SCIENTOLOGY BLACK OPS: Episode 3 leaks online, with bizarre kidnap attempt in broad daylight

[ILove2Lurk]

Click on 360, as below, then press play.

Make sure volume is high.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Riddick]

The Oracle.
Question.
Did the first 2 leaks of Black Ops play for you ?
OR
Have you not been able to play any of them ?

The other is problem unknown is if Oracle is on what operating system, if older then windows 10, that's a problem. Anyways. Plus internet speed connection if broadband.

Great post in the beginning and video released. It's agent provocateur and agent saboteur.

Unknown to many is the conversation between Hubbard and Heinlein, before Dianetics was published but Hubbard tried to get Heinlein involved.

Anyways, I tried. Will attempt again to explain.

 

[The Oracle]

The Oracle.
Question.
Did the first 2 leaks of Black Ops play for you ?
OR
Have you not been able to play any of them ?

I have not been able to play my of them.

 

[ILove2Lurk]

Four things:

Reboot your computer​

​

Clear your Internet browser cache (you can google: "how to clear cache in Firefox" or whatever browser you use)​

​

Go to neighbor's house -- or your library or a coffee shop -- with faster Internet and use a laptop​

​

If you are in certain countries, it may be blocked for some reason -- unknown​

That's it! No more. All I can say. Told you all I know.

 

[ILove2Lurk]

Enough about computers . . . now back to business:
BLACK OPS FRIDAY
All new exes, lurkers, under-the-radar "in" folks and visitors, just immediately
go here and watch this extraordinary video series. You'll be blown away.

SCIENTOLOGY BLACK OPS: Episode 3 leaks online, with bizarre kidnap attempt in broad daylight

This is the stuff Miscavige and Scientology does not want you to see.
Ever.​

 

[Karen#1]

Ever wondered why the cult brings in SEX into its PR Hits on critics ?
Recent example of the attacks on Paul Haggis...
Because Hubbard said to.

Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press. Don’t ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way."

- L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 25 February 1966

 

[Karakorum]

Holy sh*t! Now I REALLY see why the COS did not want these
episodes aired -- or worse yet, leaked. Just keep getting better and
better . . . or worse and worse, depending on which side you're on.

I'll ask our resident psyops expert, @Karakorum, if he thinks the
scenario in the episode is even possible in this day and age.

This is scary sh*t -- shades of the unbounded 70's GO operations.

Self-declared expert reporting for duty.

Observation 1: As I said before, it sounds entirely credible that they would gather all sorts of information about Paul Haggis, including getting interviews/interrogations of people who worked with him, lived with him and so on.

Observation 2: The timestamp 8:39 contains the following statement: "One of the most effective tools at their disposal is their own files on current and former members containing written transcripts of their most personal confessions along with audio and video recordings, including those made by their biggest celebrities."

This part tells me the producers talked with someone who really seems to know their stuff. Probably an ex-SO member who worked with the ethics db or maybe even someone from inv itself.

Why do I think that? Because it very clearly delineates all 3 forms of they way confessionals are stored in the db: Video, audio and transcripts. People who have only a casual second-hand knowledge tend to speak in general terms like "they have the ethics files/confessionals".
Thinking and speaking more precisely in terms of "transcripts" - that is exactly the wording which would be used by someone who herself/himself worked with the data. Heck, you can even search my own forum posts for the term "transcripts" and you will see I myself referred to that many times.

I have some suspicions who exactly might be the source that they got this from, but if I'm correct than that person will never appear on camera.


So, @ILove2Lurk , does this answer your questions?