The state's entire 42,000-word response to Danny Masterson's criminal appeal

Karen#1

Well-known member
TONY ORTEGA
Excerpt:

Late last year we got our first look at Danny Masterson’s attempt to reverse the criminal conviction that has the Scientology celebrity serving 30 years to life in a California state prison.

His opening appeal brief was submitted by Cliff Gardner, one of the most high-profile appellate attorneys in the country. Gardner’s brief took aim at what it characterized as the changing stories in the testimony of the Jane Doe victims, but it also blasted Judge Charlaine Olmedo for allowing in so much evidence about the Church of Scientology.

Since then we’ve been looking forward to a response from the state, and this week it arrived, all 41,916 words of it.

Reading it, we are once again stunned by how much Scientology and its victim-blaming policies were a part of both trials, and what these victims had to endure to bring this case to justice.

Of course, it’s primarily about horrific sexual crimes described in detail, so please be forewarned before you decide to read on, since once again we’ve decided to bring you the entire document.

And please note, your email provider will not deliver this entire post. Please come to tonyortega.substack.com to see it in its entirety.

READ MORE

 
TONY ORTEGA
Excerpt:

Late last year we got our first look at Danny Masterson’s attempt to reverse the criminal conviction that has the Scientology celebrity serving 30 years to life in a California state prison.






His opening appeal brief was submitted by Cliff Gardner, one of the most high-profile appellate attorneys in the country. Gardner’s brief took aim at what it characterized as the changing stories in the testimony of the Jane Doe victims, but it also blasted Judge Charlaine Olmedo for allowing in so much evidence about the Church of Scientology.

Since then we’ve been looking forward to a response from the state, and this week it arrived, all 41,916 words of it.

Reading it, we are once again stunned by how much Scientology and its victim-blaming policies were a part of both trials, and what these victims had to endure to bring this case to justice.

Of course, it’s primarily about horrific sexual crimes described in detail, so please be forewarned before you decide to read on, since once again we’ve decided to bring you the entire document.

And please note, your email provider will not deliver this entire post. Please come to tonyortega.substack.com to see it in its entirety.

READ MORE




There is too much evil in Scientology's core practices to adequately describe
in a single post. I'll just cut-n-paste one small bit as a reminder of how
diabolically destructive and insane the cult of Scientology is:


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
". . . Swartz made it clear from the beginning that [Jane Doe 1] could not use the word “rape.” If she were to include anything that the church considered false, she could be expelled.
Her Knowledge Report was completed in June 2003. She gave a copy to the Celebrity Centre in December 2003 when she was summoned to Miranda Scoggins for “a punishment action,” which was like a court martial. She was punished for reporting appellant’s rape. She spent the next few months in an extensive “ethics program” where she had to report to Swartz daily for intense and invasive interrogations, searching for anything she had done in her life that was bad for Scientology. They were intended to determine whether [Jane Doe 1] “had any evil purposes to . . .(and) If [she] had raped anyone [her]self in a previous lifetime... This was in accordance with church “policy that one accuses others of things they themselves have done.” She struggled because it was really hard for her to find a way to say that she must have raped someone.
[Jane Doe 1] received “a non-enturbulation order,” a yellow paper distributed to everyone in her group prohibiting her from speaking. It said a third-party investigation, like a court martial, had been conducted and [Jane Doe 1] was determined to be “the source.” If one more report was received of her saying anything upsetting to anyone in the group, she would be expelled.
To be expelled from Scientology meant she would “lose everything.” Her faith was “not a light thing,” it was an “eternity, many lifetimes.” Her parents would not be able to have a relationship with her or her daughter, otherwise they would be expelled, and many of their employees were Scientologists. She would have nowhere to live, no job, and no friends. . ."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


SUMMARY: The cult of scientology and its gurus are psychotic criminals
who will happily and efficiently destroy anyone who gets in their way.




..
 
Last edited:
..
It’s extremely f-ed up how deeply the Scientology Organization was ( I guess still is ) involved with this for years….

And still is.,..


REASON THEY'RE STILL INVOLVED:
Because Scientology is an apex parasite. When they are sucking the life and money out of their host(s), they have ZERO INCENTIVE to release their bite. To free their captive source of food from their ravenous jaws would be a self-imposed death sentence. There is a very good reason why approximately 97.5% of all Scientologists escape ("blow") from the parasitically sucking & munching cult and DO NOT RETURN.

Because nobody likes to be someone else's dinner.


..
 
SUMMARY: The cult of scientology and its gurus are psychotic criminals
who will happily and efficiently destroy anyone who gets in their way.

..


I've heard Scientology described as a "Mafia-like organization", but from the perspective of a Scientologist, getting expelled is much worse than anything the Mafia could do to their worst enemies.

Scientology doesn't just threaten your life, they threaten to ruin your eternity. And they threatened to do that to women who wanted to make a criminal complaint on someone who raped them. And they held the victims responsible for getting raped, putting them through an "ethics program"

I believe that when the general public sees Scientology AS-IS, the Co$ will quickly vanish.
 
..

I've heard Scientology described as a "Mafia-like organization", but from the perspective of a Scientologist, getting expelled is much worse than anything the Mafia could do to their worst enemies.Scientology doesn't just threaten your life, they threaten to ruin your eternity. And they threatened to do that to women who wanted to make a criminal complaint on someone who raped them. And they held the victims responsible for getting raped, putting them through an "ethics program". I believe that when the general public sees Scientology AS-IS, the Co$ will quickly vanish.


The sheer evil core that guides Scientology is just so awful that it paradoxically PROTECTS the cult. Because ordinary people have enough challenges, problems and stress in their lives and it's simply too uncomfortable to read about a nightmarish cult that attacks rape victims and tries to ruin the rest of their already-shattered life so that they don't reveal that an "OT" raped them.

But slowly, the anti-scientology virus is spreading and there is nothing the cult can do to stop their own venomous hate and wicked reputation from closing their "churches" and ruining themselves.

Hubbard thought "FAIR GAME" would stop the enemies of Scientology. If fact it fueled the viral growth of Scientology enemies beyond mere blown members; it has spread wide and far to people that were NEVER EVEN IN Scientology in the first place.

That's pretty bad, when prospective customers who never tried your product already fear and hate you. LOL


..
 
Back
Top