Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hubbard seems to be tirelessly conditioning the reader to believe that exteriorization is an automatic result of Scientology processing whereas those who spent decades trying to achieve that state would tell you that it is not.
Hubbard seems to be tirelessly conditioning the reader to believe that exteriorization is an automatic result of Scientology processing whereas those who spent decades trying to achieve that state would tell you that it is not.
From page 18: "long experience that one never changes the process just because somebody compulsively exteriorizes. S-C -S is probably more susceptible to compulsive exteriorization than any other single process, and as it is run preclears fly into their heads and out of them at a great rate and eventually get to a state quite ordinarily where they can move into the head or out of the head at will."
All part of the hypnosis, if you read it enough it becomes a certainty, "number of times through equals certainty". Yet B.S. it remained.
In Chapter 12 of "Barefaced Messiah," a woman named Carmen D'Alessio recalls LRH giving her this command in London in September 1952 (which is before HCOB's). I think I may have seen an even earlier mention, but don't know where now.@pineapple
Also, in early days, there was "one-shot Clear" with the auditing command "be three feet back of your head".
(I don't have any HCOB date for this... or maybe this was before HCOBs.)
It was designated "Route 1" in the book Creation Of Human Ability (1954). Everything else in scientology is basically for the lesser beings who can't achieve Clear on Route 1.@pineapple
Also, in early days, there was "one-shot Clear" with the auditing command "be three feet back of your head".
(I don't have any HCOB date for this... or maybe this was before HCOBs.)
What came as quite a surprise to me at the time was back when I was on volunteer staff the summer after my junior year in high school (1972) a guy was just shooting the breeze with me at the reception desk that I was manning and slipped in the "be 3 feet back..." and I went out the back of my head and panicked so much that I pulled myself back in after just seconds of being out. I only viewed a grey streaked black landscape and nothing more while feeling like a baby bird that fell out of the nest and didn't know how to fly. So the biggest goal I had as an early Scientologist had now been achieved and turned out to be a terrifying bum experience! To this day I've never exteriorized again though I tried and I've tried back in my clam days. Was it an illusion? I doubt it having been there for it. And I'd only read a couple of basic books, so I'd never been exposed to the command. It just took me entirely by surprise. Not much of a science when it only works once in a blue moon.It was designated "Route 1" in the book Creation Of Human Ability (1954). Everything else in scientology is basically for the lesser beings who can't achieve Clear on Route 1.
It was designated "Route 1" in the book Creation Of Human Ability (1954). Everything else in scientology is basically for the lesser beings who can't achieve Clear on Route 1.
What came as quite a surprise to me at the time was back when I was on volunteer staff the summer after my junior year in high school (1972) a guy was just shooting the breeze with me at the reception desk that I was manning and slipped in the "be 3 feet back..." and I went out the back of my head and panicked so much that I pulled myself back in after just seconds of being out. I only viewed a grey streaked black landscape and nothing more while feeling like a baby bird that fell out of the nest and didn't know how to fly. So the biggest goal I had as an early Scientologist had now been achieved and turned out to be a terrifying bum experience! To this day I've never exteriorized again though I tried and I've tried back in my clam days. Was it an illusion? I doubt it having been there for it. And I'd only read a couple of basic books, so I'd never been exposed to the command. It just took me entirely by surprise. Not much of a science when it only works once in a blue moon.
I recall reading that.
Interesting, especially about Israel Regardie being a student of Crowley's as it was his book "The Secret Doctrines of the Rosicrucian's" which preceded and lead me to Scientology. I had no idea of his Crowley connection though it makes perfect sense.
Interesting, especially about Israel Regardie being a student of Crowley's as it was his book "The Secret Doctrines of the Rosicrucian's" which preceded and lead me to Scientology. I had no idea of his Crowley connection though it makes perfect sense.
Prior to the "Be three feet back..." incident I had experienced vertigo only once while up in the St. Louis Arch with it swaying in the wind. I could ride my unicycle till the wheel fell off and wasn't at all prone to vertigo.
The incident with the "exteriorization" was an instantaneous whoosh, I'm out back, I notice that everything looks dark with grayish streaks, then I start frantically pulling to get back in w/o being able to stop myself until I'm back. I was seated at the time so I wouldn't say offhand that vertigo explains it.
Remember, I'm one who will say there were snippets of workability in Scientology that were mixed with and melded to lies to put money in Hubbard's pockets.
If an organization gleefully fleeces it's public by shaking them upside down for every dollar they have and will ever have while willfully plunging them into dire poverty, it is one fucking evil organization. And Scientology is and was. So by saying that something of theirs's once worked on me I'm not endorsing them by any means. Hubbard was a "lie weaver" and could weave a lie into anything.
If there's a dispute about whether or not we are spiritual beings in the first place who would even be capable of such feats, I can't help there as there seems to be different types of beings in our midst in this realm.
But still, it could have been "meant" to induce a sense of vertigo by Hubbard, certainly!
I think one of the terms used to describe it is 'religious experience', which doesn't sound very materialistic. For all my materialism and reductionism I confess that I had a couple of those 'experiences' in my early twenties and they had nothing to do with drugs, meditation or scientology, but they were profound and I've never forgotten them.Millions or billions of people over time have had transcendental, peak, satori or however you want to describe it type experiences. Ascribing scientific explanations to all such experience is a possibility but not a necessity imo. The more you try to "figure it out" the more it tends toward scientific materialism which is fine if that's where someone wants to be.