Scientology’s Lying Response to Masterson Conviction

[Karen#1]

Excerpt:

Of course, following the Masterson conviction, scientology put out a statement about how they have been subjected to “prejudice” and “bigotry.” Here it is, in all it’s holier-than-thou sliminess, and their usual outright lies.


The prosecution’s introduction of religion into this trial was an unprecedented violation of the First Amendment and affects the due process rights of every American. The Church was not a party to this case and religion did not belong in this proceeding as Supreme Court precedent has maintained for centuries.


The District Attorney unconscionably centered his prosecution on the defendant’s religion and fabrications about the Church to introduce prejudice and inflame bigotry. The DA elicited testimony and descriptions of Scientology beliefs and practices which were uniformly FALSE.


The Court’s statement of Church doctrine was her own invention, DEAD WRONG, and blatantly unconstitutional.


The Church has no policy prohibiting or discouraging members from reporting criminal conduct of anyone—Scientologists or not—to law enforcement. Quite the opposite, Church policy explicitly demands Scientologists abide by all laws of the land. All allegations to the contrary are totally FALSE.


There is not a scintilla of evidence supporting the scandalous allegations that the Church harassed the accusers. Every single instance of supposed
harassment by the Church is FALSE, and has been debunked.~~~READ MORE

Scientology’s Lying Response to Masterson Conviction

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

.

There is not a scintilla of evidence supporting the scandalous allegations that the Church harassed the accusers. Every single instance of supposed harassment by the Church is FALSE, and has been debunked.~~~READ MORE

.
Shockingly, that happens to be true.

There is not a scintilla of evidence--there is in fact an ocean of evidence.

.

 

[guanoloco]

This stuff reminds me why I'm an ex-Scientologist. I'm an ex because of Scientology. Specifically these types of responses.

I don't know what would've been the outcome had these incidents been reported immediately but we all know that these accusers were prevented from notifying the police or they ran the risk of getting Declared for Suppressive Acts.

Scientology sought to squelch any leaks of this to prevent exactly what they have created - negative and bad PR. Had Scientology done the right and correct thing initially they wouldn't be putting out these statements now. In fact, they would have a respected public image.

But instead of doing the right thing they are ONLY concerned with their public image - this stems directly from Hubbard - and so they cut corners and lie, cheat and steal to protect and project a controlled public image.

This has the opposite effect because it's forced. They force this image - which results in a worse public image than if they had done nothing. What would their PR image be if they did the right thing?

It's short-term immediate gain for long-term loss.

It's enantiodromia. The thickest book in Hubbard's Admin encyclopedia set is the Div 6 public image book.

Scientology has the worst public image of anything that I'm aware of.

Statements such as this is why I'm an ex. I would read these or hear these when "in" and knew that they were lies.

I'll never forget the time I saw Rinder on TV talking about the expense of an OT level - maybe 5 or something.

He spun the story to make it sound like the parishioner donated what she felt the true value of the level was. The way that he explained it made it sound that the parishioner and not the Church was in charge of how much they were willing to pay for a service. In other words, there was no set price for the "donation".

I knew that was a lie just like all Scientologists know that the above statement is a lie and that these accusers weren't allowed to report anything to authorities.

I also knew that no one and nobody wants OT 5. In fact, I'm willing to bet that every single person would skip OT 5 if they had the choice.

The only reason that this person was doing OT 5 and paying the amount for OT 5 was because the Church of Scientology said so.

What the person wanted was OT 8 or higher and the only way that they could get OT 8 or higher was by buying and doing OT 5 - something that nobody wants.

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

.

This stuff reminds me why I'm an ex-Scientologist. I'm an ex because of Scientology. Specifically these types of responses. I don't know what would've been the outcome had these incidents been reported immediately but we all know that these accusers were prevented from notifying the police or they ran the risk of getting Declared for Suppressive Acts.

.
I hear what you are saying but I don't understand why you think that is an outpoint.

When someone gets brutally raped or diabolically defrauded by paying a half million dollars for magic powers that don't exist, that person is quite clearly committing suppressive acts and should be declared. I am talking about the victim that was raped and/or bankrupted.

They're the SPs!

How dare they spread entheta about the church.

When we hammer out of existence these anti-social personalities, we can finally have a world without insanity and criminality.

..

 

[onceuponatime]

I'm sure scientology will try to draw similarities between confession and what happens in scientology. There's a big difference between not revealing crimes confessed and actively working to stop victims from going to the police. I wonder if their internal policies will be changing as a result of this. Maybe we'll finally get a GAT III ethics book.

 

[guanoloco]

.


.
I hear what you are saying but I don't understand why you think that is an outpoint.

When someone gets brutally raped or diabolically defrauded by paying a half million dollars for magic powers that don't exist, that person is quite clearly committing suppressive acts and should be declared. I am talking about the victim that was raped and/or bankrupted.

They're the SPs!

How dare they spread entheta about the church.

When we hammer out of existence these anti-social personalities, we can finally have a world without insanity and criminality.

..

These women that Masterson raped...

...just what the hell did they do to pull it in?

"It" being Masterson...

 

[onceuponatime]

.


.
I hear what you are saying but I don't understand why you think that is an outpoint.

When someone gets brutally raped or diabolically defrauded by paying a half million dollars for magic powers that don't exist, that person is quite clearly committing suppressive acts and should be declared. I am talking about the victim that was raped and/or bankrupted.

They're the SPs!

How dare they spread entheta about the church.

When we hammer out of existence these anti-social personalities, we can finally have a world without insanity and criminality.

..

These women that Masterson raped...

...just what the hell did they do to pull it in?

"It" being Masterson...

Just to be clear to any outsiders who may be browsing, under the radar scientologists, etc. Scientology/Scientologists literally think this way. To Scientologists the victims in this case are the SPs, and even if they had something bad happen to them it's their fault because they pulled it in. These posts might seem like jokes but it is an accurate representation of the scientology thought process.

 

[Enthetan]

To Scientologists the victims in this case are the SPs, and even if they had something bad happen to them it's their fault because they pulled it in.

Simple thought experiment to illustrate a point:

If the father of one of the girls that Masterson raped went up to Masterson and beat him to a bloody pulp, do you think that HCO would tell Masterson to not report it to police, and order him to sec checking to discover what he did to pull it in?

My point being that, in Scientology, some people are more important than others, and important people are allowed to do things to unimportant people, but not the other way around.

 

[guanoloco]

Simple thought experiment to illustrate a point:

If the father of one of the girls that Masterson raped went up to Masterson and beat him to a bloody pulp, do you think that HCO would tell Masterson to not report it to police, and order him to sec checking to discover what he did to pull it in?

My point being that, in Scientology, some people are more important than others, and important people are allowed to do things to unimportant people, but not the other way around.

What you're describing is the infamous Double Standard Tech.

You see, everyone gets one tech - Standard Tech.

However, the super BIG thetans get Double Standard Tech.

 

[Type4_PTS]

Here's Amy Scobee's response to David Miscavige (who is clearly the author of the CoS response).

 

[HelluvaHoax!]

What you're describing is the infamous Double Standard Tech.

You see, everyone gets one tech - Standard Tech.

However, the super BIG thetans get Double Standard Tech.

That DoubleTech is quite the bargain. . .

Twice the tech---a quarter of the O/W writeups!

Big beings never have to run the "4 flows", only the one (1) flow detailing the overts & crimes that DBs, PTS's and SPs committed to sabotage the big being's otherwise brilliant humanitarian contributions & soaring upstats.

ps: I couldn't help wondering, is DoubleTech related to DoubleThink? Does DoubleTech have a cool slogan like "War is Peace" or "Freedom is Slavery"?


..

...

 

[guanoloco]

That DoubleTech is quite the bargain. . .

Twice the tech---a quarter of the O/W writeups!

Big beings never have to run the "4 flows", only the one (1) flow detailing the overts & crimes that DBs, PTS's and SPs committed to sabotage the big being's otherwise brilliant humanitarian contributions & soaring upstats.

ps: I couldn't help wondering, is DoubleTech related to DoubleThink? Does DoubleTech have a cool slogan like "War is Peace" or "Freedom is Slavery"?


..

...

I'm so glad that you asked. It most definitely DOES jive up with DoubleThink. It's DoubleStandardTech and here's a good example from way back when:

Top 100 Stupid Moments in Scientology - PART ONE

Re: Top 100 Stupid Moments in Scientology GL, where does this come from? It reads like it was written rather than spoken. Shortly after LRH died we received a letter addressed to us in CLW with a peel-and-stick label and no return address. Inside was a "Message From Ron" on yellow paper...

forum.exscn.net

I had thought about Hubbard and his various policies and bulletins that set in stone barring himself from his own services. In fact, Hubbard was out-qual as an exec. Not only would he not have been qualed for the SO or HCO or as an exec - he would've been an illegal PC and denied services for being a crim and having government security clearances as well as working as a Chaos Merchant reporter - having a blackmailable past and all that...financial irregularities, out 2D and right on down the line - to say nothing about his IRS predicament.

Ron’s Recruit Cycle​

OK, let’s see…Ron, right? OK, Ron. I’ve got your Life History here and we’ll go over that together, OK?

Ooooooooh! A Naval Officer and third generation at that! Looks like your father was Navy and you’ve been on every sea on Earth…and friends with Senators and such...and the Secretary of the Navy, no less…my, oh my!

Alrighty, then, let’s see…we’ll we’ve got quite a drug history here, don’t we? Let’s see, there’s pinks and greys and this bit about rum and there’s talk here about people seeing you all grey with empty bottles and smoking pot and cocaine and such. That’s going to be quite the list on your Scientology DRD!

Now’s there’s a little bit about lacing your children’s gum with phenobarbital that’s a little troubling…looks like it was an apparent failure only when you were attempting to darken them. Hmmm…”darken them”…we do have some policy or something about “other practices” somewhere…that could be a little troubling, as well, Ron.

Now, before we get too into the 2D stuff let’s take a look at our institutional history, shall we? Hmmm…this bit about begging the VA for psychiatric help is, quite frankly, disturbing…and then there’s that report of the college professor finding you in a straight jacket screaming out that you were Jesus Christ…what’s that all about, Ron? There’s quite a bit about faking injuries for financial gain and writing fraudulent letters to the VA begging for benefits and such…has anyone explained to you the methods of exchange and creating a PTS situation by accepting money unearned…especially from the government? In our Ethics book our dear founder explains a situation where an individual is receiving money from wealthy relatives and how they were PTS and had to write that they were spending that money on other things and must discontinue receiving those funds. Then there’s a little policy we have about “Pretended PTS” to get out of work or escape discipline and other policies about “False Reports” and such…where were we, then?

OK, let’s see…Naval Intelligence…hmmmm…tsk, tsk…I’m certain there’s a snag here with something or other about “Illegal PCs”…I’d imagine you had some sort of government security clearance in that role?

And what about this business of Operation Snowwhite and Operation Freakout? Would getting others illegally infiltrating the government, stealing government documents and attempting to frame an innocent person to drive them to suicide be considered "encouraging out-ethics" or "condoning out-ethics in others"?

Yes…well now. Moving right along to the second dynamic…there’s quite a little bit about masturbation here, isn’t there, Ron? And what’s this business about a 42-year old man buggering an 18-year old student and getting her pregnant...I'm sure the two of you had a lot in common? Well, looks like you married her at 2 months preggers, even though she went to prison later on and you didn’t disconnect from a known criminal guilty of a criminal past, and then there’s this first wife and kids that you abandoned…you know the ones…the ones that you laced their gum with drugs? Yeah, seems like you ditched them high and dry in ’43 or so and then claimed that YOU were abandoned at the end of the war. And then without divorcing that one you wound up in that crazy devil worshipping “free sex” cult and making that Moonchild…excuse me for a sec, Ron…

George! Listen, George! Would it be considered an “irregular 2D practice” to try to make the Antichrist in a devil worship free sex cult with masturbation spells? Huh...what's that? Oh, OK! Thanks, George!

Where were we? Oh, yeah! And then you ran off with Parsons’ girlfriend and money…after you were writing in your “other practices” Affirmation tech that you really love Parsons and wouldn’t hurt him…and then you married this girl while you were still married to Polly…and then you cheated on this Sara and had Black Dianetics practiced on her (I just know we have some policies or issues about Black Dianetics around this place somewhere) and when she wanted a divorce you kidnapped your daughter and ran to Cuba…would that be a “blow”?

Oh, well, let’s go on, shall we? More on this “Affirmation” tech…there’s talk about virgins getting raped and the lot of women is fornication and pour it in them when they're all slippery and lots and lots of accounts here about abortions and cheating on wives…all three of them, it seems….hmmmm? What’s that, Ron? Oh, you never had a second wife, did you? No, I guess that’s right…looks like that sex orgy cult thing was just a secret Naval Ops you were assigned and you went in and found it “very, very bad”, even though Crowley was your "very good friend", and you "saved a girl" who later ran a phony divorce caper on you and was a Ruskie spy…or was it a Nazi spy, Ron? Well, who can tell when you woke up drunk with her in bed? I'm sure the two of you "talked" about the first thing that "popped up"...hmmm, Ron?

And then the abortions stuff…looks like L. Ron, Jr…you do know, don’t you, Ron, that it’s very bad to name a child as a Junior because their engrams get confused with their father’s valence and it’s very, very bad! Well, anyway, Ron, Jr., talks about you practicing this Black Magik and abortions at home. And when Quentin died, Ron, looks like your greatest concern was how that made you look?

And then there’s all these affairs…like with old lady Heinlein...and Barbara Kaye who was another 18-year old when you're in your 40s…and getting all these venereal diseases and taking hormones and such…and it looks like you never attended your mother’s funeral, Ron…and what about all these SO Messengers in hot pants? What’s up with that, Ron? Would that be something like trying to make it with Dart Smohen’s mother or porking the ED’s wife while in Australia? I guess when Ron, Jr. says that you and Errol Flynn would take anything to bed he wasn’t kidding…why, there’s even reports that you and Heinlein experimented with homosexual sex!

OK, now back to this military stuff…was that sort of in the line of when you were a policeman, Ron? Did that conflict with your stolen weapons from the military, which is government property? Now, let’s see…sex with a Russian spy, or was it Nazi spy? PTS, pretending to be sick…begging for psychiatric care…security clearance with Navy Intelligence…letters to the FBI…all the Russian attempts to get you…convicted of fraud in France…quite a bit about plagiarism and bearing false witness…stolen guns from the government…other practices with the "moonchild" and this “guardian”…other practices with "Affirmation" tech…claiming to be the Beast…numerous posts and positions as a reporter – you know, Ron, that they’re Chaos Merchants?…fake PHDs, nuclear physicist, engineer, war hero…responsible for condition case with letters to Sara…running off with Parsons’ cash…trying to bankrupt Purcell and running in a black ops saboteur…OH!...and finding that “bomb” while in the Navy on the eve of being sent to combat? That was convenient, Ron.

And finally here at the end there’s a suicide attempt with an alter-ised E-meter. George, would that be a tech-degrade?

And through it all lots and lots of drugs and booze and money and sex!

Money...well, there's nothing wrong with a little money so our Founder seems to suggest...that's upstat!

My, my…I just know that we have something or other about being blackmailed and having a blackmailable past around here somewhere…well, that sinks it.

You’re hired! In fact, Ron, we’ve got a special position just for you! It’s the “Founder” - "The Commodore"!

Welcome back, sir!

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 3 MAY 1972R​

Remimeo
Executive Hats

REVISED 18 DECEMBER 1977

(Revision in this type style)

IMPORTANT


Executive Series 12

ETHICS AND EXECUTIVES​

Any person holding an executive post (head of department or above) is deemed an EXECUTIVE.

Evaluation has revealed that the breakdown in many orgs is a failure on the part of executives to wear their ethics and justice hats.

It has been found that below administrative Whys there is usually an ethics situation as well, which, unhandled, causes the administrative Why not to function or raise stats.

In an area which is downstat, it is the duty of an executive to investigate and find any out ethics situation and get it corrected.

Ethics is a personal thing in relation to a group. Unethical people are those who do not have ethics in on themselves personally.

It is the responsibility of the executive to see to it that persons under his control and in his area get their personal ethics in and keep them in.

Dishonesty, false reports, an out ethics personal life, should be looked for and, by persuasion, should be corrected.

When an executive sees such things, he or she must do all he can to get the person to get his own ethics in.

When an area is downstat, the executive must at once suspect an out ethics scene with one or more of the personnel, and must investigate and persuade the person to be more honest and ethical and correct the out ethics condition found.

If this does not correct, and if the person or area remains downstat, the executive must declare the person or area in Danger and apply HCO PL 9 Apr. 72, “CORRECT DANGER CONDITION HANDLING.”

The situation, if it does not correct, thereafter becomes a matter of full group justice with Courts and Comm Evs. Persons whose ethics have remained out must be replaced.

The seniors of an executive are bound to enforce this policy and to use it on any executives whose personal ethics are out and who fail to apply it. It will be found that those who do not apply this policy letter have themselves certain dishonesties or out ethics situations.

IT IS VITAL TO ANY ORGANIZATION, TO BE STRONG AND EFFECTIVE, TO BE ETHICAL.

THE MOST IMPORTANT ZONE OF ETHICAL CONDUCT IN AN ORGANI-ZATION IS AT OR NEAR THE TOP.

Ethical failure, at the top or just below it, can destroy an organization and make it downstat.

Historical examples are many.

THEREFORE, IT IS POLICY THAT AN EXECUTIVE MUST KEEP ETHICS IN ON HIMSELF AND THOSE BELOW HIM, OR BE DISCIPLINED OR COMM¬EVED AND REMOVED FROM ANY POST OF AUTHORITY, AND SOMEONE FOUND WHO IS HIMSELF ETHICAL AND CAN KEEP ETHICS IN ON THOSE UNDER HIS AUTHORITY.



The charge in any such case for a staff member or executive is FAILURE TO UPHOLD OR SET AN EXAMPLE OF HIGH ETHICAL STANDARDS.

Such offenses are composed of


1. DISHONESTY.

2. Use of false statements to cover up a situation.

3. Representing a scene to be different than it actually is to cover up crimes and escape discipline.

4. Irregular 2D connections and practices.

5. Drug or alcoholic addiction.

6. Encouraging out ethics.

7. Condoning or failing to effectively handle an out ethics situation in self or others as an in charge, officer or executive.

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 9 FEBRUARY 1971
Remimeo


EXECUTIVE MISBEHAVIOUR​

Executive Misbehaviour Policy No. 1: No Executive who begins or persists in a sexual relationship with a person hostile to or “open minded about“ Dianetics and Scientology may be retained on post or in the organization.

Executive Misbehaviour Policy No. 2: Any Executive who engages in activities for which he could be blackmailed may not hold any Executive post.

Executive Misbehaviour Policy No. 3: Any person who places personal interests and situations above the interest of the group may not hold an Executive post.

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 7 MAY 1969
(Revises HCO Policy Letter of 17 Oct. 1964)​

Remimeo
Franchise
Sthil Students
Sthil Staff
Dianetic Course

POLICIES ON “SOURCES OF TROUBLE”
See also HCO PL 6.4.69 II “DIANETIC REGISTRATION“​

Policies similar to those regarding physical illness and insanity exist for types of persons who have caused us considerable trouble.

These persons can be grouped under “sources of trouble”. They include:

(a) Persons intimately connected with persons (such as marital or familial ties) of known antagonism to mental or spiritual treatment or Scientology. In practice such persons, even when they approach Scientology in a friendly fashion, have such pressure continually brought to bear upon them by persons with undue influence over them that they make very poor gains in processing and their interest is solely devoted to proving the antagonistic element wrong.

They, by experience, produce a great deal of trouble in the long run as their own condition does not improve adequately under such stresses to effectively combat the antagonism. Their present time problem cannot be reached as it is continuous, and so long as it remains so, they should not be accepted for auditing by any organization or auditor.

(b) Criminals with proven criminal records often continue to commit so many undetected harmful acts between sessions that they do not make adequate case gains and therefore should not be accepted for processing by organizations or auditors.

(c) Persons who have ever threatened to sue or embarrass or attack or who have publicly attacked Scientology or been a party to an attack and all their immediate families should never be accepted for processing by a Central Organization or auditor. They have a history of only serving other ends than case gain and commonly again turn on the organization or auditor. They have already barred themselves out by their own overts against Scientology and are thereafter too difficult to help, since they cannot openly accept help from those they have tried to injure.

(d) Responsible-for-condition cases have been traced back to other causes for their condition too often to be acceptable. By responsible-for-condition cases is meant the person who insists a book or some auditor is “wholly responsible for the terrible condition I am in”. Such cases demand unusual favours, free auditing, tremendous effort on the part of auditors. Review of these cases show that they were in the same or worse condition long before auditing, that they are losing a planned campaign to obtain auditing for nothing, that they are not as bad off as they claim, and that their antagonism extends to anyone who seeks to help them, even their own families. Establish the rights of the matter and decide accordingly.

(e) Persons who are not being audited on their own determinism are a liability as they are forced into being processed by some other person and have no personal desire to become better. Quite on the contrary they usually want only to prove the person who wants them audited wrong and so do not get better. Until a personally determined goal to be processed occurs, the person will not benefit.

(f) Persons who “want to be processed to see if Scientology works” as their only reason for being audited have never been known to make gains as they do not participate. News reporters fall into this category. They should not be audited.

(g) Persons who claim that “if you help such and such a case” (at great and your expense) because somebody is rich and influential or the neighbors would be electrified should be ignored. Processing is designed for bettering individuals, not progressing by stunts or giving cases undue importance. Process only at convenience and usual arrangements. Make no extraordinary effort at the expense of other persons who do want processing for normal reasons. Not one of these arrangements has ever come off successfully as it has the unworthy goal of notoriety, not betterment.

(h) Persons who “have an open mind” but no personal hopes or desires for auditing of knowingness should be ignored, as they really don’t have all open mind at all, but a lack of ability to decide about things and are seldom found to be very responsible and waste anyone’s efforts “to convince them”.

(i) Persons who do not believe anything or anyone can get better. They have a purpose far being audited entirely contrary to the auditor’s and so in this conflict, do not benefit. When such persons are trained they use their training to degrade others. Thus they should not be accepted for training or auditing.

(j) Persons attempting to sit in judgment on Scientology in hearings or attempting to investigate Scientology should be given no undue importance. One should not seek to instruct or assist them in any way. This includes judges, boards, newspaper reporters, magazine writers, etc. All efforts to be helpful or instructive have done nothing beneficial as their first idea is a firm “I don’t know” and this usually ends with an equally firm “I don’t know”. If a person can’t see for himself or judge from the obvious, then he does not have sufficient powers of observation even to sort out actual evidence. In legal matters, only take the obvious effective steps – carry on no crusades in court. In the matter of reporters, etc., it is not worth while to give them any time contrary to popular belief. They are given their story before they leave their editorial rooms and you only strengthen what they have to say by saying anything. They are no public communication line that says much. Policy is very definite. Ignore.

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO POLICY LETTER OF 5 MAY 1980​

Remimeo
All Case Supervisors
All Ds of P
All Auditors
All Ethics Officers
GO Registrars

CANCELS
Pilot HCO PL 26 March 79 III


ILLEGAL PCs

(Cancels Pilot HCO PL 26 Mar 79 III
OUT TECH AND “ILLEGAL” PCs)

Ref.: HCO PL/HCOB 6 Dec 76R ILLEGAL PCs ACCEPTANCE OF HIGH CRIME PL/HCOB
HCO PL/HCOB 11 Feb 80 ILLEGAL PCs, ACCEPTANCE OF ADDITION REGARDING PURIFICATION RUNDOWN​

The above mentioned pilot policy on OUT TECH AND “ILLEGAL” PCs is hereby CANCELLED.

This PL made it a Comm Ev offense to mislabel someone an “illegal” pc. The effect this created was to divert staff’s attention by putting their attention on whether they would be comm ev’ed, rather than correctly spotting and handling an illegal pc.

This opened the door for illegal pcs to be let on lines for auditing.

Illegal pcs should be detected and correctly labelled.

The categories used in determining illegal pcs and their handling are contained in HCO PL/HCOB 6 Dec 76R ILLEGAL PCs, ACCEPTANCE OF HIGH CRIME PL/HCOB.

Per this policy, an illegal pc is any pc:

1. Who is terminally (fatally) ill, regardless of what the org or Registrars may have promised or asserted.

2. Who has an extensive psychiatric history which includes heavy drugs, or shocks of various kinds, or so-called psychiatric brain operations or institutionalization.

3. Who has been denied processing by the Guardian Office for reason of past history or connections or current state as it may affect the safety and security of the org.


This last category only includes persons who have been or whose family members are in the media, police and government organizations such as intelligence organizations or any other federal agency in any country. People who have gone to the press or have tried to sue Scientology are also covered in the above category.