I'm in no way special in this regard, I'm just like every other ex-scientologist and I do not claim special status. I do not consider Mike owes me anything that he doesn't owe all other exers. He doesn't owe us a detailed explanation and in turn do not owe him unconditional trust. But the latter should not come without the former.My question is why does Mike owe YOU any answers? FBI, certainly, and, according to Mike, he has. Police, certainly, and according to Mike, he has.
YOU? Why do you deserve anything? Yet YOU demand he MUST tell you everything or "guilty!"
That's my question: Why must Mike respond to you? Really, why?
I'm under the impression that you are asking me to give Mike unconditional trust despite the issues I outlined in the post above. I do not see a good reason to do so.
There's a difference between being guilty and not being given full trust. I think you have missed this distinction that I make.