David Miscavige Kept His Word (De Vocht) Feb 10, 2026

Karen#1

Well-known member
What Changed After I Left?


I recently had the pleasure to meet and have a long discussion with Mitch Brisker for the first time while I was in Los Angeles.
Our paths had crossed numerous times at Gold and Int Base, but we never really knew each other. He, poor guy, had to deal with Jenny Linson (my ex, one of Dave’s executioners) often enough, though. Like me, and like a small number of others, Mitch worked closely with David Miscavige. He understands him. He understands how he thinks, how he reacts, and what actually motivates him.
What was remarkable was that Mitch was still closely involved for more than a decade after I had already left.
That was exactly what I was looking for. Recent, firsthand insight.
I had so many questions. What did things actually look like now? What had changed? What had not?
What happened to Marc Yager? To Guillaume Lesevre? To Mark Ingber? To Jenny DeVocht Linson?
What was going on at Gold Base? Were org boards and stats ever issued? Did “the Hole” still exist the way it did when I left? Did Dave ever move in and use Building 50?
Had there been any real strategic shift at all?
Did David Miscavige change anything as a result of all the negative publicity and outcry?
After our conversation, I walked away with confirmation of something I had suspected for a long time but had never been able to verify.
Nothing had changed.
Not the direction.
Not the strategy.
Not the mindset.
David Miscavige has been completely true to his word.
A Man With One Playbook


Miscavige is like a rat in a maze.
He knows one thing, and he has one, maybe two, tools he is adept at using: legalese and propaganda. Both are backed by effectively unlimited sums of money.
He goes around and around, doing the same things over and over. It is all he knows. The difference now is that he is more afraid than ever. More suspicious. More reclusive. Less trusting. Less visible.
He still trusts no one.
He still allows no independence.
He still tolerates no deviation.
David Miscavige cannot operate any other way. He never has. He is incapable of it because he has backed himself against the wall. Or perhaps he is simply not capable of doing anything else.
And he has not changed a single thing behind the walls he built. He may have put up some new walls, but behind them it is the same old story.

READ MORE

 
From the article:
He is Hubbard’s executor and the legal team’s enforcer.

He carried out a strategy devised while Hubbard was still alive but no longer functional by attorneys whose concern was not faith, but liability.

it makes it seem the the lawyers are the ones really in control.

I’d like this explored further.
Who are these lawyers? And what do they get out of Scientology? I assume fat fees in perpetuity, but anything else?
 
Tom nailed it.
Stick a fork in it!
Scientology is dead!
From the article:


it makes it seem the the lawyers are the ones really in control.

I’d like this explored further.
Who are these lawyers? And what do they get out of Scientology? I assume fat fees in perpetuity, but anything else?

I'd guess some of them are on the Bridge themselves, but maybe not all.

About the money running out; I think one of two things would need to happen for that. Either Scientology's tax exempt status could be revoked, which would make the organisation much poorer overnight (but as yet there's no sign of that happening), or the whales could become so disillusioned with Miscavige's leadership that they sue him for their money back. I can't see that happening either,
 
Last edited:
Tom nailed it.
Stick a fork in it!
Scientology is dead!


It will be dead when the money runs out, not before. That’s my prediction.


While these two posts above seem to conflict, they both seem true for me somehow.

The Scientology organization we believed we joined IS dead. But it's transformed into an organization with a completely different purpose, including the acquisition of real estate using other people's money.

A thought that came into my mind was that Scientology is neither dead nor alive. It is undead. :D

Wikipedia:
The undead are beings in mythology, legend, or fiction that are deceased but behave as if they were alive. A common example of an undead being is a corpse reanimated by supernatural forces, by the application of either the deceased's own life force or that of a supernatural being (such as a demon, or other evil spirit). The undead may be incorporeal (ghosts) or corporeal (mummies, vampires, skeletons, and zombies).




I asked ChatGPT: "Can a cult be undead?"

ChatGPT:
Only if it has a gym membership at the Cemetery Fitness Club 🧟‍♂️

In the literal sense, no. A cult is a social organism, not a vampire. It does not crawl out of a crypt when the moon is full.

But in the metaphorical sense? Absolutely.

A cult can be “undead” when:

• It loses members but never quite dissolves
• Its founder dies but their voice keeps issuing commands from old recordings and policy letters
• Its prophecies fail, yet the belief system shapeshifts instead of collapsing
• It rebrands, relocates, rephrases… but the core control mechanisms remain intact

That is institutional necromancy. The body weakens, but the doctrine animates it like invisible wiring.

Some groups become ghost-structures. Membership shrinks. Public influence fades. Yet internally, the rules remain frozen in amber. Leadership insists nothing has changed. Critics are still enemies. Dissent is still heresy. The script keeps running long after the cultural moment that birthed it has expired.

In that sense, “undead” describes systems that survive not because they are thriving, but because they are rigid. They cannot adapt, so they ossify. They persist through fear, sunk cost, isolation, or legal fortifications rather than vitality.

It is less like a zombie and more like a fossil that insists it is still breathing.

Why do you ask? Are you thinking about a specific group that feels… strangely immortal?
 
While these two posts above seem to conflict, they both seem true for me somehow.

The Scientology organization we believed we joined IS dead. But it's transformed into an organization with a completely different purpose, including the acquisition of real estate using other people's money.

A thought that came into my mind was that Scientology is neither dead nor alive. It is undead. :D

Wikipedia:
The undead are beings in mythology, legend, or fiction that are deceased but behave as if they were alive. A common example of an undead being is a corpse reanimated by supernatural forces, by the application of either the deceased's own life force or that of a supernatural being (such as a demon, or other evil spirit). The undead may be incorporeal (ghosts) or corporeal (mummies, vampires, skeletons, and zombies).




I asked ChatGPT: "Can a cult be undead?"

ChatGPT:
Only if it has a gym membership at the Cemetery Fitness Club 🧟‍♂️

In the literal sense, no. A cult is a social organism, not a vampire. It does not crawl out of a crypt when the moon is full.

But in the metaphorical sense? Absolutely.

A cult can be “undead” when:

• It loses members but never quite dissolves
• Its founder dies but their voice keeps issuing commands from old recordings and policy letters
• Its prophecies fail, yet the belief system shapeshifts instead of collapsing
• It rebrands, relocates, rephrases… but the core control mechanisms remain intact

That is institutional necromancy. The body weakens, but the doctrine animates it like invisible wiring.

Some groups become ghost-structures. Membership shrinks. Public influence fades. Yet internally, the rules remain frozen in amber. Leadership insists nothing has changed. Critics are still enemies. Dissent is still heresy. The script keeps running long after the cultural moment that birthed it has expired.

In that sense, “undead” describes systems that survive not because they are thriving, but because they are rigid. They cannot adapt, so they ossify. They persist through fear, sunk cost, isolation, or legal fortifications rather than vitality.

It is less like a zombie and more like a fossil that insists it is still breathing.

Why do you ask? Are you thinking about a specific group that feels… strangely immortal?

Good post. I don't think Miscavige really cares whether the organisation is "undead" or not though as long as he can continue to enjoy the same sybaritic lifestyle and hob nob with celebrities like Tom Cruise.
 
Back
Top