Chris Dunn evidence of advanced technology in Egypt

[Hatshepsut]

hypothesis at Giza death star

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

www.youtube.com

LRH said there were nothing here yet during the purported space wars. No pyramids. Just primitives. If the agencies could beat fixated time, they could probably beat gravity also.

 

[Hatshepsut]

Mention of ship beneath Sphynx complex which can 'easily defeat the enemy'.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

youtube.com

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

youtube.com

 

[Hatshepsut]

Beautiful video presentation of exquisite stonework

 

[guanoloco]

Whenever there's theory-based evidence narratives we don't have actual theories. An actual theory will predict unobserved as well as observed data. When the theory conflicts with observations then they either not-is the observation or we get theory prime...then theory prime-prime...then theory prime-prime-prime - the whole goal is reversed because the impetus is to prove the theory "true". In real science all experiments and efforts are designed to prove the theory false.

So the band saturation of CO2 has been well known for over a century.

That doesn't fit the narrative.

So then what happens? Then they do a theory prime and start going into "pressure" that "flattens" the CO2 that then would broaden the band and lead to more heat trapped, etc. This is woo.

The erroneous comparison will be the atmosphere of Venus because 97% CO2. However, Mimsey pointed out that Mars has the same composition level - roughly...something like 95% CO2...and it rarely gets above 95 degrees Fahrenheit. Why? Couple reasons...the dense atmosphere of Venus is 100 times denser than Earth's - while Earth's is 100 times denser than Mars's. That means that Venus's atmosphere is 10,000 times denser than Mars's.

And then the volcanoes. Earth has 1,500 - Venus has 85,000 - Mars has 0.

There's little evidence that more CO2 broadens the band, etc. There's over 100s of millions of years of Earth's global history where CO2 levels were 5 times great than today - or higher - with little difference in global temperatures.

She goes with the whole theory prime effort to prove the narrative true - she goes to no evidence when ample contrary evidence exists.

That's my estimation.

Again, CO2 on Earth is .04% of its atmosphere. Human contribution to that 4/100ths of 1 percent is a mere 4%. This is such a minimal amount - there's just no way that the CO2 content is that volatile - it defies logic. That's more explosive, if the narrative is true, than nitroglycerin. We barely touch it and it explodes to an inferno that destroys nature, life and humanity. The telltale, though, is that this is ALL coming from one political Party. As I've said before, both communists and capitalists wash their hands due to Germ Theory. When science is all from one political Party - it's not science. Oh...and the solution? Why, socialism, of course. That makes total sense, right?

In addition, when they, and she, goes to refute the saturation aspect it's done with mockery, flippancy, ad hominem - it's strained. Me thinks the lady doth protest too much...

If something is false then it's false and there's no need to cheapen the argument by mockery, flippancy and ad hom. All that they would need to do is to provide the evidence that proves the saturation false. This is attempted but it's contrived, inconsistent and doesn't bear out with historical evidence that exists in troves. In fact, the historical evidence is irrefutable and clearly established.

This was pointed out today:

Venus receives almost twice as much energy from the sun as the Earth due to proximity. Also, one day on Venus is slightly longer than its year, although not tidally locked to the sun, one side of the planet is pummeled with solar radiation for half if its year. The only similarity between the two planets is the mass.​