Veda
Well-known member
After leaving Scientology Inc. in the early 1980s, when it was obvious I was no longer compatible (even as a public) with the organization, I began auditing outside, and in defiance of, the Organization. It seemed, at the time, like a reasonable first step in reviewing Scientology.
I audited most of the Grade Chart on pcs, but drew the line at auditing Hubbard "case" which he had superimposed on, and injected into, Scientologists, particularly most intensively during the so called OT levels.
At the pc's request, I did provide a sampling of various discontinued, but interesting, 1950s processes, and also NOTs.
I advised the pc that anything more than a quick sampling of NOTs would be mistake, but, assuming there might - at some time - be another being in one's space, knowing how to enter into two way communication, and resolve any possible difficulty might be a good idea. (Remember this was a long time ago.)
One day, in session, a "being" showed up during session and interrupted the session. The "being" (who knows what it really was) was asked (with me acting as the C/S and the pc acting s the auditor), "What are you?" and responded "A Solitary Angry Man." Well, two way communication occurred and evidentially S.A.M. went on his way.
(This was very very different from Hubbard's idea of the universe crawling with problematic degraded entities.)
Mostly it was to satisfy the pc's curiosity. It was a one time action.
This post was partially prompted by an inquiry from someone about my stating that I found 0.1% of NOTs to be of interest.
For anyone curious, here's a link to a book. Part 2 of the book contains a chapter titled Are You Haunted? which provides a sampling of views on the topic:
Link to part two of the book, Chapter 12.
I audited most of the Grade Chart on pcs, but drew the line at auditing Hubbard "case" which he had superimposed on, and injected into, Scientologists, particularly most intensively during the so called OT levels.
At the pc's request, I did provide a sampling of various discontinued, but interesting, 1950s processes, and also NOTs.
I advised the pc that anything more than a quick sampling of NOTs would be mistake, but, assuming there might - at some time - be another being in one's space, knowing how to enter into two way communication, and resolve any possible difficulty might be a good idea. (Remember this was a long time ago.)
One day, in session, a "being" showed up during session and interrupted the session. The "being" (who knows what it really was) was asked (with me acting as the C/S and the pc acting s the auditor), "What are you?" and responded "A Solitary Angry Man." Well, two way communication occurred and evidentially S.A.M. went on his way.
(This was very very different from Hubbard's idea of the universe crawling with problematic degraded entities.)
Mostly it was to satisfy the pc's curiosity. It was a one time action.
This post was partially prompted by an inquiry from someone about my stating that I found 0.1% of NOTs to be of interest.
For anyone curious, here's a link to a book. Part 2 of the book contains a chapter titled Are You Haunted? which provides a sampling of views on the topic:
Link to part two of the book, Chapter 12.