Cathy's cruel 'arbitration': Can this denunciation finally upend Scientology's star chamber?

[Karen#1]

TONY ORTEGA
Excerpt:

[td width="1080px"]

​

[/td][td]

​

[/td]​

[Cathy Fraser, Scientology arbitrator]
For years we’ve been telling you about Scientology’s cynical strategy for derailing the lawsuits filed by former members: Force them into the church’s own brand of internal “religious arbitration.”
In several cases, we’ve documented how Scientology convinces courts that its former members are obliged to take their cases these proceedings, which in no way resemble actual legal proceedings.
Repeatedly, judges have fended off complaints that Scientology arbitration is completely one-sided and unfair, and designed to frustrate former members and their pursuit of justice.
Now, a huge amount of new information has come out about the latest example of this, as Australian residents Valeska Paris and Gawain and Laura Baxter walked out after 15 days of unfair arbitration run by Sea Org official Cathy Fraser in Clearwater, and now seek relief from a Tampa federal court.
And they have something new that really seems impressive. For an opinion about what they’ve been put through, they sought the expertise of perhaps the country’s foremost expert on what “arbitration” is supposed to be, a South Carolina law professor named Dennis Nolan.
We think you’re going to find his sworn declaration to be pretty impressive, and perhaps the most brutal denunciation of Scientology’s brand of justice ever. Will this, finally, be what convinces a judge to do something?
READ MORE

Cathy's cruel 'arbitration': Can this denunciation finally upend Scientology's star chamber?

For years we’ve been telling you about Scientology’s cynical strategy for derailing the lawsuits filed by former members: Force them into the church’s own brand of internal “religious arbitration.”

tonyortega.substack.com

 

[Type4_PTS]

I doubt that there is another person on this planet who was better qualified to serve as an expert witness on this issue of arbitration.

Any judge from this point on who insists that people need to use the Scientology arbitration process needs to be impeached.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

I doubt that there is another person on this planet who was better qualified to serve as an expert witness on this issue of arbitration.

Any judge from this point on who insists that people need to use the Scientology arbitration process needs to be impeached.

Knowing well Scientology's conniving, unscrupulous and treacherously wicked methods of "making it go right", I would imagine that the cult must have engaged some wickedly corrupt "capers" and "black ops" to manipulate the legal system sufficiently that judges were coerced, bribed, bullied or blackmailed into sending ex-scientology victims back into the grips of the evil cult they escaped from and are now trying to gain a measure of justice from.

How did the cult do that so often. What would compel a sitting judge to ORDER a litigant to surrender themselves to the cult's obscenely perverse "justice" procedures in a sham "arbitration"? It's the one thing that judges are there to ensure--fairness and neutrality, yet these judges KNEW FULL WELL that Scientology (being the defendant!) was the least imaginable neutral/unbiased party imaginable.

Hopefully, one day, it will be exposed how Scientology manipulated the judges and courts to essentially win their arbitration cases BEFORE THEY EVEN BEGAN by Scientologists being the arbiters. Pure insanity. But it's what one expects of a militant cult that will literally do anything necessary to secure the destruction of their "enemies".

Shocking stuff! But, law professor Dennis Nolan's expert debunking of Scientology's kangaroo court hoaxes (disguised as "arbitrations") might well be the perfect chess move to finally put an end to the cult's diabolical derailing of justice.

..


..

 

[Type4_PTS]

What would compel a sitting judge to ORDER a litigant to surrender themselves to the cult's obscenely perverse "justice" procedures in a sham "arbitration"?

It would be nice if the U.S. Congress subpoenaed judges and required them to answer that question while under oath.

It's tantamount to a judge ordering a rape victim in a civil case to seek justice by redirecting them to an arbitration that's administered by the rapist.