I'm not saying one way or the other but when I see the following sentence in a denial of something, it is for the purpose of stopping any further look into the topic:Remote viewing - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
When many papers are written to discourage people from looking further as if it has been researched to all possible ends and nothing is there is common method of directing people away from, and also toward, a subject.
Is that why, immediately following the statement you quoted, there are SIX LINKS to relevant material. To stop any further look into the topic?I'm not saying one way or the other but when I see the following sentence in a denial of something, it is for the purpose of stopping any further look into the topic:
NoIs that why, immediately following the statement you quoted, there are SIX LINKS to relevant material. To stop any further look into the topic?
Scientology isn't the only one who uses NDA's. In fact, they were created elsewhere.Against my better judgement I listened to this vid (well, the first 20 minutes or so of it anyway).
The speaker mentioned somebody called Joe McMonagle (I don't know if I have the name exactly right but that's what it sounded like) and described him as "probably the greatest living psychic today", so what I want to know is, if that is the case, how is it that I've never heard of him? If you went out onto the streets of New York or LA or Tampa or wherever it is that you live, I'm willing to bet that 99% of the people have never heard of him either, if you were to ask them.
To me that doesn't make sense. This person is supposedly able to do demonstrate the most stupendous feats of psychic ability, but all I hear is crickets, which leads me to believe there's something not completely kosher about all this and that deep down people know it and consequently he hasn't become a household name, whereas plenty of bogus 'psychics' are far more well-known than he is.
If you want to believe in this stuff that's your business; personally I remain totally unconvinced, and until I see incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, that's the way I'll stay, sorry.
To me that's like saying 'We can't demonstrate our OT abilities because you wouldn't be able to deal with it'.Scientology isn't the only one who uses NDA's. In fact, they were created elsewhere.
Actually I don't, and don't believe in UFO's either because you need space to fly them in.To me that's like saying 'We can't demonstrate our OT abilities because you wouldn't be able to deal with it'.
I don't mean this in a pejorative way, but you probably believe there are aliens walking among us, whereas I don't.
lol, where is the Magic thread?Actually I don't, and don't believe in UFO's either because you need space to fly them in.
You want the Magic thread?lol, where is the Magic thread?
I believe in UFOs cuz I've seen them twice.
What I saw was definitely not standard fare in the flying objects dept. It was cubic in shape and vanished from a vast expanse of blue sky (in broad daylight) in about 1 second. The other was a night sighting of something flying, stopping, another object descending from the 1st and then both flying off.You want the Magic thread?
A UFO technically is an unidentified flying object. However in modern culture it is associated with extraterrestrial visitors from another planet.
You may very well have seen something in the air that was unidentified and didn't look like normal aircraft but it doesn't mean it came from some other planet or contained extraterrestrial beings at the controls.
I've heard the cube object described before. I have a friend who said he saw one in Bermuda that he said went very fast in a line and then suddenly went 90 degrees instantly and disappeared.What I saw was definitely not standard fare in the flying objects dept. It was cubic in shape and vanished from a vast expanse of blue sky (in broad daylight) in about 1 second. The other was a night sighting of something flying, stopping, another object descending from the 1st and then both flying off.
You might read his book - it goes into the project in greater detail. His point is that it is a natural ability, but it needs practice, and sometimes it gets fuzzy results. He goes into some remote viewing tests they performed, how they did it - some of the results, how remote viewing solved the Patty Hurst case. He has an app that you can down load on your phone to train yourself. It's much like some of the Scientology OT wins - they happen but not necessarily on command, and are thus hard to pin down.Against my better judgement I listened to this vid (well, the first 20 minutes or so of it anyway).
The speaker mentioned somebody called Joe McMonagle (I don't know if I have the name exactly right but that's what it sounded like) and described him as "probably the greatest living psychic today", so what I want to know is, if that is the case, how is it that I've never heard of him? If you went out onto the streets of New York or LA or Tampa or wherever it is that you live, I'm willing to bet that 99% of the people have never heard of him either, if you were to ask them.
To me that doesn't make sense. This person is supposedly able to do demonstrate the most stupendous feats of psychic ability, but all I hear is crickets, which leads me to believe there's something not completely kosher about all this and that deep down people know it and consequently he hasn't become a household name, whereas plenty of bogus 'psychics' are far more well-known than he is.
If you want to believe in this stuff that's your business; personally I remain totally unconvinced, and until I see incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, that's the way I'll stay, sorry.
I use the example Enthetan often uses re. scientology - if it really was effective, people would be queuing around the block to get some. This is not some skill like solving maths problems in your head in lightning quick time, you're talking about an ability that humans have been obsessed with since the year dot, and if somebody had finally REALLY AND TRULY CRACKED IT it would be worldwide sensation, but in fact only a small clique of 'believers' know about it. Why? I rest my case.You might read his book - it goes into the project in greater detail. His point is that it is a natural ability, but it needs practice, and sometimes it gets fuzzy results. He goes into some remote viewing tests they performed, how they did it - some of the results, how remote viewing solved the Patty Hurst case. He has an app that you can down load on your phone to train yourself. It's much like some of the Scientology OT wins - they happen but not necessarily on command, and are thus hard to pin down.
Mimsey
I saw something almost exactly like that about four years ago.What I saw was definitely not standard fare in the flying objects dept. It was cubic in shape and vanished from a vast expanse of blue sky (in broad daylight) in about 1 second. The other was a night sighting of something flying, stopping, another object descending from the 1st and then both flying off.