Hubbard and the Babalon Working

Caroline

clerk #2
That's a number 6 for Tiphareth (the 6th Sefirot, Beauty).
Indeed I was wondering if the fact it looks like a Zero was intentional, as the Sefirot seems to be related to DAATH ... and didn't noticed it also looked as THETA. Sort of what happened to me when reading "Reality" instead of "Beauty" ...
Sometimes this kind of apparent visual tricks may lead to deeper insights ... I definitely feel Theta is related to Daath/Daleth and Tiphareth.
Thanks M&M. You've solved the mystery about the 6th Sefirot and what looked like a theta symbol to me.

* Tiphareth or Tifereth (beauty): Eloah Va-Daath (God Manifest)
In trying to understand Crowley's Tree of Life diagrams in Liber ABA, it helped me to realize that similar diagrams are used in several systems of mysticism: Jewish, Christian, Hermetic. Variations of thought between systems is sometimes reflected in the respective Tree of Life diagrams.

Additionally, Crowley revised the attributions used by the Golden Dawn (Book 4, Liber ABA, p. 769).
Here's where Crowley put Theta: (The colored arrows and labels are mine.)

I can get the idea that in Christian philosophy for example, that a person "dies" and gets reborn in Christ. The "Eloah Va-Daath (God Manifest)" may reflect such a progression, but I'm not an expert in this.

In Scientology the effort is to become a "living embodiment of LRH technology" with Hubbard as Source. This is part of the religious fraud some Scientologists perpetrate when they promote that Scientology is compatible with Christianity.

Scientologists also promote that we're already in "Hell" and that Scientology is the way out.
This International Scientology News ad illustrates the concept:

International Scientology News Magazine Issue 16 © 2001 CSI
 
Last edited:

Caroline

clerk #2
This has always creeped me out. I've often experienced the sense that my aliveness in the light was preceded by a dark, non- being state, and it was the launching pad for the new light. The dark anathema to all that IS, has been "sedulously ignored". We look Outward, and not into the nothingness.



You said some pretty deep things Caroline. I'm amazed that you can so readily see the similar relationships between things. I'd been carousing Nightside of Eden within google reads a couple days ago. Kenneth Grant is a fascinating writer and deep thinker, and a bit beyond my ken.

Thank you for your encouraging words, Hatshepsut.

In case I didn't make it clear enough in my earlier post, the coloured, indented text is Kenneth Grant's, from Nightside of Eden. I have found his books very helpful in these studies. I keep going back to them, especially Nightside of Eden, The Magical Revival, and Aleister Crowley & The Hidden God. Outside The Circles of Time is a recent find for me, also very interesting and relevant.
 
Last edited:

Hatshepsut

Well-known member
Yes, I knew the coloured paragraph was from Kenneth Grant's Nightside. I had just finished catching up with several of your last posts, and I was still impressed with what you always seemed to come up with in parallel.
 

Caroline

clerk #2
@ Hatshepsut: :hattip: I appreciate what you do too.


Crowley incorporated a lot of Babalon symbolism into his Thoth deck. His Key XI. card features the Harlot Babalon riding a seven-headed, serpent-tailed Beast.

Here is the description from The Crowley Tarot: The Handbook to the Cards:

Foundation
The card
This card reflects a central theme in the life of Aleister Crowley, and at the same time symbolizes a motif from the Apocalypse (Rev. 17.3-4). A beast with the number 666 is mentioned there, corresponding to the Antichrist, upon which the Harlot Babylon rides as the scarlet woman. Crowley identified himself with this animal early in life, and every one of his numerous lovers was given the "honorary title" of scarlet woman. The card shows her to be a woman enraptured in the desires of the senses, riding on the back of a lion-like mixed creature. She symbolizes the sexual ecstasy pouring from every pore of her body. Her desire is more than just the presentation of naked skin, her lust is rapture and divine energy. No one can describe this better than Crowley himself:
"She rides astride the Beast; in her left hand she holds the reins, representing the passion that unites them. In her right she holds aloft the cup, the Holy Grail aflame with love and death." And he further writes:
There is in this card a divine drunkenness or ecstasy. The woman is shown as more than a little drunk, and more than a little mad; and the lion also is aflame with lust. This signifies that the type of energy described is of the primitive, creative order; it is completely independent of the criticism of reason. This card portrays the will of the Aeon. In the background are the bloodless images of the saints, on whom this image travels, for their whole life has been absorbed into the Holy Grail.

Akron, C. F. F., & Banzhaf, H. (1995). The Crowley tarot: The handbook to the cards by Aleister Crowley and Lady Frieda Harris. Stamford, CT: U.S. Games Systems.

The "Beast" in Scientology is of course Hubbard's training lion, seen here in front of ASHO:



And the Golden Age of Tech "New Dawn" lion:


I don't think it's a coincidence that Hubbard and Miscavige's lion and Crowley's lion/beast share a limp wrist. Crowley might have had Androcles' lion in mind, and DM had Crowley in mind.
 

Hatshepsut

Well-known member
More parallels. Amazing!

Am reading the preface to Androcles and the Lion which you provided a link to. That is very interesting.

I always felt that Lion outside of ASHO was atrocious. That's if it remained the same one installed in the 80s.

I am not ambitious, and have never understood this passion for the dawn of a new age or any new world order. Those who are interested in sitting at the top of hierarchies are gifted with a lot of juice. In this case the juice is their WANT for exclusivity on a working spiritual technology.

I don't think Scientology creates a comparable adept to those of the past. Freedom is touted but one is forever tethered to what he owes Lol. Never Do What Thou Wilt or reveling in orgiastic creativity. Hubbard revised that part of his research.
 
Last edited:

Caroline

clerk #2
Better image of the ASHO training lion.

ASHO-training-lion-(tonyortega.org).jpg
Source: https://tonyortega.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/JeffPAC19.jpg

I don't think Scientology creates a comparable adept to those of the past. Freedom is touted but one is forever tethered to what he owes Lol. Never Do What Thou Wilt or reveling in orgiastic creativity. Hubbard revised that part of his research.
Right. In my experience, there was no energy of the "primitive creative order" claimed, described or sought in Scientology. Some of the insiders at the top had a different experience.

Jesse Prince spoke candidly about some of his Sea Org experiences at Int Base at the 2015 Getting Clear Conference in Toronto:

Jesse Prince said:
[00:24:15.427]
JP: That was 1982. So, previous to that I had no contact with Hubbard. I had no concept that they were doing illegal activities. I had no concept whatsoever about what it was really all about.

I mean I was in there to learn how to do magic. I don't know what the hell everyone else was there for. (Laughing.)

(Audience laughter)

... but I was out there, and... and I didn't go there to scream at ashtrays either. I went there to learn to do magic. You know, to do what I wanted to do. You know, subjugate people to my will. This is what LRon said he could teach you to do. Like, "Hell, I want to do that, you know?"

So that's why I'm in there doing it.

[...]

[00:29:19.446]

It was kind of fun and I'll be honest, it was fun for awhile. Because LRon wanted something from me, or expected something from me. Then I was given all the accouterments and wonderful things. Like I had my own tailor, get my clothes made, I'm immediately on a whole different income. I have a credit card that the org pays for. I don't even... You know they did surgery, over $10,000 worth of surgery to correct a deviated septum I had... I had everything. I'm flying all over the world. You know, I'm going to all these different countries, and scaring people, telling them what's going to happen if they screw around with RTC. (Laughs)

https://vimeo.com/ondemand/gettingclear/134503118
 

Hatshepsut

Well-known member
Gonna have to rent that on vimeo for 3 bucks. Lot more there too.


That IS the same lion....but I believe he's had work done on his face. That's Hollywood.:giggle:

Better image of the ASHO training lion.

View attachment 585
Source: https://tonyortega.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/JeffPAC19.jpg



Right. In my experience, there was no energy of the "primitive creative order" claimed, described or sought in Scientology. Some of the insiders at the top had a different experience.

Jesse Prince spoke candidly about some of his Sea Org experiences at Int Base at the 2015 Getting Clear Conference in Toronto:
 
Last edited:

Caroline

clerk #2
Gonna have to rent that on vimeo for 3 bucks. Lot more there too.


That IS the same lion....but I believe he's had work done on his face. That's Hollywood.:giggle:
Yes, a lot more. Jesse talked about and answered questions about the confidential OT 8 material in Sessions 11 and 12.

More to your earlier remark that there is no "Do What Thou Wilt" in Scientology: our job of Scientologists was to perfect our understanding and application of Hubbard's methods. The people at the top of Scientology were the ones doing the Willing for us. Period.

GAT Brochure (1996)_0001.jpg


The "floating" E-meter needle in this promo indicates the supposed state of a thetan at the end of a GAT session.

It seems a bit creepy that auditors must keep adjusting their pcs' needles to Set.
 

Hatshepsut

Well-known member
Wow. I didn't know you could get that kinda display in archive.org. Cool. Must be some rules for what kind've stuff you can upload to that .

I never put a lot of faith in the e-meter. Many times I didn't agree with what was indicated.

The "floating" E-meter needle in this promo indicates the supposed state of a thetan at the end of a GAT session.

It seems a bit creepy that auditors must keep adjusting their pcs' needles to Set.
That's a play on words, 'Set' ?

 

Caroline

clerk #2
Wow. I didn't know you could get that kinda display in archive.org. Cool. Must be some rules for what kind've stuff you can upload to that .

I never put a lot of faith in the e-meter. Many times I didn't agree with what was indicated.

That's a play on words, 'Set' ?

Re: Hubbard's possible play on the word "Set," that thought crossed my mind. Probably not important.

Faith wasn't part of my auditor training or mindset. (Obviously the organization benefits from cloaking the E-Meter in religious terms.) I did have to depend on my auditors' ability to read the meter though, which, like my own ability, wasn't always perfect.

It was helpful to realize that Hubbard and Scientology were not the first to use galvanometers, as I had somehow come to understand. Shortly after I left Scientology I came across Carl Jung's Experimental Researches, in which he reviewed and documented some studies in word association and use of the galvanometer. It seemed to me that some of Hubbard's related material, including about false reads, could have come from that book. Research scientists still sometimes use galvanic skin response devices in their studies, btw.

A bit more history I found interesting: Aleister Crowley's yoga instructor Charles Bennett, aka Ananda Metteyya, apparently did experiments with a galvanometer to measure the power of thought. Web article: About Ananda Metteyya (2003) > Scientology Research

Cf. “Thought is the subject matter of Scientology. It is considered as a kind of “energy” which is not part of the physical universe.” Hubbard, Scientology 8-80. From the Tech Dictionary:

THOUGHT, 1. the perception of the present and the comparison of it to the perceptions and conclusions of the past in order to direct action in the immediate or distant future. (Scn 0-8, p. 78) 2. the manifestation of evolving a low-level certainty of observation from a number of past observations. (PAB 8) 3. a static of unlimited capabilities, which has itself no wave-length, no space, and no time. It is impinged upon a physical universe which has space, time, energy and matter. The mission of thought is survival in the physical universe and in order to do this it is effecting a conquest of the physical universe. (5203 CM03B) 4. thought is the phenomenon of combining, imagining or postulating theta facsimiles for the estimation of future physical efforts. (AP&A, p. 22) 5. thought is not motion in space and time. Thought is a static containing an image of motion. (HFP, p. 25) 6. the subject matter of Scn. It is considered as a kind of “energy” which is not part of the physical universe. It controls energy, but has no wave-length. It uses matter but it has no mass. It is found in space, but it has no position. It records time but it is not subject to time. In Scn the Greek word (and letter), theta, is used as a symbol for thought. (Abil 114A) 7. the causal agent in an organism. It is thought which causes everything both structural and functional that happens in an organism. An organism without thought is already dead. (Abil 114A )
Hubbard, L. R. (1975). Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary, Los Angeles: Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization.
 
Last edited:

Enthetan

Veteran of the Psychic Wars
I appreciate that, Hatshepshut.



There's also an essay about Universe B here: Occult view of Universe B how dangerous is it?

Your post reminded me of a related concept in the NOTs materials, which Hubbard explained in terms of BT phenomena:







Also mentioned in the NOTs materials are terms such as "negative space," "negative mass," etc.
This jogged my memory. The whole BT thing which Hubbard talked about in 1967, reminded me of an Outer Limits episode written by Harlan Ellison (who knew Hubbard) in 1964


In the episode, the entire human race had been encoded and implanted into a humanoid robot, much like the idea of BTs

Harlan also talked about being present when Hubbard got the idea to start the Church

 

Caroline

clerk #2
This jogged my memory. The whole BT thing which Hubbard talked about in 1967, reminded me of an Outer Limits episode written by Harlan Ellison (who knew Hubbard) in 1964


In the episode, the entire human race had been encoded and implanted into a humanoid robot, much like the idea of BTs

Harlan also talked about being present when Hubbard got the idea to start the Church

Some may find this hard to believe, but it was not uncommon for NOTs pre-OTs to clear out entire civilizations of BTs in just one session. <I think this may be one of those CAMO moments.>

Nevertheless, I appreciated the Youtube video, with that mention of L. Sprague De Camp. De Camp corresponded with Robert Heinlein about Hubbard, Jack Parsons, Dianetics, and other relevant topics. His letters provide an interesting context to the subject of Dianetics between the mid 40s and into the 50s.
 

Hatshepsut

Well-known member
Re: Hubbard's possible play on the word "Set," that thought crossed my mind. Probably not important.

Faith wasn't part of my auditor training or mindset. (Obviously the organization benefits from cloaking the E-Meter in religious terms.) I did have to depend on my auditors' ability to read the meter though, which, like my own ability, wasn't always perfect.

It was helpful to realize that Hubbard and Scientology were not the first to use galvanometers, as I had somehow come to understand. Shortly after I left Scientology I came across Carl Jung's Experimental Researches, in which he reviewed and documented some studies in word association and use of the galvanometer. It seemed to me that some of Hubbard's related material, including about false reads, could have come from that book. Research scientists still sometimes use galvanic skin response devices in their studies, btw.

A bit more history I found interesting: Aleister Crowley's yoga instructor Charles Bennett, aka Ananda Metteyya, apparently did experiments with a galvanometer to measure the power of thought. Web article: About Ananda Metteyya (2003) > Scientology Research

Cf. “Thought is the subject matter of Scientology. It is considered as a kind of “energy” which is not part of the physical universe.” Hubbard, Scientology 8-80. From the Tech Dictionary:

THOUGHT, 1. the perception of the present and the comparison of it to the perceptions and conclusions of the past in order to direct action in the immediate or distant future. (Scn 0-8, p. 78) 2. the manifestation of evolving a low-level certainty of observation from a number of past observations. (PAB 8) 3. a static of unlimited capabilities, which has itself no wave-length, no space, and no time. It is impinged upon a physical universe which has space, time, energy and matter. The mission of thought is survival in the physical universe and in order to do this it is effecting a conquest of the physical universe. (5203 CM03B) 4. thought is the phenomenon of combining, imagining or postulating theta facsimiles for the estimation of future physical efforts. (AP&A, p. 22) 5. thought is not motion in space and time. Thought is a static containing an image of motion. (HFP, p. 25) 6. the subject matter of Scn. It is considered as a kind of “energy” which is not part of the physical universe. It controls energy, but has no wave-length. It uses matter but it has no mass. It is found in space, but it has no position. It records time but it is not subject to time. In Scn the Greek word (and letter), theta, is used as a symbol for thought. (Abil 114A) 7. the causal agent in an organism. It is thought which causes everything both structural and functional that happens in an organism. An organism without thought is already dead. (Abil 114A )
Hubbard, L. R. (1975). Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary, Los Angeles: Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization.
A bit of woo about 'sparks'.

Charles Bennett was well thought of in his day, and one of the few people Crowley considered a good friend. Eastern practices became chic in his day.
Allan 4.jpgBennett-1.jpg Crowley.....aleister-crowley-56e53788-b980-47fb-bb0e-70444f5a6bb-resize-750.jpeg
Left, in Buddhist garb. He has that wild look of the poets of the Romantic period. What was with that HAIR all over the world.
Charles Henry Allan Bennett (1872 -1923), British Magician, Buddhist, A Member…

Some interesting tidbits about the death rate of some aspirants in the Golden Dawn.


Excerpt below in red from the above definitions of Thought in the Technical Dictionary. Bolded is mine. It makes the subject of BTs more like a located consideration, only erroneously thinking it is located in time. Interesting that running mental images on NED included getting the consideration or postulate, instead of just trying to 'erase' energy. A person is doing expanding and contraction---into and out of physical energy, until he is separated from it. Kabbalistic and Eastern practices, like those of rising up the planes, put personal conscious thru the paces. It's all what you are doing with the attention. So it is with yoga I suppose.

(AP&A, p. 22) 5. thought is not motion in space and time. Thought is a static containing an image of motion. (HFP, p. 25) 6. the subject matter of Scn. It is considered as a kind of “energy” which is not part of the physical universe. It controls energy, but has no wave-length. It uses matter but it has no mass. It is found in space, but it has no position. It records time but it is not subject to time. In Scn the Greek word (and letter), theta, is used as a symbol for thought. (Abil 114A) 7. the causal agent in an organism. It is thought which causes everything both structural and functional that happens in an organism. An organism without thought is already dead. (Abil 114A )


I could see where Carl Jung would want to search the subconscious for associations and their meaning. He had some acute observations about our spiritual operating software. He was scouting for the predispositions to have certain outlooks within human consciousness.


LIke with Crowley, a body of Jung's work also ended up published in a 'red book'.


In November of 1913 Carl Jung commenced an extraordinary exploration of the psyche, or "soul." He called it his “confrontation with the unconscious.” During this period Jung willfully entered imaginative or "visionary" states of consciousness. The visions continued intensely from the end of 1913 until about 1917 and then abated by around 1923. Jung carefully recorded this imaginative journey in six black-covered personal journals (referred to as the "Black Books"); these notebooks provide a dated chronological ledger of his visions and dialogues with his Soul.
1571895581999.png
 
Last edited:

Hatshepsut

Well-known member


Crowley's Tree of Life with Book of Changes correspondences.

The 'Four Conditions of Existence' (Tetragrammaton): As-Isness, Alter-Isness, Is-ness and Not-Isness, some scales, etc. can be found on the "Tree."
1571894324358.png:unsure::unsure::unsure::flowers:
 

Caroline

clerk #2
Excerpt below in red from the above definitions of Thought in the Technical Dictionary. Bolded is mine. It makes the subject of BTs more like a located consideration, only erroneously thinking it is located in time. Interesting that running mental images on NED included getting the consideration or postulate, instead of just trying to 'erase' energy. A person is doing expanding and contraction---into and out of physical energy, until he is separated from it. Kabbalistic and Eastern practices, like those of rising up the planes, put personal conscious thru the paces. It's all what you are doing with the attention. So it is with yoga I suppose.

(AP&A, p. 22) 5. thought is not motion in space and time. Thought is a static containing an image of motion. (HFP, p. 25) 6. the subject matter of Scn. It is considered as a kind of “energy” which is not part of the physical universe. It controls energy, but has no wave-length. It uses matter but it has no mass. It is found in space, but it has no position. It records time but it is not subject to time. In Scn the Greek word (and letter), theta, is used as a symbol for thought. (Abil 114A) 7. the causal agent in an organism. It is thought which causes everything both structural and functional that happens in an organism. An organism without thought is already dead. (Abil 114A )
Great post, Hatshepsut. Lots to unpack.

According to Hubbard, body thetans and clusters (of body thetans) get hung up because of their various misconceptions about time, space, and identity. This NOTs indoc material might help to clarify Hubbard's basic theories, which of course apply to all thetans, embodied or not:

Misconceptions of identity, time, place, form and event hang a thetan up. The only reason why a cluster hangs together is such misconception.
A thetan can have a misconception of time, by having a wrong date for an incident. Or he can conceive that a past picture is “now”. Or he can have two incidents switched in time, and think the earlier incident is later, and think the later incident is earlier. Such a misconception of time hangs it up and prevents a blow. And you can get a blow by straightening out the time misconception.
A misconception of place occurs when a thetan thinks something happened in location A, when it happened in location B. You can get a misconception of both time and place. E.g. a cluster gets a recent heavy restimulation. They think the incident was the restim, they made a picture of the restim and think that’s where it occurred originally - think the cluster was formed at the time and place of the restimulation. So they have both the time and place in error. This misconception of both time and place confuses them and hangs the cluster up.
Misconception of identity. Thetan X thinks he was implanted in “Woof” (place) - but actually he’s copying the picture of somebody who was implanted in “Woof”. He hangs up on the misconception of identity (thinks he’s the other thetan), and misconception of event (thinks he was implanted when he wasn’t).
The whole reason why a cluster stays one, is misconception of identity, time, place, form and event - which is why Date/Locate works. The cluster is hanging in a time and space disorientation.
That’s what louses a BT up, some sort of misconception of time, space, form and event or beingness. That ties them up and they are hard to untangle and blow.
They can switch all over the place with identity: he thinks he’s thetan “A”, but he’s really thetan “B” mocking up “A”, and that will cause a stress - that’s probably the anatomy of stress.
HCOB 22 September 1978 NED for OTs Series 5 Misconceptions

Hubbard's Theta-MEST theory is also relevant:
Definition: MEST

THETA-MEST THEORY, 1. a theory generated by myself in the fall of 1950 as an effort to explain (just a theory) the phenomena of an analyzer working in one direction and a reactive mind working in quite another, the reactive mind being interesting, and the analyzer being interested. (5410CM06) 2 . the idea is that life is a no-substance thing, up against a physical universe which is a substance thing. Here is nothingness up against a somethingness interacting where the nothingness or the no-substance thing is actually giving orders to and handling the all substance thing, the physical universe. (UPC 3 5406CM——) 3 . the idea that there was a universe and that there was thought—theta without wave-length, without mass, without time, without position in space: this was life. And that was impinged upon something else called the physical universe, which was a mechanical entity which did things in a peculiar way, and these two things together, theta-mest interacting, gave us life forms. (PXL, p. 140)

Hubbard, L. R., (1975) Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary. Los Angeles: Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization.

More about Hubbard's theory from Science of Survival (1951):

The Basic Principles of Processing
In practice, in Dianetics, the auditor is doing a very simple thing. He is recovering theta which has become confused with MEST by reason of physical pain and emotional shock. He is by dianetic processing converting entheta to theta. A fundamental axiom of Dianetics is that life is formed by theta compounding with MEST to make a living organism. Life is theta plus MEST.
Another axiom is that theta conquers MEST by first becoming enturbulated with it and then withdrawing, possessed of some of the laws of MEST, and returning over the MEST for an orderly conquest.
Another axiom is that theta, in its conquest of MEST, has followed the cycle of contact, growth, decay, and death, repeated over and over, theta each time using the data gained during the cycle to better adapt the organism for the further conquest of MEST.
Theta is thought, an energy of its own universe analogous to energy in the physical universe but only occasionally paralleling electro-magnetic-gravitic laws.
The three primary components of theta are affinity, reality and communication.
Theta has the strange power of animating and directing MEST and bringing it into an orderly, mobile, and self-perpetuating unit known to us as a life organism.
Dianetics is that branch of Scientology that covers mental anatomy.
Theta and MEST in a disorderly collision bring about enturbulation in both the theta and the MEST which actually changes or reverses the polarity of the theta and the MEST. This reversed polarity permits the rejection of theta by enMEST and of MEST by entheta, so that
death can ensue and a new organism can be begun.
Theta acting upon MEST with affinity, communication, and reality takes on an aspect known as reasoning or understanding. All mathematics can be derived from ARC acting upon MEST.
Hubbard, L. R. (1951). Science of Survival.

Incidentally, a bit more on "Universe B": In addition to the lower half of Hubbard's tone scale, (Body Death at 0.0 down to Total Failure at -40.0), the lower ethics conditions ("Non-Existence," "Liability," "Doubt," "Enemy," "Treason," and "Confusion") correspond as well.
 

No One

a girl is no one
I haven't finished watching the above video yet, but I had to stop and make a comment. I like the great overview the guy gives and I also love his sense of humor. At about 43:30 he says, "Ron, you know, goes on to found the Church of Scientology and by the late 60's he's got a frikkin navy for Christ sake!" LOL
..............................................................................................

At the end of the video there is a nice recap of some of the pictures used in the presentation and some other pictures. I enjoyed watching that video.

To add: The guy trashes Hubbard but acknowledges him for being able to continue what he was doing even with an extraordinary amount of incoming flak. He also seems to say that just maybe Hubbard might have tuned into "a little bit of something" if I heard it correctly.
This is fascinating.
 

Hatshepsut

Well-known member
Great post, Hatshepsut. Lots to unpack.

According to Hubbard, body thetans and clusters (of body thetans) get hung up because of their various misconceptions about time, space, and identity. This NOTs indoc material might help to clarify Hubbard's basic theories, which of course apply to all thetans, embodied or not:

Misconceptions of identity, time, place, form and event hang a thetan up. The only reason why a cluster hangs together is such misconception.
A thetan can have a misconception of time, by having a wrong date for an incident. Or he can conceive that a past picture is “now”. Or he can have two incidents switched in time, and think the earlier incident is later, and think the later incident is earlier. Such a misconception of time hangs it up and prevents a blow. And you can get a blow by straightening out the time misconception.
A misconception of place occurs when a thetan thinks something happened in location A, when it happened in location B. You can get a misconception of both time and place. E.g. a cluster gets a recent heavy restimulation. They think the incident was the restim, they made a picture of the restim and think that’s where it occurred originally - think the cluster was formed at the time and place of the restimulation. So they have both the time and place in error. This misconception of both time and place confuses them and hangs the cluster up.
Misconception of identity. Thetan X thinks he was implanted in “Woof” (place) - but actually he’s copying the picture of somebody who was implanted in “Woof”. He hangs up on the misconception of identity (thinks he’s the other thetan), and misconception of event (thinks he was implanted when he wasn’t).
The whole reason why a cluster stays one, is misconception of identity, time, place, form and event - which is why Date/Locate works. The cluster is hanging in a time and space disorientation.
That’s what louses a BT up, some sort of misconception of time, space, form and event or beingness. That ties them up and they are hard to untangle and blow.
They can switch all over the place with identity: he thinks he’s thetan “A”, but he’s really thetan “B” mocking up “A”, and that will cause a stress - that’s probably the anatomy of stress.
HCOB 22 September 1978 NED for OTs Series 5 Misconceptions

Hubbard's Theta-MEST theory is also relevant:
Definition: MEST

THETA-MEST THEORY, 1. a theory generated by myself in the fall of 1950 as an effort to explain (just a theory) the phenomena of an analyzer working in one direction and a reactive mind working in quite another, the reactive mind being interesting, and the analyzer being interested. (5410CM06) 2 . the idea is that life is a no-substance thing, up against a physical universe which is a substance thing. Here is nothingness up against a somethingness interacting where the nothingness or the no-substance thing is actually giving orders to and handling the all substance thing, the physical universe. (UPC 3 5406CM——) 3 . the idea that there was a universe and that there was thought—theta without wave-length, without mass, without time, without position in space: this was life. And that was impinged upon something else called the physical universe, which was a mechanical entity which did things in a peculiar way, and these two things together, theta-mest interacting, gave us life forms. (PXL, p. 140)

Hubbard, L. R., (1975) Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary. Los Angeles: Church of Scientology of California Publications Organization.

More about Hubbard's theory from Science of Survival (1951):

The Basic Principles of Processing
In practice, in Dianetics, the auditor is doing a very simple thing. He is recovering theta which has become confused with MEST by reason of physical pain and emotional shock. He is by dianetic processing converting entheta to theta. A fundamental axiom of Dianetics is that life is formed by theta compounding with MEST to make a living organism. Life is theta plus MEST.
Another axiom is that theta conquers MEST by first becoming enturbulated with it and then withdrawing, possessed of some of the laws of MEST, and returning over the MEST for an orderly conquest.
Another axiom is that theta, in its conquest of MEST, has followed the cycle of contact, growth, decay, and death, repeated over and over, theta each time using the data gained during the cycle to better adapt the organism for the further conquest of MEST.
Theta is thought, an energy of its own universe analogous to energy in the physical universe but only occasionally paralleling electro-magnetic-gravitic laws.
The three primary components of theta are affinity, reality and communication.
Theta has the strange power of animating and directing MEST and bringing it into an orderly, mobile, and self-perpetuating unit known to us as a life organism.
Dianetics is that branch of Scientology that covers mental anatomy.
Theta and MEST in a disorderly collision bring about enturbulation in both the theta and the MEST which actually changes or reverses the polarity of the theta and the MEST. This reversed polarity permits the rejection of theta by enMEST and of MEST by entheta, so that
death can ensue and a new organism can be begun.
Theta acting upon MEST with affinity, communication, and reality takes on an aspect known as reasoning or understanding. All mathematics can be derived from ARC acting upon MEST.
Hubbard, L. R. (1951). Science of Survival.

Incidentally, a bit more on "Universe B": In addition to the lower half of Hubbard's tone scale, (Body Death at 0.0 down to Total Failure at -40.0), the lower ethics conditions ("Non-Existence," "Liability," "Doubt," "Enemy," "Treason," and "Confusion") correspond as well.
OK then, I guess Crowley put polarity into the 'tree'. It looks highly electronic in the graphic above. Almost like something you'd see on the console of an alien spaceship. The question is, IS there polarity in the sephiroh where there seems an evolutionary unfolding from one modality of God into the next? They certainly take center stage in the Kybalion.



Excerpt from Caroline's post, SOS and The Basic Principles of Processing.
Theta and MEST in a disorderly collision bring about enturbulation in both the theta and the MEST which actually changes or reverses the polarity of the theta and the MEST. This reversed polarity permits the rejection of theta by enMEST and of MEST by entheta, so that
death can ensue and a new organism can be begun.


Sounds like the tape with Mary Sue auditing Ron on Theta vs Mest goals......electropsychometric auditing, Scouting the war between the universes.

Tape begins after ads on this Underground Bunker site.
 
Last edited:
Top