun there.

How nice of you Snikster... Do What Thou Wilt...

 

[Cuitlahuac Rivas]

The information on this was leaked by Jens Bogvad RIP
He was one of the missionaries sent up to the ranch to secure all the private papers and confidential stuff that belonged to Hubbard
and had this information.
They had to grab all that was at Creston including the alleged "OT 9 and 10."

Very kind of yours for the info...

 

[Cuitlahuac Rivas]

Hubbard was no Buddhist. Scientology is much more Satanic than it is Buddhistic.

Aleister Crowley
Self portrait


Link to the Is Scientology Satanic? thread​

Christianity is westernized buddhism. Our "very good friend" Crowley is probably resurecting buddhism when the resurected Thelema. Reference below:


Historical precedents[edit]
The word θέλημα (thelema) is rare in Classical Greek, where it "signifies the appetitive will: desire, sometimes even sexual",[9] but it is frequent in the Septuagint.[9] Early Christian writings occasionally use the word to refer to the human will,[10] and even the will of God's created faith tester and inquisitor, the Devil,[11] but it usually refers to the will of God.[12]

One well-known example is in the "Lord's Prayer", "Thy kingdom come. Thy will (θέλημα) be done, On earth as it is in heaven." It is used later in the same gospel, "He went away again a second time and prayed, saying, "My Father, if this cannot pass away unless I drink it, Thy will be done." In his 5th-century Sermon, Augustine of Hippo gave a similar instruction:[13] "Love, and what thou wilt, do." (Dilige et quod vis fac).[14]

Thelema - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Do What Thou Wilt Veda. (Dilige et quod vis fac). In Indi: प्यार करो और जैसा चाहोगे वैसा करोगे।

 

[TheSneakster]

The information on this was leaked by Jens Bogvad RIP
He was one of the missionaries sent up to the ranch to secure all the private papers and confidential stuff that belonged to Hubbard
and had this information.
They had to grab all that was at Creston including the alleged "OT 9 and 10."

Well, thank you for indicating your source.

Wise Old Goat (Michael Snoeck) has a fairly lengthy article that appears question whether Hubbard was the original author or not.

 

[Cuitlahuac Rivas]

Just for the record, AFAICT, this guy Gonzalez is not affiliated any known Indie or Freezone faction that I have been able to determine and has not been appointed an Ethics Officer or MAA by any of them.

So, take your pick: lone gunman type nutter or PR op from C of $ OSA or some other faction hoping to discredit Indies.

In any case, he has no authority from any Indie group to hold "Courts of Ethics", hold "Committees of Evidence" or to declare anybody a Suppressive Person such that anybody in the Independent Field has to pay him any attention at all.

Edit addendum: In fact, Gonzalez has exactly the same authority over Indies or Freezoners as Justin Craig (AKA Ron Hubbard 2.0): None.

LOL. Thanks for doing the OSA stuff on this Sneakster. I have to give you a VWD (Very Well Done) except on your evaluation. A "lone gunman type nutter" can not be an OSA PR op.

And as regard the "authority", you are very right... I have no more authority than Justin Craig on this. The authority comes from the original book Introduction to Scientology Ethics. That book is any scientologist duty.

Thanks Sneakster... you made my day...

 

[TheSneakster]

And as regard the "authority", you are very right... I have no more authority than Justin Craig on this. The authority comes from the original book Introduction to Scientology Ethics. That book is any scientologist duty.

In that case, it is my sad duty to assign you a Condition of Confusion, because you obviously don't know where the f*ck you are, amigo.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

.

I am not sure which is the crazier:

1. Hubbard writing HYMN OF ASIA and selling those "Ron is Mettreyya" lies.​

​

2. Hubbard having someone else write HYMN OF ASIA, claiming authorship and selling those "Ron is Mettreyya" lies.​

​

Isn't Hubbard selling lies in HYMN OF ASIA the same exact scam as Hubbard selling lies in Dianetics The Modern Science of Mental Health?

Hey Scientologists, I have a process for you! Say hello and okay (and goodbye) to Mettreyya The Bettrayya.

.

​

​

 

[Veda]

I have PM'd Janis Grady to ask her to come tell us what she knows about this assertion, given that that book was published in 1974 when she was still Hubbard's messenger, IIRC from her own book.



Well of course a poem is a completely different style from prose text, no matter who the author might be. Hubbard's pulp fiction era writings (both fiction and non-fiction) that I have read are written in maybe a dozen different styles to fit the various genres and his many pen names So there is no smoking gun there.

The book How to Live though an Executive was written by Richard DeMille along with other things, including most of Essay on Management and much of Essay on Authoritarianism.

Sara (erased wife number two) organized and wrote part of Dianetics, the Modern Science of Mental Health, and John Sanborn was Hubbard's editor and idea man, and he also wrote things which Hubbard attributed to himself.

In 1955, Sanborn was closest to Hubbard in this regard. The idea of a hoax "Russian" Manual on Psycho Politics as a means of "getting psychiatry" was from Sanborn as they both sat on the front porch of Hubbard's house in Silver Spring, Maryland in the late summer of 1955. Hubbard quickly sprang into action and dictated the "Russian" manual into a tape recorder.

The Hymn of Asia was another hoax from 1955.