Breaking: New Paperbacks Just Released

ILove2Lurk

. . Lisbeth Salander . . Back in Sweden
~
DMPaperback.webp

Shocker in the book publishing world to rival The Nixon Tapes and The Pentagon Papers.

In 2020, David Miscavige was all worked up about Covid and the pandemic and what was going to happen to his
flailing worldwide organization. One of his inner circle leaked twenty-five years worth of digitized audio recordings
he had secretly made of all his critical meetings with senior executives, attorneys, and decision makers. Not unlike
Richard Nixon, Miscavige had hidden microphones put in all his offices where he met with his top brass. Why?

Presumably to create plausible deniability for his own illegal or out-tech decisions and to document dirt on all his
top people in case he needed leverage to silence them or get them expelled one day.

Most all the critical inflection points and historic meetings that took place from 1980 to 2005 are memorialized
in the book's tape transcripts. Here's just a short list of some the shocking meetings you'll read about:
  • Strategizing Michael Flynn's court case in the early 80's and how to keep all of Hubbard's personal papers
    -- which were absolutely damning and would have sunk the COS -- out of the public domain
  • Beat down of MSH at the Bonaventure Hotel, essentially getting her to sign away all her rights and claims as wife of LRH
  • Strategy session about how to nuke the mission network and how to grab all its bank accounts and real estate
  • Spit-balling session after LRH suddenly died about what to do next -- pretty raw and shocking meetings went on for days
  • Meetings held before each of the three raids on Pat Broeker's locations in search of the missing upper OT levels (also postmortems after each raid}
  • Discussions about how to fabricate the rest of the upper bridge from thin air
  • Meetings with lawyers and OSA staff about how to isolate Pat Broeker, possibly blackmail him, and toss him out
  • How to handle the Mithoff problem
  • Fair-gaming Mayo to the ends of earth strategy session
  • How to get people to pay for OT 9&10 when they don't exist (spoiler: send out official letter on Marty's RTC stationary)
  • Meeting about first Golden Age of Tech (spoiler: it was not about tech; it was about money, and getting everyone to re-buy new services)
So much more, I just can't even begin to list it all.

You want dirt? This is the dirtiest of the dirt by all the people whose names you've heard of for years.
Now you can read what they say to each other behind closed doors when you're not listening.

"Man, I didn't know one
hundredth of this sh*t!"

***** Rating
Don Hubbard


[ . . . . . . ] Hubbard crashed and burned at the end of his life. It’s so obvious to everyone. We need to come up with a target two shore story . . . maybe Hubbard volitionally moving on to do disembodied OT research. We could all live with that, couldn’t we? We don’t have many other choices.
~
[ . . . . . . ] The public will believe anything won't they? It's pretty obvious. They'll all believe what we tell them to believe. That’s the most workable thing about Scientology after all. (loud laughter)
~
[ . . . . . . ] If we tell them the factual truth about Hubbard, the jig will be up right now. Most people will leave. We all have too much invested already. Too much money is on the line, our careers. What will we all end up doing . . . selling laser prints door to door? You gotta understand we, all of us, in this room, are controlling hundreds of millions in reserves. The old man is gone. We’re the gods now. We can do no wrong. Trust me.
~
[ . . . . . . ] Remember, when we raided Broeker's ranches three times in 1988? There’s no upper OT levels. Yingling was there, Rinder, Rathbun, Wilhere, other execs, muscle . . . six Pis. We came up empty. We’ve got nothing but incoherent scribbles on the margins of the old man's worksheets. Mithoff forgot what the old man whispered when he was dying. We’ll have to rely on Mithoff to come up with something . . . pull something out of his ass.
~
[ . . . . . . ] Starkey, Guillaume, everybody on the top floor has heard about it or figured it out already. Everybody's job now is to put up a false front and move forward, business as usual. Executives who balk get RPF'd, forever, if necessary.
~
[ . . . . . . ] Mithoff’s beginning to balk about writing up some upper OT levels. He’s developing a conscience about it all now. He's got to be locked up on the RPF, so nobody sees him for the rest of his life. That's the way it's gotta be . . . otherwise it's all gonna collapse. Everyone's gotta do what they've got to do to survive in this world. What else can I tell you? Go read some history books. That’s the way it goes down.
~
[ . . . . . . ] Oh, we’ll be taken care of OK, don't you worry one bit. See this three thousand dollar suit I'm wearing. You're not gonna buy this without some serious jack comin' in from Flag public. Gotta keep ‘em paying in, don't we?



ls3-webp.30333

:coolwink:
 
We came up empty. We’ve got nothing but incoherent scribbles on the margins of the old man's worksheets. Mithoff forgot what the old man whispered when he was dying.

Aha!!! That is the key missing data!!!

So I asked Don Hubbard if he was possibly there when Ron was dying and whispered the ultimate secret of the universe that would unlock all of Scientology's mighty OT technologies and superpowers.

I will copy and paste Don's written response below:

Originally posted by Don Hubbard
(redacted portion)...yes, I was there. I have never told anyone this before. Only Mithoff, Miscavige and myself were there, we are the only ones that heard what he whispered. We were all stunned out of our minds when we heard his whisper. It was just one word. One secret word that would finally unlock the bridge and produce the first real OTs. (redacted portion)...after that the three of us were shaken and we didn't say a word. We just stepped outside the room and agreed to go "safe" location where there were no recording devices. (redacted portion)...so then Miscavige orders a double beef whopper for himself and we all go sit down at a table, still stunned. Mithoff was sweating profusely and after hesitating a long time he very quietly asked us: "DID YOU HEAR WHAT I HEARD?! Miscavige impatiently barked back "I WANT TO KNOW WHAT EVERYONE HEARD, YOU GO FIRST MITHOFF!"


MITHOFF
When I asked Ron what the future of our church
looks like after he dies, I heard him whisper "ROSEBUD".

MISCAVIGE
He didn't say "rosebud" you
fucking DB idiot! I clearly
heard him say "GROWTH BUD".

MITHOFF
What does that supposed to mean?

MISCAVIGE
It means that Ron predicted unprecedented growth
for our religion until the planet is clear!
Ron called me "bud" because he considered
me to be his good buddy.

DON HUBBARD
Ron didn't say any of that. He clearly
said "GROSS BUD". He was trying to tell
you people that the future is horrible.
It's "gross". And "BUD" is an acronym
that means "beyond use date", meaning
that a product is stale and rotten
due to danger or toxicity, it no longer
should be sold or used. Because the
product is shit. He was trying to
tell you to shut it down. Close the
cult and go home. Game over, capish?


Don then told me he would tell the rest of what happened in his upcoming book!
 
There was a dispute with the publisher . . . .
Massive props! Your skills are incredible. :yes: Sometimes I feel like uninstalling Photoshop and calling it a day, LOL.

I was hoping that this thread would gain some traction and act as a repository of rare collectibles and newly found volumes.
I just love the never-seen-before classic you've offered up!

---------------------------------------------****---------------------------------------

~ The Hubbard-Parsons Connection ~
I spent the day in an old dusty and dark bookstore in downtown Stockholm, where
I'm currently living for now. I happened upon two rare and previously unknown
books published by Don Hubbard, one in 1947 as a pulp and a reprint from 1954.
Both books were in worn condition. The cost me 9,520 SEK (just under $1,000 US).

Ron Hubbard moved into Jack Parsons' mansion in Pasadena in Aug 1945.
He joined Parsons' occult circle and participated in rituals, including the
"Babalon Working." This was a historic intersection of Hubbard with Jack
Parsons' occult workings and began what would later become Scientology.

Babalon Working was a series of occult rituals performed in 1946 by Jack Parsons
and Ron Hubbard, attempting to incarnate goddess Babalon into a human woman.
Parsons, a follower of Aleister Crowley's Thelema, believed Babalon represented a
powerful feminine force, and the rituals were intended to manifest her here on Earth.

Don, skeptical as always of his brother's antics, stood to the side and watched,
but would not take part in the mumbo jumbo these two were chanting all night,
according to his memory of events taking place at the mansion in 1945.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

pasadena-jpg.28357


pasadena2-jpg.28356


---------------------------------------------****---------------------------------------
 

..
donated to this thread courtesy of a generous grant
from the archives of the ILove2Lurk Foundation


pasadena-jpg.28357
.
pasadena2-jpg.28356


LOL LOL LOL
Don Hubbard saw those and began smiling...but then he suddenly stopped and said: "Wait! I don't even remember writing those books!" Then he left and said he needed to go to his storage unit to retrieve his MEMORY PERCEPTIC WHEEL that came free with the book Self Analysis.

.




 
Last edited:
Massive props! Your skills are incredible. :yes: Sometimes I feel like uninstalling Photoshop and calling it a day, LOL.


Ya captured that late 1950s / early 1960s self-help graphic zeitgeist beautifully...


Thank you both, but the skills belong mostly to ChatGPT. I am just directing it, attempting to get it to create whatever I'm visualizing. It seems like it's getting easier with the latest model now (GPT-5.6 Sol).

Back when I was a teenager, I wanted to be a cartoonist, but I couldn't draw to save my life, so that wasn't a realistic option unless I partnered with someone who could draw.
If I had ChatGPT available to me back then, I would have seriously considered doing it for a career.
 
You're really honing your skills as a "director." I can't do what you do, LOL. Bravo.

You're helping to breath some life into this message board. Good times.


I asked ChatGPT to give instructions on how to do what I do to create images. Its answer is within the spoiler.

It goes into WAY more detail than I ever do, or I ever would, unless someone was paying me really well to do this work for them.


How to Direct ChatGPT to Create Images at an Expert Level​

The Art Director Method​

Creating strong AI images is not primarily about discovering a magical prompt.

It is much closer to directing a photographer, illustrator, graphic designer, set designer, lighting director, and Photoshop artist at the same time.

ChatGPT does most of the actual rendering. Your job is to provide the creative judgment.

The basic loop is:

Visualize → Describe → Generate → Critique → Correct → Refine

The people who become good at this are usually not the people who write the longest prompts. They are the people who get good at seeing what is wrong with an image and explaining exactly how it should change.


1. Start With the Idea, Not the Prompt​

Before asking ChatGPT to generate anything, decide what you want the viewer to experience.

Ask yourself:

  • What is the image trying to communicate?
  • What should the viewer notice first?
  • What should they notice second?
  • Is the image funny, disturbing, dramatic, satirical, cinematic, elegant, absurd, documentary-like, etc.?
  • Is there a visual punchline?
  • Is there a specific person, object, sign, document, building, or expression that tells the story?
You do not need every detail figured out.

You do need the central visual idea.

For example, instead of starting with:

Make an image about someone receiving a subpoena.
Think:

I want the viewer to instantly understand that this person has just discovered they have been subpoenaed. The laptop or document needs to make that fact visually unmistakable, and the person's reaction should reinforce it.
That is direction.


2. Describe the Scene as Though You Were Directing a Film Crew​

A powerful prompt usually answers several different questions.

SUBJECT​

Who or what is in the image?

ACTION​

What is happening?

ENVIRONMENT​

Where is it happening?

COMPOSITION​

Where are the important objects located?

CAMERA​

What viewpoint are we seeing?

LIGHTING​

What kind of illumination creates the mood?

EXPRESSION​

What emotion should a person communicate?

STYLE​

Photorealistic? Editorial? Vintage comic? Movie poster? Documentary? Advertising photography?

STORY​

What should someone understand within two seconds of seeing it?

Instead of:

A worried businessman at a computer.
Try:

Create a photorealistic cinematic scene of a businessman seated at his desk staring at his laptop after receiving a deposition subpoena. His expression should show alarm and disbelief. The laptop screen should clearly communicate that a subpoena has been received. Keep the desk realistic and uncluttered enough that the laptop remains visually important. Use dramatic but believable office lighting.
The second version gives the model a scene to stage.


3. Think in Layers​

One of the easiest ways to control a complicated image is to mentally divide it into layers.

Background​

Building, room, landscape, wall, sky, curtains, city, etc.

Middle ground​

Furniture, vehicles, architectural elements, secondary people.

Foreground​

Main person, sign, document, computer, prop, visual joke.

Graphic layer​

Headlines, labels, captions, logos, speech bubbles, warning panels.

For a poster, for example, you might specify:

TOP: Large headline
CENTER: Museum entrance with red carpet
LEFT: Information placard
RIGHT: Valet beside black luxury car holding key fob
BOTTOM: Event information and warning panels
Spatial instructions like top, center, left, right, foreground, background, behind, beside, above, below are extremely useful.

You are blocking the scene.


4. Establish Visual Hierarchy​

Everything cannot be equally important.

Tell ChatGPT what should dominate.

For example:

The headline should be the first thing the eye sees.
The man's facial expression is more important than the background.
The subpoena notice on the laptop must remain readable.
The speech bubble is the punchline, so make it large enough to read immediately on a phone.
This is one of the biggest differences between merely generating an image and directing one.

You are controlling the viewer's eye.


5. Give Concrete Instructions Instead of Vague Adjectives​

AI responds much better to observable details.

Weak:

Make him look really angry.
Better:

Give him a visibly angry expression: furrowed brow, narrowed eyes, tense jaw, lips pressed together.
Weak:

Make it dramatic.
Better:

Use strong directional lighting, deep shadows, a bright focal area around the subject, and a darker background.
Weak:

Make the poster look professional.
Better:

Use a symmetrical advertising-poster composition, restrained typography, strong visual hierarchy, generous spacing, and a polished theatrical lighting treatment.
Whenever possible, convert an adjective into something the camera could actually see.


6. Use Reference Images When Accuracy Matters​

If you want something to resemble a real object, person, package, room, drawing, or previous image, upload the reference.

Then explain what the reference controls.

For example:

Use the uploaded cigarette package as the reference for the package design and proportions.
Or:

Keep the composition from the existing image, but replace the person on the right.
Or:

Preserve the artwork exactly except for the dialogue bubble.
This is important because the model otherwise has to invent details.

A reference image converts some of those guesses into instructions.


7. Do Not Try to Perfect Everything in One Generation​

This is probably the most important lesson.

The first image is a draft.

Treat it the same way a designer treats a first comp.

Look at it and ask:

  • What worked?
  • What is wrong?
  • What is missing?
  • What is distracting?
  • What needs to be larger?
  • What needs to move?
  • What needs to disappear?
  • Is the facial expression right?
  • Is the story instantly understandable?
  • Is the text readable?
  • Is the visual joke landing?
Then issue the next direction.


8. Correct One Problem at a Time When Possible​

Suppose an image is 90% right but the character's expression is wrong.

Do NOT describe the entire picture again from scratch.

Say:

Keep everything else exactly the same. Change only his facial expression so that he looks furious rather than surprised.
Or:

Preserve the existing composition, lighting, clothing, background, camera angle, and text. Only replace the object in his hand with a key fob.
This reduces creative drift.

A useful formula is:

KEEP: what is already correct
CHANGE: what is wrong
DO NOT CHANGE: anything important that might accidentally be altered

Example:

Keep the existing image and composition. Keep the woman's pose, background, lighting, clothing, and camera angle unchanged. Change only the sign she is holding. Replace the existing wording with: "[TEXT]."
That is essentially an AI version of a Photoshop change request.


9. Learn to Diagnose Why an Image Feels Wrong​

Sometimes an image looks wrong even when all the requested objects are technically present.

That usually means the problem is one of these:

Composition​

Objects are badly positioned.

Scale​

Something is too large or too small.

Hierarchy​

The wrong element attracts attention.

Expression​

The face communicates the wrong emotion.

Lighting​

The subject does not visually belong in the scene.

Perspective​

Objects appear to exist on different planes.

Density​

There is too much competing information.

Readability​

Important wording is too small or visually buried.

Storytelling​

The elements exist, but the viewer cannot immediately understand what is happening.

Do not simply say:

I don't like it.
Diagnose it.

For example:

The problem is that the laptop is visually insignificant. Enlarge it slightly and angle the screen toward the viewer so the subpoena becomes one of the main storytelling elements.
That gives ChatGPT something actionable.


10. Treat Text as a Separate Design Problem​

AI-generated text has historically been one of the trickier parts of image creation, although it continues improving dramatically.

For important wording:

  • Specify the exact text.
  • Put it in quotation marks.
  • State where it belongs.
  • Describe its size and hierarchy.
  • Check spelling carefully after generation.
Example:

At the top, in large bold lettering, write exactly:
"GRAND OPENING"
Then inspect it.

If one word is wrong:

Keep the image exactly as it is. Correct only the headline. It must read exactly: "GRAND OPENING."
For posters containing lots of information, build them in sections rather than asking the model to magically organize twenty unrelated pieces of copy.


11. Direct Facial Expressions Carefully​

Faces can change the entire meaning of an image.

Instead of simply naming an emotion, describe its visible characteristics.

For anger:

Furrowed brow, narrowed eyes, tense jaw, stern mouth.
For panic:

Eyes widened, eyebrows raised, mouth slightly open, body visibly tense.
For smugness:

Slight asymmetric smile, relaxed posture, chin marginally elevated.
For suspicion:

Eyes slightly narrowed and directed sideways, restrained expression, subtle tension in the brow.
Think like a director giving an actor notes.


12. Control Camera Position​

Camera instructions can radically change an image.

Experiment with:

  • eye level
  • low angle
  • high angle
  • close-up
  • medium shot
  • wide establishing shot
  • over-the-shoulder
  • first-person viewpoint
  • centered symmetrical composition
  • three-quarter angle
For example:

Show this from the driver's point of view with the steering wheel visible in the foreground.
That instruction does far more than saying:

Show a car interior.
The viewpoint itself tells part of the story.


13. Use Lighting to Control Emotion​

Lighting is storytelling.

Examples:

Serious / cinematic​

Directional lighting, shadows, controlled highlights.

Luxury​

Glossy highlights, warm architectural lighting, polished reflective surfaces.

Ominous​

Dark environment with isolated pools of light.

Documentary​

Natural, believable ambient illumination.

Comic​

Bright, clean, evenly illuminated forms.

Nightlife​

Neon reflections, wet pavement, contrasting light sources.

You don't need to know professional cinematography terminology.

Simply describe where the light seems to come from and what feeling it should create.


14. Protect the Parts That Already Work​

As images improve, this becomes increasingly important.

Suppose version six finally has:

  • the perfect background
  • the correct face
  • the right camera angle
  • good lighting
But one label is wrong.

Tell ChatGPT:

Do not redesign the image. Preserve everything except the specified correction.
The more specific the preservation instructions, the less likely you are to lose something good while fixing something else.


15. Iterate Through Smaller and Smaller Corrections​

Early iterations might involve:

Completely change the composition.
Later iterations might involve:

Move the speech bubble slightly upward.
Then:

Increase the speech bubble text approximately 20%.
Then:

Change one word.
This is normal.

Image creation often progresses from architecture → composition → objects → expressions → typography → polish.

Trying to solve all six simultaneously can create chaos.


16. Design for Where the Image Will Be Seen​

An image that looks great full-screen may fail completely when posted on a message board or viewed on a phone.

Before finishing, ask:

  • Will people see this primarily on phones?
  • Is the headline readable at thumbnail size?
  • Are speech bubbles large enough?
  • Is the punchline obvious without zooming?
  • Are important faces recognizable?
  • Is there unnecessary empty space?
  • Is the file unnecessarily huge?
Sometimes the final stage is not artistic improvement.

It is communication improvement.

A slightly larger speech bubble may matter more than another hour spent perfecting background lighting.


17. Use ChatGPT as a Critic Too​

You do not always need to identify the problem yourself.

Ask:

Analyze this image as an art director. What are the three biggest problems with composition, visual hierarchy, readability, or storytelling?
Or:

The image doesn't quite work for me. Diagnose why before changing anything.
Or:

Which element does the viewer notice first, second, and third?
Then decide whether you agree.

The model can help generate the image and help critique its own work.


18. Separate "Creative Exploration" From "Precision Editing"​

These are two different modes.

Exploration Mode​

Use this when you do not yet know exactly what you want.

Say:

Give me a dramatically different interpretation.
Try a darker cinematic approach.
Reimagine this as a 1950s comic-book advertisement.
Make the visual metaphor more obvious.
You WANT variation.

Precision Mode​

Use this once the image is close.

Say:

Preserve everything else.
Do not alter the composition.
Change only this object.
Keep the person's identity, pose, clothing, lighting, and background unchanged.
You want variation to STOP.

Knowing which mode you are in is a major skill.


19. Don't Be Afraid to Give Tiny Corrections​

You can direct details that might seem absurdly specific:

Move the text upward.
Make the key fob more visible.
Open the package instead of showing it closed.
Put cigarette butts in the ashtray.
Make the document clearly identifiable as a subpoena.
Increase the contrast behind the speech bubble.
Remove the person entirely.
Make the building symmetrical.
Keep everything else unchanged.
Those tiny corrections often make the difference between "AI-generated picture" and an image that actually communicates the intended idea.


20. Develop the Most Important Skill: Visual Criticism​

Prompt writing gets most of the attention.

But the real superpower is:

Knowing what to ask for next.

After every generation, mentally complete this sentence:

"This would be much better if..."
Then turn the answer into the next instruction.

For example:

This would be much better if the viewer could actually read the joke.
So:

Increase the speech bubble and its lettering while preserving the illustration.
Or:

This would be much better if he looked angry rather than vaguely concerned.
So:

Change only his expression. Make the anger unmistakable.
Or:

This would be much better if the viewer understood immediately that this is a deposition subpoena.
So:

Make the subpoena wording visually prominent enough to communicate the situation at a glance.
That cycle is where the real expertise develops.


21. A Useful Master Prompt Structure​

When starting a complex image, this framework works well:

PURPOSE​

What the image should communicate.

SCENE​

What is happening.

SUBJECTS​

People and important objects.

COMPOSITION​

Where everything belongs.

CAMERA​

Viewing angle and framing.

LIGHTING​

Mood and illumination.

STYLE​

Photorealistic, comic, poster, painting, etc.

TEXT​

Exact wording and placement.

PRIORITY​

What absolutely must work.

For example:

Create a cinematic promotional poster.

PURPOSE: The image should feel like the grand opening of a strange, prestigious museum.

COMPOSITION: Use a vertical poster layout. Place a dramatic museum entrance in the center with a red carpet leading toward it. Put a valet scene with a black luxury car on the right. Place an informational placard on the left.

LIGHTING: Nighttime setting with theatrical architectural lighting and reflections on the pavement.

STYLE: Polished, photorealistic luxury advertising campaign.

TEXT: Place the main headline prominently at the top.

PRIORITY: The museum entrance and headline should dominate the image. Secondary information must remain readable without competing with them.
You can add or remove sections depending on the project.


22. The Expert Workflow​

For complicated work, use this sequence:

1. Concept
Decide what the picture means.

2. Rough generation
Get the basic idea onto the screen.

3. Composition correction
Move, enlarge, remove, or reorganize major elements.

4. Story correction
Make sure someone understands what is happening.

5. Character correction
Fix pose, expression, clothing, interaction, etc.

6. Prop correction
Fix objects that carry the story.

7. Typography correction
Fix wording, placement, hierarchy, and readability.

8. Visual polish
Lighting, realism, texture, reflections, atmosphere.

9. Viewing-size test
Make sure it still works small.

10. Final surgical edits
Change only what still needs changing.

You may go through two generations.

You may go through twenty.

There is no prize for accepting version one.


23. The Golden Rule​

Never assume that because the AI generated something, you have to accept its creative decisions.

You are the director.

If the car is wrong, change the car.

If the joke cannot be read, enlarge it.

If a person's expression is wrong, redirect the performance.

If the composition is cluttered, remove things.

If the visual metaphor isn't obvious, strengthen it.

If something excellent appears unexpectedly, keep it.

The model supplies enormous visual capability.

You supply taste, intention, judgment, and persistence.

That combination is where the interesting work happens.


The One-Sentence Version​

Picture what you want, describe it concretely, examine what the AI actually produced rather than what you hoped it produced, and keep giving increasingly precise art-direction notes until the image communicates exactly what you intended.
 
Last edited:
..

That was cool! I browsed thru it and it sure seems that AI has learned a lot in the past year. Last year when i tried to "keep the image" (and gave secondary prompts to "only correct ONE (1) thing", ChatGPT could not do it. I had discussions with ChatGPT and it explained why a NEW IMAGE had to be generated. But , now I see from your writeup that ChatGPT has successfully acquired a major new "ABILITY ATTAINED"!!

From this, we can extrapolate and confirm that ChatGPT is on Ron's Bridge and has soared past Clear onto the OT levels!

..
 
Back
Top