Deep Dive Aaron's Attacker . . . Massive Breakthrough?

he seems to have a lot of family out my way.

 
Actually, if you can, find a still of dog guy walking from the front, still at mid-stride right leg.
Here's the best we have. Three short videos on this page:

 
~
The "psycho" attacker has publicly revealed to the world:
  • he's a combat veteran​
  • suffers from PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder -- anxiety disorder from traumatic events)​
  • retired US Army; 2nd Armored Division ("Hell on Wheels")​
  • at age 52, he has a 40+ year history of drug and alcohol abuse​
  • has been sober and "clean" for about one year; celebrates it; "no drink no weed no nothing"​
  • member of NA/AA​
  • is single​
  • his dog has a visible tags: "service dog" . . . "do not pet". . . "yes I do bite"​
  • believes in god and celebrates god​
  • covered with large body tattoos front and back​
 
Last edited:
somebody said his dog papers were pretty bogus. but despite all the yapping on videos that it isn't his dog, clearly it is. his daughter does have a service dog. entirely different breed.
 
~
Help me with this. Do we have any kind of match or just a vague similarity? String to pull?

I actually hunted up a larger copy of the image in the Czech Republic (1200 x 1200 image). Best I could find.


The man in the photo (Way to Happiness shirt and hat) seems to have a right foot limp. Something is askew with his step.

A distinctive bend or curvature of the right leg. Not stepping straight.

So does our attacker. Watch his gait in the Aaron videos.

Source: LAPD and the Church of Scientology Awarded by the Faith and Blue Initiative - Send2Press Newswire
Yeah, I can't say I'm sure about the face. But the gait is pretty convincing.

What y'all think? Need your fresh eyes on this. :giveup:
The ears look different. Could really use a photo of the guy in white but without the cap to be sure.
 
OK, we're working on this here.

A basic belief is that the still picture represents someone with a right leg issue with bracing.

We're doing some other looking so I might come back with something.

So bottom line, the dog guy obviously has a right issue. The still photograph represents a person that has a right leg issue, possibly braced at that time.

Hopefully more to come.
 
In this clip, there appears to be bracing on the right knee, possibly both. Knee and or knee and ankle involvement. The TWTH Pic indicates at least a right leg brace and/or issue with right knee, ankle and possibly the hip.

We will continue to search. The thought here is wow, the Pic from the cult shows the gentleman has an issue with the same leg. Odds???

 
  • his dog has a visible tags: "service dog" . . . "do not pet". . . "yes I do bite"

If he IS a service dog it seems that biting people is a part of how he serves.

It might be legal for a dog in California to bite as long as he doesn't bite a POC.

But If you know you're dog bites and repeatedly let him near other people so he can bite them I would think that you're opening yourself up to a civil lawsuit.

A quick search brought this up as well:


Further, Penal Code 399 PC is the California statute that makes it a crime for dog owners to fail to control a dangerous dog. The offense can be a filed as a misdemeanor or a felony, and carries a penalty of up to 3 years in county jail.

As to dog bites, California law imposes “strict liability” on owners if their pet bites a person. This means the owner of a dog who bites someone is liable in a civil lawsuit for the victim’s injuries – even if the animal has never bitten before and the owner did nothing wrong.



Several breeds may be classified as pit bull dogs, including the American pit bull terrier, the Staffordshire bull terrier, and any mixed breeds that resemble these stocky and muscular dogs and are considered pit bull types. While the state of California doesn't have any specific laws targeting these breeds, there are laws that target potentially dangerous and vicious dogs.


No matter what the breed, if a dog has previously attempted to attack, has bitten someone off an owner's property, or has attacked an animal off the owner's property, she is considered potentially dangerous.

Vicious dogs are defined as those who have been listed as potentially dangerous and are still aggressive, have severely injured or killed someone, or have been seized for use in dog fighting. These labels are determined by law enforcement, animal control, and the California court system.




CALL US 24/7 - (866) 383-8922
California Pit Bull Attacks
 
Doubt it is a Service Dog.... They are very expensive....and much training is involved.

What could be looked at is Hand Signals.... Dogs respond very well to hand signals....especially in noisy environments.... Actually they respond to hand signals better than verbal commands....

Was this guy giving hand signals? With a cane or baton in one hand and the dog leash in the other....I doubt it.
 
diehard-jpg.24018


:coolwink:
 
  • he's a combat veteran​
  • suffers from PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder -- anxiety disorder from traumatic events)​
  • retired US Army; 2nd Armored Division ("Hell on Wheels")​
  • at age 52, he has a 40+ year history of drug and alcohol abuse​

i'd question just how accurate a representation that is...remember a guy called Hubbard and his war record claims?

from what i knew of vets, someone with that sort of temperament (or much of a problem with alcohol abuse, or almost any drug use) would not have reached a normal 20+ year retirement, unless something that caused it happened to him after he had been in that long. however he certainly could have some sort of disability pension and VA benefits after fewer years, if injured or disabled.

and i found that the 2nd Armored Division hasn't existed since 1995, when he would have been about 23; it participated in the Gulf War in 1991, when he would have been about 19. so if he did get PTSD while in the Army, it could have been after as little as about a year of service.
 
Assault of Aaron Smith-Levin


i'd question just how accurate a representation that is...remember a guy called Hubbard and his war record claims?

from what i knew of vets, someone with that sort of temperament (or much of a problem with alcohol abuse, or almost any drug use) would not have reached a normal 20+ year retirement, unless something that caused it happened to him after he had been in that long. however he certainly could have some sort of disability pension and VA benefits after fewer years, if injured or disabled.

and i found that the 2nd Armored Division hasn't existed since 1995, when he would have been about 23; it participated in the Gulf War in 1991, when he would have been about 19. so if he did get PTSD while in the Army, it could have been after as little as about a year of service.
 
~
The "psycho" attacker has publicly revealed to the world:
  • he's a combat veteran​
  • suffers from PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder -- anxiety disorder from traumatic events)​
  • retired US Army; 2nd Armored Division ("Hell on Wheels")​
  • at age 52, he has a 40+ year history of drug and alcohol abuse​
  • has been sober and "clean" for about one year; celebrates it; "no drink no weed no nothing"​
  • member of NA/AA​
  • is single​
  • his dog has a visible tags: "service dog" . . . "do not pet". . . "yes I do bite"​
  • believes in god and celebrates god​
  • covered with large body tattoos front and back​



Excellent biographical sketch.

Further research indicates that he recently completed the Ethics Course and has already very successfully applied the first two (2) steps of the Non-Existence Formula with Aaron (1. Find a com line. 2. Make yourself known):

“I’m a combat veteran with PTSD, fucker!
I will fuckin’ kill you!”

Screen_Shot_2024-01-22_at_8.04.10_PM.png

Asked if he works for the Church of Scientology, he replied:
"I don't get paid to beat SP motherfuckers up, I'm a volunteer minister!"
LOL

...

 
Last edited:
:hysterical: You're clever. I looked it up too and did the math. Many questions. :whistle:

thanks. i have this tendency to look at things and question, and want to dig into the truth behind them, that among other things may have gotten in the way of my having the opportunity of being in a cult....

i'll add, it's possible he served in the Army longer and just wears the patch for his original combat unit. but i suspect it's more likely that he only served a year or a couple of years before his service ended, which may have been because of a formal PTSD diagnosis or something else. it's conceivable that he put in 20 or more good years and retired after service in combat zones in the 2010s left him with PTSD that gave him the temperament he has now, and doesn't wear the patch for whatever unit he was in then, but that seems about the least likely scenario to me.
 
Virginia Perry Perry and Virginia Perry interacts with 3 Patrick Perry




Could that Virginia Perry and Perry Perry be = to the Scientologist OT Virginia Perry?
 
Back
Top