Bill
Well-known member
Yeah Veda, I know all that.Hubbard didn't invent mental processing. It's an old idea and practice.
Even today one hears people, who've had zero involvement with Scientology, saying, "I'm still processing it," etc.
Yeah Veda, I know all that.Hubbard didn't invent mental processing. It's an old idea and practice.
Even today one hears people, who've had zero involvement with Scientology, saying, "I'm still processing it," etc.
You can solo Grade 5 style processes. The church says no you cannot, but fuck them.Solo auditing is not done that way, amigo. Also, you failed to state the End Phenomena of this process you made up.
You can solo Grade 5 style processes. The church says no you cannot, but fuck them.
No I will not feed you the cog of this process.
Here's one from Steve Bisbey, C/S of the old AAC (Advanced Ability Centre) in East Grinstead. Run these alternately to a good win;
1 / What was it safe to say to (a person in the CofS)
2 / What was it not safe to say to (the same person in the CofS)
(Note from Steve; be prepared for a long session.)
It's a long time since I read his suggestions, but I think Steve would have selected the "people in the CofS" as reading items from a list.
To those who know how to solo:
Tell me a time you agreed with Scientology/Scientologists.Tell me a time you disagreed with Scientology/Scientologists.Alternate the two commands to ep. Those should break you free of their morphic field / group mind.
.
.Seriously, any adult needing a 'process' like the ones mentioned on this thread would probably benefit greatly from seeing a genuine therapist.
Sorry in advance if what follows sounds patronising, but I don't see much of a difference between someone offering a process based on Scn tech, such as the one I posted, and what you see on a non-Scn website such as Emoclear - if it helps, it's good whatever it is.@Cat's Squirrel ... please refer to post#23.
Seriously, any adult needing a 'process' like the ones mentioned on this thread would probably benefit greatly from seeing a genuine therapist.
I'm so tired of the dumbing down (amongst other things) that we are seeing around the world in the last few decades, it's incredibly sad and quite scary.
Hubbard was well ahead of his time when he cobbled scientology together and made fools of some good people.
Sorry in advance if what follows sounds patronising, but I don't see much of a difference between someone offering a process based on Scn tech, such as the one I posted, and what you see on a non-Scn website such as Emoclear - if it helps, it's good whatever it is.
self-helpapedia.com - self helpapedia Resources and Information.
self-helpapedia.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, self-helpapedia.com has it all. We hope you find what you are searching for!www.self-helpapedia.com
I think it may be different for people who have spent a long time in the CofS and for whom any mention of Scn has a lot of unpleasant memories of their time "in" (even I have some of those, and I wasn't in the CofS for all that long and was never on staff).
Since I mentioned Steve Bisbey, it's only fair to point out that he moved away from standard tech over the time I knew him; when I first went there in 1986, he was so pro-standard tech that I even had to fill in a KSW form after I'd completed an auditing cycle or a training course (he dropped this requirement later on). He later became one of the founders of Metapsychology.
I'm by no means a standard tech purist myself; my main problem with it when I was having auditing was that I didn't think it went "deep enough".
Lastly;
"I don't have to "make it clear to newbies that they shouldn't attempt to visit a scn org for any reason either, not even out of curiosity"."
I can't speak for anyone else here but I would be very concerned if I discovered that my posts here had that effect on people reading them (especially newbies), to the point where it would probably stop me posting here.
Just a note that Hubbard did not originate "Be 3 feet in back of your head". Another person invented it, and Hubbard squirreled it. I met this man, and believe him. He said the original command was "Try not to be 3 feet in back of your head." I do not recall his name. I met him at one of Aida Thomas' oldtimers get-togethers. Maybe she remembers who he was. Or maybe Trey Lotz knows.During a time - and a saner and more civil time it was, in contrast to now - when there were protest gatherings at various Hubbard monuments (Orgs) and properties, there was discussion of what words might be shown on a placard, or spoken or politely shouted, to the occasionally spotted Hubbard monument caretaker or customer.
Some people had the idea of a succinct "one shot clear command" that would pop people out of Scientological indoctrination: "release" them from the Scientological implant of "Scientology = Survive!/No Scientology = Succumb," or "blow" their Scientological "circuits."
(Kind of) a reverse, benign (well intentioned) version of this:
Aleister Crowley's terse summation of Yoga - "Sit still. Stop thinking. Shut up. Get Out!" - comes to mind as an example of a prototype of Hubbard's (P. T. Barnum-esque) "Be three feet back of your head!"
As far as I know, no one ever came up with an effective "one shot clear of Scientology" command.
A less abrupt, more gradual, approach, as provided by the op of this thread, might be more realistic.
No?
Then consider the statements of some ex Scientologists as to some processes that were discontinued in Scientology because they (supposedly) resulted in people thinking they didn't need Scientology anymore. Is there anything to that?
In any event, there was a time before there was a Grade Chart, and people would sometimes bounce in, and then out, of Scientology, sometimes becoming the gurus of their own movements.
Hubbard found this distressing and, subsequently, invented Fair Game, Disconnection, "Ethics," and the Grade Chart with its ever-present and mysterious, and vital, next level.
The ever-lengthening Grade Chart being introduced
Page three of a Non Remimeo HCO Executive Letter, regarding "squirrels," of 27 September 1965,
"to Org staff from Ron."
It's pretty obvious that Hubbard did not want people passing through Scientology. He wanted Scientology to possess them.
Breaking the spell of that possession, rather than making a person renounce every tiny piece of the subject, seems to be a valid objective.
Yet, there are those who think that's silly and we should just...
Years ago Alanzo had a topic called "How to stop Thinking and Feeling with Scientology". He even wrote a "process" for it and I think you were supposed to "run it" for two weeks.
Another part of it was identifying all clamspeak terms which come to mind and replacing them with King's English.
I mentioned to him that the word "process" itself is sort of clamspeak. Most therapies would refer to their "procedures" and he agreed. People don't go into a therapy or a practice to get "processed". Processing occurs in sausage factories.
The person's name was Evans Farber.Just a note that Hubbard did not originate "Be 3 feet in back of your head". Another person invented it, and Hubbard squirreled it. I met this man, and believe him. He said the original command was "Try not to be 3 feet in back of your head." I do not recall his name. I met him at one of Aida Thomas' oldtimers get-togethers. Maybe she remembers who he was. Or maybe Trey Lotz knows.
Ed
that may be true or not. Doesn't matter, that one process never really created exterior from the body, nor did any scientology process to OT8. Nobody has been able to exteriorize freely from the body at will. You know, free being.Just a note that Hubbard did not originate "Be 3 feet in back of your head". Another person invented it, and Hubbard squirreled it. I met this man, and believe him. He said the original command was "Try not to be 3 feet in back of your head." I do not recall his name. I met him at one of Aida Thomas' oldtimers get-togethers. Maybe she remembers who he was. Or maybe Trey Lotz knows.
Ed
here's the stupid rhetoric book:that may be true or not. Doesn't matter, that one process never really created exterior from the body, nor did any scientology process to OT8. Nobody has been able to exteriorize freely from the body at will. You know, free being.
I believe the process is in COHA book, creation of human ability, or maybe the PDC's, forget now.
Anyways, it's bullshit really.