A quick, easy solution to loss

[Ed8]

Missing Someone or Something, i.e. Loss

I developed a new procedure for loss. Loss consists of "persistent lost anchor-points". In scientology these are called secondaries. In Buddhism they could be called attachments, clinging, etc. A person is attached to something or someone, and loses it/them. This can be described as a lost Terminal, accompanied by what is often called in scientology a "loss of havingness".

Theory: Anchor points are half of a split into two. Their other half are viewpoints. Seeing that this is a dichotomy leads to seeing that all anchor points are abandoned viewpoints. The solution is to convert the anchor back into a viewpoint.

Requirement: For best results the client (or yourself if solo) should be able to stop being the physical body. The physical body can often have emotional breakdown over loss; this can interfere with running the process by distracting the attention. The process can still be run without separation from identification with the body, but this may require an auditor or processor.

This process is more aligned with Buddhism than other therapies. In the scientology frame of reference this process is an assist. Nothing is erased. It is also more of a spiritual process for mind and spirit, rather than a process which involves the meat body. It's in the same general area of case address as running out entities.

An example of what can be run: when a loved someone dies, and a loss is experienced, this process dissolves the 'attachment' to that person.

End Phenomenon of the process is when the person is thought of or mentioned in conversation, a calm happiness is experienced. There is no release of charge.

Technique:
1. Locate an abandoned anchor which was attached to someone or something that the client (or yourself) misses, regrets losing. 'See' the missing comm Terminal. This can be located anywhere in space, time or universe. The anchor can be attached to a point in space, or an entire object, physical body, energy body, planet, or even an entire universe. Yes, the attachment can be to a lost universe, the entire thing. But those latter are for more advanced work for people who can contact magic track, etc.. For people who are starting processing, this will be something familiar and dear to them, or hated by them, that is lost. So a home, a friend, a parent, a school as a group, etc.

2. Move to that anchor (attachment).

3. Become that anchor as your new viewpoint. Experience reality as that anchor as your personal viewpoint. This means to really experience as that lost someone or something. You become their viewpoint. This dissolves the attachment. The next step produces havingness.

4. Final action is to look from that viewpoint at yourself. This is the Ken Ogger Remote Viewpoint technique. This can occur automatically, as many people will look at themselves while holding what had been an anchor and now a viewpoint.

Anchor point vanishes. Loss vanishes. Havingness restored.​

#4 can be skipped if you wish, but I advise you to do #4.

​

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

Thanks for this one! I find this part very intriguing;

"Theory: Anchor points are half of a split into two. Their other half are viewpoints. Seeing that this is a dichotomy leads to seeing that all anchor points are abandoned viewpoints. The solution is to convert the anchor back into a viewpoint."

 

[Ed8]

Thanks for this one! I find this part very intriguing;

"Theory: Anchor points are half of a split into two. Their other half are viewpoints. Seeing that this is a dichotomy leads to seeing that all anchor points are abandoned viewpoints. The solution is to convert the anchor back into a viewpoint."

This goes back a couple decades when I noticed during processing that a fixed idea, including any form of serfac, appeared to be a 'dead' viewpoint. Took me until now to realize that an attachment was as much of a locked in place, quite dead, POV as a serfac. I am a little slow sometimes, lol.

 

[Hatshepsut]

The ser fac perspective was the immediate idea popping into my head as I read the OP. It's a universe, one that validates a viewpoint and anchors it. Plato's 'forms' might fit into these, why else such automatic recreations in our shared universes. Maybe be have shared enforced splits somewhere where we all identified with the same elements. Running Help on items representing dynamics gets the reciprocal creation and loss between viewpoint and anchor too.

In Zen Buddhism the goal is NO MIND.....or no longer identifying with ANY valence / universe. You would think without an anchor you would have no viewpoint, but this really results in PURE awareness.....a marvel, because you end up playing a game without an identity. Which game would this be?

 

[Hatshepsut]

I was watching podcast, "Thinking Allowed" and followed up one of the topics. I downloaded Dion Fortune's book about protecting yourself from psychic attack. We don't experience much of these wars between adepts today, or we don't speak of it. Not that we are aware of anyhow. But the author went into the structure and phenomena of remote viewpoints impinging and damaging her energy. She was steeped in the the 1930s perspective. I wondered if her considerations about the arresting phenomenon she fled from, were the same as remote viewpoints or a malevolent creations of another.

This week I stumbled upon another podcast which tried to explain why our ancient world sacrificed flesh to the gods. They had their shared myths of past gods which were dismembered and whose parts were scattered in the earth or cosmos. All these bits and pieces of gods....all around.....that seemingly had to be reunited ( with their origin point ? ) Not a perspective in our common age, yet for thousands of years, these viewpoints were behind tearing apart the mortal flesh.

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

I was watching podcast, "Thinking Allowed" and followed up one of the topics. I downloaded Dion Fortune's book about protecting yourself from psychic attack. We don't experience much of these wars between adepts today, or we don't speak of it. Not that we are aware of anyhow. But the author went into the structure and phenomena of remote viewpoints impinging and damaging her energy. She was steeped in the the 1930s perspective. I wondered if her considerations about the arresting phenomenon she fled from, were the same as remote viewpoints or a malevolent creations of another.

This week I stumbled upon another podcast which tried to explain why our ancient world sacrificed flesh to the gods. They had their shared myths of past gods which were dismembered and whose parts were scattered in the earth or cosmos. All these bits and pieces of gods....all around.....that seemingly had to be reunited ( with their origin point ? ) Not a perspective in our common age, yet for thousands of years, these viewpoints were behind tearing apart the mortal flesh.

I think it (psychic attack) is commoner than most of us believe - not in the way Dion Fortune describes it, perhaps, but in the energy exchanges between people, which very often have negative consequences. People drain one another's energy and dump their negativities on each other (or try to).

Paul Adams wrote a while back about how he was verbally abused by a senior CofS executive (I think it was Alex Siberski), and he found an intuitive way of just bouncing off one of the walls in the room so that Siberski's words didn't affect him.

 

[XenuHimself]

4. Final action is to look from that viewpoint at yourself. This is the Ken Ogger Remote Viewpoint technique.....
​

Too bad Ogger couldn't come up with a technique to deal with his own mental illness and avoid suicide. I think he would have been better off with a real therapist and (perhaps) medication rather than dreaming up his own imaginary LRH-inspired techniques.

 

[Ed8]

The ser fac perspective was the immediate idea popping into my head as I read the OP. It's a universe, one that validates a viewpoint and anchors it. Plato's 'forms' might fit into these, why else such automatic recreations in our shared universes. Maybe be have shared enforced splits somewhere where we all identified with the same elements. Running Help on items representing dynamics gets the reciprocal creation and loss between viewpoint and anchor too.

In Zen Buddhism the goal is NO MIND.....or no longer identifying with ANY valence / universe. You would think without an anchor you would have no viewpoint, but this really results in PURE awareness.....a marvel, because you end up playing a game without an identity. Which game would this be?

Buddhism often promotes a state of "void", which is an infinite zero, infinite nothing. 0/0
The other approach is to add infinite somethings, infinite existences. 1/0
Both achieve infinity. And since infinity is seemingly disallowed in the construction of the physical universe, either one will pop a thetan who is holding an infinity to some extent outside of the physical universe.
So the ALL MIND alternative is to add every beingness/valence/universe. In the Pali texts of Buddhism there is a sutta ( Pali word for sutra) where it is reported that Gotamo (Buddha) saw all valences/beingnesses/Terminals during his passage toward freedom.

 

[Ed8]

I was watching podcast, "Thinking Allowed" and followed up one of the topics. I downloaded Dion Fortune's book about protecting yourself from psychic attack. We don't experience much of these wars between adepts today, or we don't speak of it. Not that we are aware of anyhow. But the author went into the structure and phenomena of remote viewpoints impinging and damaging her energy. She was steeped in the the 1930s perspective. I wondered if her considerations about the arresting phenomenon she fled from, were the same as remote viewpoints or a malevolent creations of another.

This week I stumbled upon another podcast which tried to explain why our ancient world sacrificed flesh to the gods. They had their shared myths of past gods which were dismembered and whose parts were scattered in the earth or cosmos. All these bits and pieces of gods....all around.....that seemingly had to be reunited ( with their origin point ? ) Not a perspective in our common age, yet for thousands of years, these viewpoints were behind tearing apart the mortal flesh.

One of the things taught in Westerm magick is creation of 'thoughtforms', aka entities. Dion Fortune (Violet Firth) was of course an initiate and most likely knew how to make and send thoughtforms.

 

[Ed8]

I think it (psychic attack) is commoner than most of us believe - not in the way Dion Fortune describes it, perhaps, but in the energy exchanges between people, which very often have negative consequences. People drain one another's energy and dump their negativities on each other (or try to).

Paul Adams wrote a while back about how he was verbally abused by a senior CofS executive (I think it was Alex Siberski), and he found an intuitive way of just bouncing off one of the walls in the room so that Siberski's words didn't affect him.

Yelling at someone collapses the victim's space.
A technique: When someone is being verbally abused, simply reach out and hold a patch of space BEHIND the abuser's head.

 

[Hatshepsut]

Yelling at someone collapses the victim's space.
A technique: When someone is being verbally abused, simply reach out and hold a patch of space BEHIND the abuser's head.

Yeah. Bullying police officers are trained to intimidate and shrink a person in this way, when totally uncalled for. It's a psychological style of self defense.

 

[Hatshepsut]

So the ALL MIND alternative is to add every beingness/valence/universe. In the Pali texts of Buddhism there is a sutta ( Pali word for sutra) where it is reported that Gotamo (Buddha) saw all valences/beingnesses/Terminals during his passage toward freedom.

I was thinking of a similar story the other day where either Krishna or Buddha imparted the visual that it would be impossible to trace back all your karmic relationships causing those reciprocal circumstances you had found yourself in. There were millions; so many that the mind cold not grok it.

The Hermetic principal that 'all is mind' can be seen from another viewpoint. Minds are held/ generated by viewpoints, and record localized cumulative experiences. I'd wondered if a central concept of 'empathy' of some ETs wasn't just a raid or upload of mental libraries. An exterior, extradimensional consciousness is picking fruit from our trees in order to experience the individual awareness. This greater querying force might have knowing of anything..... instantly, yet it craves impressions from inside our personal universes. Consciousness is recouping lost Havingness, savoring experiences inside each domain/ valence. Must've been some big loss somewhere, causing this chronic addiction of going in to matter ( the material universes )

 

[Hatshepsut]

I think it (psychic attack) is commoner than most of us believe - not in the way Dion Fortune describes it, perhaps, but in the energy exchanges between people, which very often have negative consequences. People drain one another's energy and dump their negativities on each other (or try to).

Paul Adams wrote a while back about how he was verbally abused by a senior CofS executive (I think it was Alex Siberski), and he found an intuitive way of just bouncing off one of the walls in the room so that Siberski's words didn't affect him.

There's this thing about receiving abuse. A person's soft theta, the stuff we re-write upon gets to accept the abuser as source. Telepathic sensitivity to what the suppressor would want or not want you to be, do or have.......get felt. It causes angst. Anyone who overwhelmed when young, by a narcissistic parent, now deceased, may feel their jealousies or intentions STILL pervading their personal space.

In my imagination, I've gone into furious psychic wars with druggie co-workers who've were trying to sink my submarine. Next day upon approach, they seemed meek as lambs....downright friendly. How in the world? Did they not know I was ardently tromping them? WHAT is it we go to battle with when it comes the 'shadow work'. From a static point of view, all these conditions and attitudes are carried about accessories....as baubles.....hats....or boots.?

In our present non-Christian age, we don't have the golden rule agreed anymore. It truly seems a general amnesty has gone out for leveling the karmic grief against another. We're no longer unwilling to throw the first stone or wait for just rewards in heaven or hell. I swear the valence packages in those ominous GPMs could, independently, have their throw down in Madison Square Garden.

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

Yeah. Bullying police officers are trained to intimidate and shrink a person in this way, when totally uncalled for. It's a psychological style of self defense.

Yes, and drill sargeants in the army (think R. Lee Ermey in "Full Metal Jacket"), bullying teachers etc. It's a very well established technique for dominating people unfortunately.

I once had a difficult neighbour where I live who would drain my energy in a different way; he would bob about from side to side when talking to me and refuse to get to the point in what he was trying to say, and in that way he would pull you into the negative energy vertex that he'd created. I found that I could sometimes (but not always) lock my energy by crossing my hands over in front of my chest and pressing hard, so that he wasn't able to do it.

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

Another example of collapsing space that occurs to me is when women (especially feminist it must be said) complain about the "male gaze", i.e. men looking at them steadily and with sexual desire. From what I've seen, they seem to feel that their space is being collapsed when this happens.

 

[Hatshepsut]

Another example of collapsing space that occurs to me is when women (especially feminist it must be said) complain about the "male gaze", i.e. men looking at them steadily and with sexual desire. From what I've seen, they seem to feel that their space is being collapsed when this happens.

Naw. It's one of the narcissistic traits. Some people have an indelible incur a deep wound while the individual sense of a Self hasn't quite formed. It needs validation. Women are particularly like this, and when aging, it get worse for those around them. They will weave narratives and reconstruct history around their lives to draw in 'protective' interest and sympathy. Too many times, as a bar tender I'd dealt with women pretending someone was too interest or stalking them. It's the draw of energy into themselves that reaffirms, "I am valuable. I am not nothing and I'm important too'. The original wound may have come from feeling cheated out of having a valuable identity or any importance.

I remember when a 'suppressed PC' was queried to find the person who gave them an unsolvable problem/ dilemmas. It's how they ate up the mental energy and kept it going onto them. "Can you recall a problem with _______ which concerned you?" This is how we end up, through lifetimes, bumping into the same people who make trouble for us. A cog ends is that it's a Havingness or a solution to a Not Havingness. This problematic-ness or the relationship to the other person, may be needed to substantiate Self. Or remedy loss of past viewpoints

A lecture on valences said the job was to get rid of the valences, all the while the person was obsessed with accumulating them at a mad, fast rate. Must be worth something.

 

[Cat's Squirrel]

Fair enough Hats, but are you saying that women don't have a problem at all with men looking at them intently and desiring them sexually)? Even though I'm male myself I can imagine that must be an uncomfortable experience, especially if the woman isn't attracted to the man concerned.

 

[Ed8]

There's this thing about receiving abuse. A person's soft theta, the stuff we re-write upon gets to accept the abuser as source. Telepathic sensitivity to what the suppressor would want or not want you to be, do or have.......get felt. It causes angst. Anyone who overwhelmed when young, by a narcissistic parent, now deceased, may feel their jealousies or intentions STILL pervading their personal space.

In my imagination, I've gone into furious psychic wars with druggie co-workers who've were trying to sink my submarine. Next day upon approach, they seemed meek as lambs....downright friendly. How in the world? Did they not know I was ardently tromping them? WHAT is it we go to battle with when it comes the 'shadow work'. From a static point of view, all these conditions and attitudes are carried about accessories....as baubles.....hats....or boots.?

In our present non-Christian age, we don't have the golden rule agreed anymore. It truly seems a general amnesty has gone out for leveling the karmic grief against another. We're no longer unwilling to throw the first stone or wait for just rewards in heaven or hell. I swear the valence packages in those ominous GPMs could, independently, have their throw down in Madison Square Garden.

Every person is connected to every other person, below the level of conscious awareness. This also applies to everything, not just persons, but that datum goes beyond the scope of my reply. Hubbard knew about it, got most of it wrong, and his knowledge seems to go back to his ascension and apparently written in his unpublished book Excalibur. He knew these connections as 'group mind', also known as collective unconscious. I prefer to use the term coined by Rupert Sheldrake: morphic fields. The connections between persons vary in strength, and the relations among people can be altered by anyone with sufficient Aware-Will. You are describing your membership in a 3rd dynamic morphic field (group mind), which has a subset cluster of druggies which you are able to influence. You did a psychic attack on their group mind, which is why the whole cluster of people changed instead of merely one. Affecting many people indicated you went to war with their group's morphic field.

 

[Ed8]

Yes, and drill sargeants in the army (think R. Lee Ermey in "Full Metal Jacket"), bullying teachers etc. It's a very well established technique for dominating people unfortunately.

I once had a difficult neighbour where I live who would drain my energy in a different way; he would bob about from side to side when talking to me and refuse to get to the point in what he was trying to say, and in that way he would pull you into the negative energy vertex that he'd created. I found that I could sometimes (but not always) lock my energy by crossing my hands over in front of my chest and pressing hard, so that he wasn't able to do it.

The most vulnerable point on the front of the body is the solar plexus, so always cover that with your arms, along with the Heart Center. The solar plexus can be used to attack another by projecting a flow from it, so if you know how to reach out and 'cap' a location (I use a shield with a point-up pentagram) with an energy ridge, then do that to block the attack.