Masterson’s victims, already on edge, have to deal with Danny’s aggressive process servers

Karen#1

Well-known member
Excerpt:


In October, we told you this about the Danny Masterson criminal case.

Since then, a trial date was set in the case, for August 29, even later than we’d predicted, and the harassment has gone on.

But now, we are less unsure about where the harassment is coming from.

According to one of the accusers as well as a witness in the case, over the last few days Danny Masterson’s defense Dream Team has sent out process servers to show up at their homes, aggressively knocking on their doors, yelling at neighbors, and otherwise trying in intimidating ways to serve new subpoenas on the victims.~~~READ MORE

 

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
Excerpt:


In October, we told you this about the Danny Masterson criminal case.

Since then, a trial date was set in the case, for August 29, even later than we’d predicted, and the harassment has gone on.

But now, we are less unsure about where the harassment is coming from.

According to one of the accusers as well as a witness in the case, over the last few days Danny Masterson’s defense Dream Team has sent out process servers to show up at their homes, aggressively knocking on their doors, yelling at neighbors, and otherwise trying in intimidating ways to serve new subpoenas on the victims.~~~READ MORE

.

Jeez, all that harassment and entheta seem so unnecessary!

Couldn't the Church of Scientology simply do a THIRD PARTY INVESTIGATION on each of the rape victims and ask them: "Who said you were in bad bed with Danny?"

Dr. Hubbard's research breakthrough revealed that once the hidden third party is discovered, all the rape victims' upset will instantly vanish.

If that doesn't work, the church still can use the ARC Triangle to raise the rape victims' tone level, so they are not so critical and antagonistic.

All of this could be handled so easily without all those wog courtrooms using their flakey squirrel justice "solutions" that don't work. I postulate and pray that all this DevT can soon get removed from Danny's lines!

.
 
Last edited:

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

Just to further expose the insanity of the cult of Scientology a little bit further. . .

They promote Hubbard's THIRD PARTY LAW, which is guaranteed to resolve all conflicts and even war between all 7.9 billion people on this planet!

All that is needed to stop people attacking, fighting and killing each other is just to ask them a couple minutes worth of simple questions:



The following is excerpted from Hubbard's scientific research
contained in an online Scientology course called
"HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS"

How to Find a Third Party
The way not to find a third party is to compile a questionnaire that asks one and all in various ways, “Have you been a victim?” Do not ask questions such as, “Who has been mean to you?” or other questions which would tend to elicit answers that the person has been victimized. This kind of question will not locate the individual stirring up conflicts between people but may only name executives and others in the group who are trying to get people to do their jobs and be productive!

Anyone who uses this approach (1) does not find any third party and (2) causes people to mentally or physically collapse to the extent that they cannot function causatively.

By definition, a third party is one who by false reports creates trouble between two people, a person and a group or a group and another group.

The object of the investigation, then, is to find out who has been spreading false reports in order to stir up conflicts between people or groups. To find a third party one has to ask those involved in the dispute questions along the following lines:

1a. Have you been told you were in bad?
b.What was said?
c. Who said it?
2a. Have you been told someone was bad?
b. What was said?
c. Who said it?
3a. Have you been told someone was doing wrong?
b. What was said?
c. Who said it?
4a. Have you been told a group was bad?
b. What was said?
c. Who said it?

---snipped for brevity---


.
 
Last edited:

Enthetan

Veteran of the Psychic Wars
By definition, a third party is one who by false reports creates trouble between two people, a person and a group or a group and another group
Is conflict between wolves and sheep caused by "third party"? Or by "lack of trust" (as some weak headed liberals sometimes say)?

Or is it because the wolves regard the sheep as prey?
 

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

And naturally the MAA or Missionnaire cannot be a "who" here.
.
Exactement!


THE HUBBARD LAW OF THE WHY, THE WHO
AND THE COMMAND CHANNEL WOO


The "why" and the "who" are always someone other than the person
who ordered or is conducting the ethics investigation. And the party who is
responsible for making things go wrong is always a DB/SP lower on the
command channel than the big being who made it go right to discover
and severely punish said wickedly counter-intentioned saboteur.

,
 
Last edited:

HelluvaHoax!

Well-known member
.

.
Is conflict between wolves and sheep caused by "third party"?

ANSWER: Yes, 100% of all conflicts between wolves/sheep are caused by a Third Party.

EXCEPTION: If during the investigation either the wolf or the sheep is discovered to have significant and discretionary monetary funds, the third party interrogatory is ceased—so that opposite party they are fighting can be labeled a DB and/or SP and immediately routed off lines to handle their lower ethics condition.

.
 
Last edited:
Top