I M Dex
Well-known member
This seeking/projecting/finding attribution to "other beings" strikes me as, and could well be an expression of Hubbard's lifelong failure to accept accountability for his own feelings and actions, becoming his way, his life philosophy, which he then imposed as the way to be throughout his "tech", "admin" and "ethics". As John Mcmaster related in recordings I've listened to, Hubbard believed he had a "standard case", and sometimes would test out a process before issuing it simply by running it on himself. And so his "demons", as he saw it, being incapable and/or unwilling to own any part of his "case" or misbehaviors, were passed on as being the same for everyone else. He's a prime example of what happens when you go this deeply into denial of self-accountability, a cautionary tale of epic proportion.Hubbard went back and forth as to whether the demon circuits, valence circuits or standing ridge entities were really other-determined. This topic early on had crucial bearing on the new state of clear and natural clear. It changed the whole grade chart. The Why was the elusive understanding and it went all the way back to the early 50s. It's still a bone of contention today and may have weight in the Max Hauri / Dani Lemberger fricitons. When do creations get endowed with a a personal WILL? Is it a right, or is it endowed by a higher power?
The OT VIII checksheet, assembled from recall by Arianne ?, shows it's about theta ability to divide itself. There's a lot of valence splitting and sorting out what theta was abandoned or created by whom. It might indicate a different take on the NOTS. I don't know. It also seem to aim for a viewpoint more a Static. I know there are many versions over the years.
snippet
View attachment 26425
Dropbox
www.dropbox.com